BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT BILL NO: AB 205
Jim Beall, Chair HEARING DATE: June 10, 2013
AB 205 (Pan) as introduced 1/30/13 FISCAL: NO
PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS: INVESTMENTS IN CALIF. INFRASTRUCTURE
HISTORY :
Sponsor: Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
Other legislation: SB 955 (Pavley),
Chapter 760, Statutes of 2012
ASSEMBLY VOTES :
PER & SS 5-2 5/08/13
Assembly Floor 55-20 5/13/13
SUMMARY :
AB 205 adds the board of retirement or board of investments
of a retirement system established under the County
Employees' Retirement Law of 1937 ('37 Act) to the list of
public retirement system boards that are authorized to
prioritize investment in in-state infrastructure projects
over alternative out-of-state projects if the investments are
consistent with the board's fiduciary responsibility.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS :
1) Existing law :
a) under the state Constitution by Proposition 162, the
California Pension Protection Act of 1992, provides that
the boards of California's public retirement systems have
"plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for
investment of monies and administration of the system."
Under Proposition 162, the Legislature retained its
authority to, by statute, prohibit certain investments by
a retirement board where it is in the public interest to
do so, and provided that the prohibition satisfies the
standards of fiduciary care and loyalty required of a
retirement board pursuant to this section.
Pamela Schneider
Date: May 29, 2013 Page
1
The Constitution also states, "The members of the
retirement board of a public pension or retirement
system shall discharge their duties with respect to the
system solely in the interest of, and for the exclusive
purposes of providing benefits to, participants and
their beneficiaries, minimizing employer contributions
thereto, and defraying reasonable expenses of
administering the system."
b) as enacted by SB 955 (Pavley and Rubio), Chapter 760,
Statutes of 2012:
i. states that the California Public Employees'
Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State
Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) may prioritize
investments in in-state infrastructure projects over
alternative out-of-state projects if the investments
are consistent with each system's fiduciary
responsibility.
ii. defines infrastructure to include
telecommunications, power, transportation, ports,
petrochemicals, and utilities.
iii. states that the Legislature's encourages each board
to prioritize investment in in-state infrastructure
projects over a comparable out-of-state infrastructure
project, consistent with fiduciary duties.
iv. specifies that nothing in the bill requires CalPERS
or CalSTRS to take action that is inconsistent with
its plenary authority and fiduciary responsibilities.
a) establishes the County Employees' Retirement Law of
1937, which governs 20 independent county retirement
systems.
2) This bill adds the '37 Act retirement systems to the
statute encouraging public retirement systems to prioritize
investments in California infrastructure.
FISCAL :
Pamela Schneider
Date: May 29, 2013 Page
2
This bill has been keyed non-fiscal by Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS :
1) Argument in Support :
According to the sponsor, the Service Employees International
Union (SEIU), "AB 205 would authorize the '37 Act retirement
systems to give preference to infrastructure investments in
California when determining which investments to participate
in. At the urging of SEIU and other public employee
organizations, CalPERS and CalSTRS have both dedicated
investment resources toward investment in California
infrastructure. CalPERS has set aside $800 million to be
directly invested in projects that create California jobs in
our communities."
2) SUPPORT :
Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Sponsor
American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO
Glendale City Employees' Association (GCEA)
Organization of SMUD Employees (OSE)
San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA)
San Luis Obispo County Employees Association (SLOCEA)
Santa Rosa City Employees Association (SRCEA)
3) OPPOSITION :
None to date #####
Pamela Schneider
Date: May 29, 2013 Page
3