BILL NUMBER: AB 227 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 9, 2013
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Gatto
FEBRUARY 4, 2013
An act to amend Section 25249.7 of the Health and Safety Code,
relating to toxic substances.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 227, as amended, Gatto. Proposition 65: enforcement:
chemical listing. enforcement.
(1) The existing Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of
1986 (Proposition 65) prohibits any person, in the course of doing
business, from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to
a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive
toxicity without giving a specified warning, or from knowingly
discharging or releasing such a chemical into water or any source of
drinking water, except as specified. The act imposes civil penalties
upon persons who violate those prohibitions, and provides for the
enforcement of those prohibitions by the Attorney General, a district
attorney, or specified city attorneys or prosecutors, and by any
person in the public interest. The act requires any person bringing
an action in the public interest, or any private person filing an
action in which a violation of the act is alleged, to notify the
Attorney General, the district attorney, city attorney, or prosecutor
in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred, and
the alleged violator that such an action has been filed.
This bill would allow a person who receives a notice that alleges
the person is in violation of the warning requirements of Proposition
65 to correct the violation within 14 days after receiving that
notice and demonstrate to the Attorney General, the city
attorney, or the district attorney in whose jurisdiction the notice
is filed that the violation has been corrected serve
on the person that sent the notice a written statement, signed under
penalty of perjury, that describes the corrective actions and to
which is attached a copy of the posted warnings . The bill
would prohibit an enforcement action from being commenced by
a person in the public interest if the
Attorney General, the city attorney, or the district attorney concurs
that the violation has been corrected person
receiving the notice of alleged violation takes those actions .
The Since the commission of perjury is a
crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local
program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with
regard to concurring in that correction of a violation
creating a new crime .
(2) Proposition 65 provides that it may be amended by a statute,
passed in each house by 2/3 vote, to further its purposes.
This bill would find and declare that it furthers the purposes of
Proposition 65.
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these
statutory provisions.
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 25249.7 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
25249.7. (a) A person who violates or threatens to violate
Section 25249.5 or 25249.6 may be enjoined in any court of competent
jurisdiction.
(b) (1) A person who has violated Section 25249.5 or 25249.6 is
liable for a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred
dollars ($2,500) per day for each violation in addition to any other
penalty established by law. That civil penalty may be assessed and
recovered in a civil action brought in any court of competent
jurisdiction.
(2) In assessing the amount of a civil penalty for a violation of
this chapter, the court shall consider all of the following:
(A) The nature and extent of the violation.
(B) The number of, and severity of, the violations.
(C) The economic effect of the penalty on the violator.
(D) Whether the violator took good faith measures to comply with
this chapter and the time these measures were taken.
(E) The willfulness of the violator's misconduct.
(F) The deterrent effect that the imposition of the penalty would
have on both the violator and the regulated community as a whole.
(G) Any other factor that justice may require.
(c) Actions pursuant to this section may be brought by the
Attorney General in the name of the people of the State of
California, by a district attorney, by a city attorney of a city
having a population in excess of 750,000, or, with the consent of the
district attorney, by a city prosecutor in a city or city and county
having a full-time city prosecutor, or as provided in subdivision
(d).
(d) Actions pursuant to this section may be brought by a person in
the public interest if both of the following requirements are met:
(1) The private action is commenced more than 60 days from the
date that the person has given notice of an alleged violation of
Section 25249.5 or 25249.6 that is the subject of the private action
to the Attorney General and the district attorney, city attorney, or
prosecutor in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have
occurred, and to the alleged violator. If the notice alleges a
violation of Section 25249.6, the notice of the alleged violation
shall include a certificate of merit executed by the attorney for the
noticing party, or by the noticing party, if the noticing party is
not represented by an attorney. The certificate of merit shall state
that the person executing the certificate has consulted with one or
more persons with relevant and appropriate experience or expertise
who has reviewed facts, studies, or other data regarding the exposure
to the listed chemical that is the subject of the action, and that,
based on that information, the person executing the certificate
believes there is a reasonable and meritorious case for the private
action. Factual information sufficient to establish the basis of the
certificate of merit, including the information identified in
paragraph (2) of subdivision (h), shall be attached to the
certificate of merit that is served on the Attorney General.
(2) Neither the Attorney General, a district attorney, a city
attorney, nor a prosecutor has commenced and is diligently
prosecuting an action against the violation.
(e) A person bringing an action in the public interest pursuant to
subdivision (d) and a person filing an action in which a violation
of this chapter is alleged shall notify the Attorney General that the
action has been filed. Neither this subdivision nor the procedures
provided in subdivisions (f) to (j), inclusive, affect the
requirements imposed by statute or a court decision in existence on
January 1, 2002, concerning whether a person filing an action in
which a violation of this chapter is alleged is required to comply
with the requirements of subdivision (d).
