BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 212|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 212
          Author:   Lowenthal (D)
          Amended:  6/24/13 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-2, 7/2/13
          AYES:  Corbett, Jackson, Leno, Monning
          NOES:  Walters, Anderson
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Evans

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 8/30/13
          AYES:  De León, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  54-22, 5/29/13 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Unclaimed property

           SOURCE  :     State Controller John Chiang


           DIGEST  :    This bill, beginning July 1, 2014, requires a person  
          holding escheated property to include in his or her report to  
          the State Controller (Controller) the name and last known  
          address of the apparent owner of any escheated property, except  
          travelers checks and money orders, worth at least $25.  This  
          bill allows the holder to report information regarding escheated  
          items worth less than $25 in aggregate.  This bill authorizes a  
          banking or financial institution to impose a service charge for  
          notice if the deposit, account, shares, or other interest has a  
          value greater than $2.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1.The Unclaimed Property Law (UPL) requires property held or  
            owing by a business association that is unclaimed for more  
            than three years, as specified, to file a report with the  
            Controller and turn over that property to the state.  

          2.Provides that if a banking or financial organization is the  
            holder of unclaimed property and has in its records an address  
            for the apparent owner of property valued at $50 or more, the  
            holder shall make reasonable efforts to notify the owner that  
            the owner's property will escheat to the state on a specified  
            date.  The notice shall be mailed not less than six nor more  
            than 12 months before the time when the owner's property would  
            escheat and become reportable to the Controller.

          3.Permits a banking or financial organization to impose a  
            service charge on the deposit, account, shares, or other  
            interest for the above notice in an amount not to exceed the  
            administrative cost of mailing or electronically sending the  
            notice and form, and in no case to exceed $2.

          4.Requires, except with respect to traveler's checks and money  
            orders, a person holding funds or other property that has  
            escheated to the state to report the name, if known, and last  
            known address, if any, of each person appearing from the  
            records of the holder to be the owner of any property of value  
            of at least $50. 

          5.Permits escheated items of value under $50 each to be reported  
            by the holder to the Controller in aggregate.  

          6.Authorizes the Controller to bring an action to enforce  
            provisions of the UPL and provides for the imposition of  
            penalties and interest against holders who willfully fail to  
            comply with its provisions.

          7.Authorizes any person, except another state, who claims an  
            interest in property paid or delivered to the Controller to  
            file a claim to the property.
           
          This bill:

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          3

           
           1.Requires, beginning July 1, 2014, a person holding escheated  
            property to include in his or her report to the Controller the  
            name and last known address of the apparent owner of any  
            escheated property, except travelers checks and money orders,  
            worth at least $25.

          2.Clarifies that banks and financial organizations may impose a  
            service charge of up to $2 to cover the cost of providing  
            required notices to owners only if the unclaimed property has  
            a value greater than $2.

           Background
           
          The Unclaimed Property Law (UPL), as revised in 1968, provides  
          for the "escheat" of unclaimed personal property.  Escheat is  
          the reversion of property to the state by reason of the failure  
          of the owner to inherit or claim it.

          The UPL specifies conditions when unclaimed property held by a  
          third party may escheat to the state.  For banks and financial  
          organizations, unclaimed property may escheat to the state when  
          an owner fails to act on an account for more than three years  
          after the date the funds became distributable or payable.   
          Existing law requires these entities to send owners of unclaimed  
          property valued at $50 or more specified notices that identify  
          the property and warn the owner that their property may escheat  
          to the state unless they take certain specified actions to  
          reclaim the property.  The law permits banks and financial  
          organizations to impose a service charge of up to $2 to cover  
          the cost of providing such notices.

          The UPL also establishes procedures to be followed when, after  
          the above notices have been sent, the property goes unclaimed  
          and reverts to the state.  Under existing law, the holder must  
          annually report on unclaimed property and turn the property over  
          to the Controller.  Banks and financial organizations are  
          required to submit an annual report to the Controller that  
          identifies all property that has escheated to the state, and,  
          for property valued at $50 or more, to identify the name, if  
          known, and the last known address of the property owner.   
          Escheated unclaimed property valued under $50 may be reported in  
          the aggregate, and reporting entities need not provide the name  
          and address of the property owner in their annual report even if  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          4

          they have such information.  The UPL also sets forth the  
          procedure for any person who claims an interest in the property  
          to file a claim to recover the property from the state.

           Prior Legislation
           
          AB 2117 (Niello, 2010) would have eliminated the regular  
          transfer of unclaimed property funds from the Abandoned Property  
          Fund to the General Fund, would have required the Controller to  
          add an interest payment to any claim for unclaimed property that  
          the Controller pays to an owner, and would have extended the  
          escheatment period for most types of unclaimed property from  
          three years to five years.  This bill failed passage in the  
          Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

          AB 1291 (Niello, Chapter 522, Statutes of 2009) made various  
          reforms to the UPL to strengthen property owners' rights and  
          ensure that property holders reasonably inform customers about  
          risks associated with leaving accounts dormant and the potential  
          for escheatment of property after a period of inactivity.  

