BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 217|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 217
          Author:   Bradford (D), et al.
          Amended:  9/6/13 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES & COMMUNICATIONS COMM  :  8-2, 7/2/13
          AYES:  Padilla, Corbett, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Hill, Pavley,  
            Wolk, Wright
          NOES:  Fuller, Knight
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cannella

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/30/13
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  54-23, 5/30/13 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Electricity:  solar electricity:  low-income  
          households

           SOURCE  :     GRID Alternatives


           DIGEST  :    This bill extends the low-income programs of the  
          California Solar Initiative (CSI) from 2016 until 2021,  
          authorizes the collection of an additional $108 million for  
          these programs, and adds additional standards to the program, as  
          specified.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 9/6/13 add language to address  
          chaptering out issues with AB 102 (Assembly Budget Committee)  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          2

          and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee's SB 72, SB  
          84, and SB 96.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1.Creates CSI with a goal to install solar energy systems with a  
            generation capacity of 3,000 megawatts, to make solar energy  
            systems a viable mainstream option for both homes and  
            businesses in 10 years, and to place solar energy systems on  
            50% of new homes in 13 years.

          2.Specifies no less than 10% of the overall CSI funding is to be  
            directed toward programs assisting low-income households in  
            obtaining the benefits of solar technology.

          3.Establishes a $217 million budget within CSI program to fund  
            the low-income solar rebate program. 

          4.Permits the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to adopt  
            decisions that established the Single-Family Affordable Solar  
            Homes Program (SASH) and the Multifamily Affordable Solar  
            Housing Program (MASH), which provide monetary incentives for  
            the installation of solar energy systems on low-income  
            residential housing.

          5.States SASH and MASH programs will operate until December 31,  
            2015, or until budgeted funds are exhausted, whichever occurs  
            sooner.

          This bill:

          1.Extends the low-income programs of the CSI from 2016 until  
            2021, and makes legislative findings and declarations that it  
            is the goal of the state to install solar energy systems that  
            have a generating capacity equivalent to 50 megawatts for  
            low-income residential housing.

          2.Funds the program up to $108 million collected from customers  
            of investor-owned utilities, as specified.

          3.Requires eligible participants to enroll in the utility Energy  
            Savings Assistance Program.







                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          3


          4.Requires the PUC to determine program elements to maximize  
            overall benefit to ratepayers.

          5.Sunsets the program December 31, 2021.

          6.Makes a number of declarations and legislative findings.

          7.Adds language to address chaptering out issues with AB 102  
            (Assembly Budget Committee) and the Senate Budget and Fiscal  
            Review Committee's SB 72, SB 84, and SB 96.

           Background
           
           The California Solar Initiative  .  The CSI was established in  
          2007 to fund multiple programs to increase customer use of solar  
          power throughout California, including through the  
          investor-owned utilities (IOUs), the publicly-owned utilities,  
          and through the New Solar Homes Partnership.  The IOUs were  
          approved for 10 years of funding with a $2.167 billion budget  
          overall and a goal of installing 1,940 MW of new solar  
          generation capacity through a general market program, the CSI  
          thermal program, or SASH and MASH programs. 

          The SASH and MASH programs were originally established by the  
          PUC with a total budget of $217 million, and subsidize solar  
          photovoltaic systems for low-income single- and multi-family  
          homes, respectively.  The PUC adopted an incentive structure  
          that provides a fully-subsidized 1 kilowatt photovoltaic solar  
          energy system to "very-low income" households and a partial  
          subsidy for qualified "low-income" households.  The goal is to  
          provide access to solar energy systems to decrease electricity  
          bills without increasing household expenses. 

          GRID Alternatives is a non-profit solar installer and manages  
          the SASH and MASH programs on behalf of the IOUs and the PUC.   
          GRID Alternatives works with volunteers and workforce training  
          programs to install solar generation systems and simultaneously  
          educate students.  Over 60 community job training programs  
          statewide have utilized SASH solar installations for hands on  
          training experience.  GRID Alternatives reports that combined,  
          the SASH and MASH programs have served 2,765 single-family  
          households and 322 multi-site developments throughout California  
          and provided $125 million in incentives.  







