AB 193,
as amended, Logue. begin deleteMunicipal end deletebegin insertLocal end insertballot measures: arguments.
Existing law specifies procedures applicable to the preparation, submittal, and printing of arguments for and against abegin insert county orend insert city ballot measure that qualifies for a place on the ballot. Existing law requires thebegin insert county orend insert city elections official to fix a datebegin delete 14 days from the calling of the electionend deletebegin insert, as specified,end insert as a deadline for submission of arguments for and againstbegin delete a cityend deletebegin insert
aend insert ballot measure.
This bill would require thebegin insert county orend insert city elections official to extend the deadline for submission of arguments relating to abegin delete cityend delete ballot measure by one calendar day if an argument in favor of or against abegin delete cityend delete measure is not submitted by the deadline fixed by the official. In doing so, this bill would require thebegin insert county orend insert city elections official to immediately issue a press release requesting that arguments for or against the measure, or both, as applicable, be submitted by the extended deadline.
By imposing additional duties on local elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 9166.5 is added to the end insertbegin insertElections Codeend insertbegin insert,
2to read:end insert
(a) Notwithstanding Section 9163, if an argument in
4favor of or against a county measure is not submitted for inclusion
5with the sample ballot materials by the date fixed by the county
6elections official, the county elections official shall do both of the
7following:
8(1) Extend the deadline to submit arguments for or against the
9measure by one calendar day.
10(2) Immediately issue a press release that contains all of the
11following:
12(A) The impartial analysis of the measure prepared by the county
13counsel or the district attorney pursuant to Section 9160.
14(B) A statement that an argument for or against the measure,
15or both, has not been submitted for inclusion with the sample ballot
16materials.
17(C) A request that arguments for or against the measure, or
18both, as applicable, be submitted by the extended deadline.
19(b) If the county elections official extends the deadline pursuant
20to subdivision (a), any person or organization otherwise qualified
21to submit an argument relating to the county measure may submit
22an argument for or against the measure, as applicable, by the
23extended deadline. The argument shall be prepared and submitted
24in accordance with Sections 9162 and 9164.
Section 9288 is added to the Elections Code, to read:
(a) Notwithstanding Section 9286, if an argument in
2favor of or against a city measure is not submitted for inclusion
3with the sample ballot materials by the date fixed by the city
4elections official, the city elections official shall do both of the
5following:
6(1) Extend the deadline to submit arguments for or against the
7measure by one calendar day.
8(2) Immediately issue a press release that contains all of the
9following:
10(A) The impartial analysis of the measure prepared by the city
11attorney pursuant to Section 9280.
12(B) A statement that an argument for or against the measure, or
13both, has notbegin delete beend deletebegin insert beenend insert submitted for inclusion with the sample ballot
14materials.
15(C) A request that arguments for or against the measure, or both,
16as applicable, be submitted by the extended deadline.
17(b) If the city elections official extends the deadline pursuant
18to subdivision (a), any person or organization otherwise qualified
19to submit an argument relating to the city measure may submit an
20argument for or against the measure, as applicable, by the extended
21deadline. The argument shall be
prepared and submitted in
22accordance with Sections 9282 and 9283.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
25this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
26local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
27pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
284 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
96