BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 197
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 17, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                  AB 197 (Stone) - As Introduced:  January 29, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Human  
          ServicesVote:6 - 1 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill exempts motor vehicles from the assets that must be  
          considered by county welfare departments when determining a  
          family's eligibility for CalWORKs.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Potential on-going savings in the CalWORKs program of $3  
            million (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families  
            [TANF]/Maintenance of Effort [MOE]) per year.

             a)   Increased grant costs of $1 million (TANF/MOE) for  
               2013-2014, increasing to $7.2 million (TANF/MOE) in 2014-15  
               due to an increased CalWORKs caseload.

             b)   Savings of $5 million (TANF/MOE) in 2013-2014, growing  
               to approximately $10 million (TANF/MOE) in 2014-2015 and  
               beyond due to reduced administrative workload. 

          2)Actual administrative savings would likely be less as the  
            CalWORKs program has not received funding increases to keep  
            pace with actual operations costs since 2001.  In addition,  
            county welfare departments have sustained hundreds of millions  
            of dollars of cuts over the last several years. However,  
            reducing the workload associated with CalWORKs eligibility  
            would help relieve the funding pressures faced by county  
            welfare departments.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . The primary goal of the CalWORKs program is to move  








                                                                  AB 197
                                                                  Page  2

            families out of poverty toward self-sufficiency.  One of the  
            key components of the program is requiring that adult  
            participants either work or receive some type of training that  
            will help them get a job.  The author argues that limiting the  
            family to an automobile with a value of less than $4,650 is  
            contrary to that goal.  Without reliable transportation  
            parents are often unable to get to work or job training and  
            therefore are unable to work their way out of poverty and off  
            of the welfare rolls.  By eliminating the vehicle from  
            consideration for eligibility, parents will not be forced to  
            choose between reliable transportation and receiving much  
            needed financial assistance for their families.

           2)California Asset  Rules  . CalWORKs asset rules were enacted in  
            1997 when the state implemented the 1996 federal welfare  
            reform act. Families are limited in the value of assets or  
            resources they may own. The program incorporates federal food  
            stamp rules, which limits resources to $2,000 per household,  
            or $3,000 if a family has a member who is aged or disabled.  
            Some assets, such as the family's home and $4,650 in value of  
            a motor vehicle, are excluded from consideration in the  
            determination of a family's resources. Also excluded are  
            assets that are not available to a household, such as the cash  
            value of life insurance policies and pension funds. 
           
          3)Related Legislation  . 

             a)   AB 2352 (Hern�ndez), 2012, a virtually identical bill,  
               was held on the Senate Appropriations Committee suspense  
               file. 

             b)   AB 1182 (Hern�ndez), 2011, which was virtually identical  
               to this legislation, was vetoed.  In his veto message the  
               governor noted, "In the last year, the state has been  
               forced to make steep reductions in many programs, including  
               the state's welfare-to-work program. As we go into the new  
               year, we may have to make additional cuts. Until we better  
               understand the fiscal outlook, we should not be making  
               changes of this kind."

             c)   AB 1058 (Beall), 2009, would have deleted the  
               requirement that county welfare departments assess the  
               value of a vehicle when determining a CalWORKs' application  
               or recertification.  That bill was held on the Senate  
               Appropriations Committee Suspense File.








                                                                  AB 197
                                                                  Page  3


             d)   AB 2368 (Fuentes), 2008, would have exempted motor  
               vehicles from assets that must be considered by county  
               welfare departments when they are determining a family's  
               eligibility for CalWORKs. That bill was held on the Senate  
               Appropriations Committee Suspense File. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081