BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 24, 2013

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                                Joan Buchanan, Chair
                    AB 200 (Hagman) - As Amended:  April 18, 2013

          [This bill is being heard for information purposes.  No vote  
          will be taken at this hearing.]

           SUBJECT  :   Education finance:  categorical programs

           SUMMARY  :   Changes the method of allocating funds for specified  
          categorical programs and requires local education agencies to  
          provide reports on the expenditure of those funds at each  
          schoolsite, as specified.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Repeals the 2014-15 fiscal year termination date of the K-12  
            "Tier 3" categorical program block grant.

          2)Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to  
            determine the amount of funding per average daily attendance  
            (ADA) school districts received for the Tier 3 categorical  
            programs in 2013-14.

          3)Requires, commencing with the 2014-15 fiscal year, the SPI to  
            apportion funds for the Tier 3 categorical programs to each  
            district on the basis of the amount it received per ADA in  
            2013-14 multiplied by its current year ADA.

          4)Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to adopt  
            uniform definitions for the Standardized Account Code  
            Structure reporting process that, at a minimum, include all  
            data field definitions consistent with school-level  
            expenditure reporting adopted by the department pursuant to  
            the requirements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act  
            of 2009..

          5)Requires local education agencies (LEAs), as a condition of  
            receipt of funds, and using the Standardized Account Code  
            Structure, to report to the CDE and on its Internet web site  
            information on the expenditure per ADA of funds at the  
            district level and at each school site.

          6)Requires the CDE to annually collect the school site  
            expenditure information from all LEAs and provide it to the  








                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  2

            Department of Finance (DOF) and the appropriate policy and  
            budget committees by April 15 each year.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Establishes a "Tier 3" block of K-12 categorical programs  
            through the 2014-15 fiscal year.

          2)Requires the SPI to apportion Tier 3 funds to LEAs, based on  
            the relative proportion that each LEA received in 2008-09.

          3) Authorizes LEAs to use Tier 3 funds for any educational  
            purpose through 2014-15.

          4)Requires LEAs, through 2014-15, to use the Standardized  
            Account Code Structure to report the district-level  
            expenditure of Tier 3 funds to the CDE, and requires the CDE  
            to report this information to the DOF and the appropriate  
            budget and policy committees of the Legislature by April 15  
            each year up to and including April 15, 2016.

          5)Requires each school to prepare and make available to the  
            public a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which  
            provides school-level information on a variety of factors,  
            including school finances.

           FISCAL EFFECT :   State-mandated local program

           COMMENTS  :   This bill changes the funding mechanism for Tier 3  
          categorical programs and requires local education agencies to  
          report on school site-level expenditures of the funds each year  
          to the CDE.

           Tier 3 categorical programs  .  Categorical program flexibility  
          was provided as part of the 2008-09 budget to help LEAs manage a  
          nearly 20% reduction in state K-12 funding.  Funding for some  
          programs-notably special education, child care, and economic  
          impact aid, among others-was neither reduced nor flexed.  These  
          are referred to as Tier 1 programs.  Funding for other programs  
          (English learner assistance programs, student assessments, and  
          charter school facility grants, among others) was reduced but  
          not flexed.  These are referred to as Tier 2 programs.  Funding  
          for all other programs, the Tier 3 programs, was both reduced  
          and flexed.  There are 38 Tier 3 programs, the largest five of  
          which are Targeted Instructional Improvement Block Grant (TIIG),  








                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  3

          adult education, regional occupational centers and programs,  
          School and Library Improvement Block Grant, and the  
          instructional materials block grant.

          Since 2008-09, funding for the Tier 3 programs has essentially  
          been frozen at the 2008-09level.   This bill  , commencing with the  
          2014-15 fiscal year, shifts to a formula based on ADA.  As a  
          result, total funding for Tier 3 programs for each district will  
          increase or decrease each year in accordance with increases or  
          decreases in district ADA.  The bill also permanently maintains  
          the existing flexibility for the Tier 3 programs.

          Prior to being flexed many of the Tier 3 programs were not  
          funded on the basis of ADA.  The following list of the current  
          Tier 3 programs shows in bold the programs that have  
          historically been funded based on either ADA or enrollment.  The  
          other programs have been historically been funded on the basis  
          of cost reimbursement, grants, number of teachers, or other  
          workload measures.