          SB 1319 (Machado, 2008) would have relieved a holder of  
          escheated property of liability if the holder complied with  
          notification requirements, would have increased civil penalties  
          for non-compliance with the UPL, and would have revised  
          notification requirements for holders of unclaimed property.   
          This bill was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.

          AB 378 (Steinberg, Chapter 304, Statutes of 2003) reduced the  
          escheatment period from five years to three years for bank  
          checks and deposit accounts, and from three years to one year  
          for wages and salaries.

          AB 1772 (Harman, Chapter 813, Statutes of 2002) prescribed the  
          notice and information that a bank or financial institution must  
          give to owners of financial accounts that are about to escheat  
          to the state, and required the same notice by other holders of  
          tangible and intangible property subject to the UPL.

          SB 673 (Speier, 2001) would have provided for notices to be sent  
          by mail from the Controller to apparent owners of unclaimed  
          property, and for the Controller to take further steps,  
          including searches of other governmental records and outreach to  
          the general public, to alert owners that their unclaimed  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          5

          property had escheated to the state.  This bill was held in the  
          Assembly Committee on Appropriations.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           The State Controller's Office (SCO) costs of approximately  
            $120,000 annually, beginning in 2014-15, to provide additional  
            notices to owners of lower-valued property escheated to the  
            state that was formerly included in the aggregate reporting  
            without owner contact information (General Fund).

           The SCO estimates revenue losses of $12,544 in 2015-16,  
            $92,544 in 2016-17, and $143,744 in 2017-18, with moderate  
            ongoing growth, as a result of increased claims by owners of  
            lower-valued property escheated to the state that was formerly  
            included in the aggregate reporting without owner contact  
            information (General Fund).  Actual losses could be higher,  
            depending on how much of the current aggregate property  
            transferred to the state is valued over $25, and the claim  
            rate for lower valued property.  For example, if half of the  
            aggregate property currently transferred to the state in a  
            year has a value of $25 to $50, and the claim rate is one  
            fourth of the overall first year claim rate for escheated  
            property, the first year impact would be $30,400 (based on  
            $12.8 million in aggregate property transferred to the state  
            in 2011-12, and average overall first year claim rate of 1.9%)

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/30/13)

          State Controller John Chiang (source) 

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT :    According to the author, the UPL was  
          created in 1959 to ensure "property owners [are] reunited with  
          their property."  Aggregate reporting makes it at best difficult  
          and inefficient, and at worst, impossible, for the State's  
          Unclaimed Property Program to fulfill its mission in regard to  
          these properties.

          Aggregate holder reporting of unclaimed property allows for  
          several small properties to be added together as one amount  
          without the reporting of the actual property owner's individual  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          6

          owner information even when the holder is in possession of this  
          information.  This includes important information that could  
          otherwise be reported such as [an] owner name, address, account  
          number, and social security number.  Without this information,  
          the SCO task of reuniting this property with its rightful owner  
          is a nearly impossible task.

          Aggregate reporting presents many challenges for the Unclaimed  
          Property Program in achieving its mission to reunite lost and  
          abandoned property with the rightful owner.  Since current  
          statute does not require holders to report owner information on  
          accounts valued at less than $50, aggregate properties are not  
          itemized within the unclaimed property database or displayed on  
          the website for owners to search via the SCO public website and  
          claim their properties.  If by chance an owner does learn that  
          they have an aggregate property, many complexities ensue for  
          both holders and the SCO in researching these properties and  
          proving entitlement when a claim is made.  Often times when a  
          customer calls to make an inquiry regarding an aggregate  
          property, the State will refer them back to the holder and  
          conversely, the holder will refer them back to the State.  This  
          back and forth creates a great deal of frustration for the  
          property owner and inspires very little public confidence [in]  
          the Unclaimed Property Program or the holder.

          In 2011-12, the Controller had over $12.8 million transferred to  
          the state in aggregate, without any property owner information  
          at all.  Over the past five years, the total is over $68  
          million.

          This bill would greatly reduce the problem by requiring holders  
          to submit detailed owner information, when available, for all  
          [unclaimed] properties valued at $25 or more.  Having the  
          detailed owner information will significantly increase the  
          likelihood that these properties will be returned to the  
          rightful owner."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  54-22, 5/29/13
          AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Blumenfield,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly, Dickinson,  
            Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hernández, Jones-Sawyer, Levine,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 212
                                                                     Page  
          7

            Lowenthal, Medina, Mitchell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,  
            Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams,  
            Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES: Allen, Bigelow, Chávez, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth  
            Gaines, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Logue, Maienschein,  
            Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Nestande, Olsen, Patterson,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Gorell, Holden, Linder, Vacancy


          AL:nl  8/30/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****





























                                                                CONTINUED