                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          4


          The PUC reports that at the end of 2012 under the SASH program,  
          2,487 photovoltaic systems had been installed and  
          interconnected, 301 projects had been reserved, and 351  
          applications were under review.  Over 26 megawatts of power  
          capacity have been or are reserved to be installed by the SASH  
          and MASH programs.  GRID Alternatives conducts an energy audit  
          for every SASH applicant before installing solar photovoltaic  
          systems.  Some participants enroll in the Energy Savings  
          Assistance Program, a utility-operated program that provides  
          no-cost weatherization services to low-income households. 

           Cost-effectiveness  .  The SASH and MASH programs are evaluated  
          every two years.  The PUC contracted Navigant Consulting to  
          perform this evaluation for the 2009-2010 years of the programs.  
           Navigant Consulting determined that the SASH program was  
          cost-effective from the perspective of the participants, but not  
          from the societal, program administrator, ratepayer, or total  
          resource perspectives. The SASH and MASH programs should have an  
          additional review covering the 2011-12 years, but this review is  
          not yet available.

           Comments
           
          The author proposes to extend the SASH and MASH programs beyond  
          their current sunset in order to support low-income residents  
          who have high energy demands. By subsidizing their energy needs,  
          the cost of electricity for participants freeing up much needed  
          family income for other essentials.  The author proposes to use  
          remaining funding from the CSI program after it expires in 2016  
          to fund the continued SASH and MASH programs through 2021.  In  
          addition to the leftover funds, the bill authorizes raising  
          funds from ratepayers and capping the combined total to $108  
          million.  The author argues that GRID Alternatives has  
          successfully implemented SASH and MASH by installing rooftop  
          solar energy systems for low-income residents, and by providing  
          students and at-risk youth with hands-on workforce training. For  
          these reasons, the author argues the programs should be  
          extended. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:







                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          5


           Annual costs of $50,000 from the Public Utilities  
            Reimbursement Account through 2021 for the administration of  
            the low-income programs of the CSI.

           Annual costs of approximately $260,000 from General Fund and  
            various special funds for CSI surcharges paid by the state as  
            an IOU customer.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/9/13)

          GRID Alternatives (source) 
          American Solar Power
          Avalon Gardens Community Organization
          Bright Sky Solar Holdings, LLC
          California Center for Sustainable Energy
          Capital City Solar
          Central Valley Opportunity Center
          Century Housing
          ChangeFire
          Cities of Beaumont, Palmdale, Rancho Cucamonga, and Richmond
          Community Development Block Grant Division - City of Inglewood
          Delta Solar Electric Inc.
          Division of Ratepayer Advocates
          Enterprise Community Partners
          Environmental Defense Fund
          Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission
          Friends and Neighbors Community Club
          Garfield Elementary School
          GigaWatt
          Green Education Inc.
          Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc.
          HelioPower Inc.
          Imani Energy, Inc
          In Solar
          Kathleen J. DeRosa, Cathedral City Mayor
          La Jolla Band of LuiseDo Indians
          Lifestyle Solar Inc.
          Los Angeles Conservation Corps.
          Los Angeles Trade Technical College
          Marti Emerald, San Diego 9th District Councilmember
          Mendocino Solar Service
          Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry
          NRG Energy







                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          6

          OC Sunny
          Pinoleville Pomo Nation
          Proteus Inc.
          ProVoltz Inc.
          Rebuilding Together Oakland
          Renewable Energy Education Solutions
          Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians
          San Francisco Department of the Environment
          San Gabriel Valley Habitat for Humanity
          Save a Lot Solar
          Self-Help Enterprises
          Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District
          Sierra Club California
          Solar Energy Exchange Inc.
          Solar Energy Industries Association
          Solar Sonoma County
          SolarReserve
          SOLEX
          Strategic Energy Innovations
          Sullivan Solar Power
          SUTECH School of Vocational and Technical Training
          Venice Community Housing
          Venice YouthBuild
          Verengo Inc.
          Veterans Green Jobs
          Westside Baptist Church
          YouthPower Community Solutions

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 54-23, 05/30/13
          AYES: Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong,  
            Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell,  
            Gray, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal,  
            Medina, Mitchell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Pan, Perea, V.  
            Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner,  
            Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A.  
            P�rez
          NOES: Achadjian, Allen, Bigelow, Ch�vez, Conway, Dahle,  
            Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Linder,  
            Logue, Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Nestande,  
            Olsen, Patterson, Wagner, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Holden, Waldron, Vacancy








                                                                     AB 217
                                                                     Page  
          7


          JG:nl  9/9/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****