                Tier 3 Programs (Historically ADA- or enrollment-based  
          programs are in bold)

                    Supplemental Instruction (Summer School)
                    ROC/Ps
                    Supplemental School Counseling (per pupil with a  
          school site minimum)
                    Specialized Secondary Programs Grants
                    Gifted and Talented Education Program (ADA with a  
          school site minimum)
                    Mathematics and Reading Professional Development  
          Program
                    Administrator Trainer Program
                    American Indian Early Childhood Education Centers
                    American Indian Education Centers
                    Adult Education
                    Education Technology
                    Deferred Maintenance
                    Instructional Materials Block Grant
                    Community Day Schools
                    Teacher Peer Review
                    National Board Certification Incentives
                    CalSAFE
                    CAHSEE Support and Services
                    Civic Education








                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  4

                    Teacher Dismissal Apportionment
                    Charter School Categorical Block Grant
                    Community-Based English Tutoring
                    School Safety Block Grant (enrollment in grades 8-12,  
          inclusive)
                    Grade 9 Class Size Reduction (enrollment in grade 9)
                    Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate  
          Programs
                    California Association of Student Councils
                    Pupil Retention Block Grant
                    Teacher Credentialing Block Grant
                    Professional Development Block Grant
                    Targeted Instructional Improvement Program
                    School/Library Improvement Block Grant
                    School Safety Competitive Grants
                    Physical Education Teacher Incentive Grants
                    Art and Music Block Grant
                    County Office of Education Williams Audits
                    Agricultural Vocational Education
                    Oral Health Assessment
                    Alternative Teacher Certification Program

          Only eight of the 38 programs have historically been funded on  
          the basis of district wide or grade level-specific ADA or  
          enrollment.  The committee may wish to consider whether it is  
          appropriate to permanently shift to an ADA-based funding system  
          for programs that have historically been funded on the basis of  
          other workload measures.

           School-site financial reports  .  Existing law requires every  
          school in California to publish a School Accountability Report  
          Care (SARC) by February 1 each year.  The SARC is required to  
          contain specified information about student enrollment,  
          demographics, and academic performance; school climate and  
          facilities; teachers; support staff; curriculum and  
          instructional materials, and school finances.  With respect to  
          school finances, the SARC is required to include total  
          expenditures per pupil broken down by restricted and  
          unrestricted expenditures per pupil.  The SARC must also contain  
          the average teacher salary for the school.

           This bill  requires a separate annual school site expenditure  
          report only for funds received for Tier 3 categorical programs.   
          The bill also requires the CDE to adopt uniform definitions for  
          the Standardized Account Code Structure that schools must use  








                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  5

          for the annual expenditure reports.  Until the definitions are  
          adopted, it cannot be known what level of detail will be  
          required.  The committee may wish to consider whether the  
          additional report required by this bill will add to the public's  
          knowledge and understanding of a school's performance and  
          condition.

           Related legislation  .

          AB 88 (Buchanan), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, contains the Governor's proposal to implement a Local  
          Control Funding Formula (LCFF) for schools.  The LCFF would  
          eliminated virtually all categorical programs and allocate most  
          K-12 dollars through a base grant plus supplemental funding.   
          The supplemental funding would be based on an LEA's enrollment  
          of English learners, pupils eligible for free or reduced price  
          meals, and pupils in foster care.

          AB 200 (Hagman), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, eliminates the sunset date on the Tier 3 categorical  
          programs and provides that, beginning in 2014-15, funds for  
          those programs shall be allocated based on the amount per ADA  
          each recipient received in 2013-14.

          AB 470 (Mullin), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, removes the Teacher Credentialing block Grant from  
          Tier 3 flexibility and requires the SPI and the California  
          Commission on Teacher Credentialing to perform onsite reviews  
          for all California Beginning Teacher support and Assessment  
          programs (BTSA), implement high-quality teacher induction  
          programs, and enforce existing BTSA program standards.

          AB 558 (Cooley), which is currently pending in the Assembly  
          Education Committee, extends the phase out of the reduced  
          penalties for exceeding K-3 class size reduction  
          pupil-to-teacher ratios.

          AB 1152 (Ammiano), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, removes the California School Age Families Education  
          Program (Cal-SAFE) from Tier 3.

          AB 1186 (Bonilla), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, extends the flexibility for Tier 3 categorical  
          program funds, provided, beginning with the 2013-14 fiscal year,  
          a school district that receives them agrees to use at least 9%  








                                                                  AB 200
                                                                  Page  6

          of the total funds for professional development for certificated  
          and administrative employees related to implementation of the  
          common core content standards; purchasing technology to  
          implement assessments aligned with the common core content  
          standards; or implementation of programs to integrate science,  
          technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in grades 7 to  
          12, inclusive.

          AB 1215 (Muratsuchi), which is pending in the Assembly Education  
          Committee, requires that an annual appropriation from the  
          General Fund be made directly to  the Southern California  
          Regional Occupational Center for the purposes of providing  
          career and technical education services.  

          SB 223 (Liu), which passed the Senate Education Committee on a  
          9-0 vote and is pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee,  
          extends categorical flexibility in exchange for the recipient  
          LEA agreeing to specified accountability preconditions.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          EdVoice

           Opposition 
           
          None received
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087