(f) (1) A person filing an action in the public interest pursuant
to subdivision (d), a private person filing an action in which a
violation of this chapter is alleged, or a private person settling a
violation of this chapter alleged in a notice given pursuant to
paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), shall, after the action or
violation is subject either to a settlement or to a judgment, submit
to the Attorney General a reporting form that includes the results of
that settlement or judgment and the final disposition of the case,
even if dismissed. At the time of the filing of a judgment pursuant
to an action brought in the public interest pursuant to subdivision
(d), or an action brought by a private person in which a violation of
this chapter is alleged, the plaintiff shall file an affidavit
verifying that the report required by this subdivision has been
accurately completed and submitted to the Attorney General.
(2) A person bringing an action in the public interest pursuant to
subdivision (d), or a private person bringing an action in which a
violation of this chapter is alleged, shall, after the action is
either subject to a settlement, with or without court approval, or to
a judgment, submit to the Attorney General a report that includes
information on any corrective action being taken as a part of the
settlement or resolution of the action.
(3) The Attorney General shall develop a reporting form that
specifies the information that shall be reported, including, but not
limited to, for purposes of subdivision (e), the date the action was
filed, the nature of the relief sought, and for purposes of this
subdivision, the amount of the settlement or civil penalty assessed,
other financial terms of the settlement, and any other information
the Attorney General deems appropriate.
(4) If there is a settlement of an action brought by a person in
the public interest under subdivision (d), the plaintiff shall submit
the settlement, other than a voluntary dismissal in which no
consideration is received from the defendant, to the court for
approval upon noticed motion, and the court may approve the
settlement only if the court makes all of the following findings:
(A) The warning that is required by the settlement complies with
this chapter.
(B) The award of attorney's fees is reasonable under California
law.
(C) The penalty amount is reasonable based on the criteria set
forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(5) The plaintiff subject to paragraph (4) has the burden of
producing evidence sufficient to sustain each required finding. The
plaintiff shall serve the motion and all supporting papers on the
Attorney General, who may appear and participate in a proceeding
without intervening in the case.
(6) Neither this subdivision nor the procedures provided in
subdivision (e) and subdivisions (g) to (j), inclusive, affect the
requirements imposed by statute or a court decision in existence on
January 1, 2002, concerning whether claims raised by a person or
public prosecutor not a party to the action are precluded by a
settlement approved by the court.
(g) The Attorney General shall maintain a record of the
information submitted pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f) and shall
make this information available to the public.
(h) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the basis for the
certificate of merit required by subdivision (d) is not discoverable.
However, nothing in this subdivision precludes the discovery of
information related to the certificate of merit if that information
is relevant to the subject matter of the action and is otherwise
discoverable, solely on the ground that it was used in support of the
certificate of merit.
(2) Upon the conclusion of an action brought pursuant to
subdivision (d) with respect to a defendant, if the trial court
determines that there was no actual or threatened exposure to a
listed chemical, the court may, upon the motion of that alleged
violator or upon the court's own motion, review the basis for the
belief of the person executing the certificate of merit, expressed in
the certificate of merit, that an exposure to a listed chemical had
occurred or was threatened. The information in the certificate of
merit, including the identity of the persons consulted with and
relied on by the certifier, and the facts, studies, or other data
reviewed by those persons, shall be disclosed to the court in an
in-camera proceeding at which the moving party shall not be present.
If the court finds that there was no credible factual basis for the
certifier's belief that an exposure to a listed chemical had occurred
or was threatened, then the action shall be deemed frivolous within
the meaning of Section 128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The
court shall not find a factual basis credible on the basis of a legal
theory of liability that is frivolous within the meaning of Section
128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(i) The Attorney General may provide the factual information
submitted to establish the basis of the certificate of merit on
request to a district attorney, city attorney, or prosecutor within
whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred, or to
any other state or federal government agency, but in all other
respects the Attorney General shall maintain, and ensure that all
recipients maintain, the submitted information as confidential
official information to the full extent authorized in Section 1040 of
the Evidence Code.
(j) In an action brought by the Attorney General, a district
attorney, a city attorney, or a prosecutor pursuant to this chapter,
the Attorney General, district attorney, city attorney, or prosecutor
may seek and recover costs and attorney's fees on behalf of a party
who provides a notice pursuant to subdivision (d) and who renders
assistance in that action.
(k) (1) A person who receives a notice
pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) that alleges the person
is in violation of Section 25249.6 may, prior to the commencement of
an enforcement action, correct do both of the
following:
(A) Correct the violation within
14 days after receiving that notice and demonstrate to the
Attorney General, the city attorney, or the district attorney in
whose jurisdiction the notice is filed that the violation has been
corrected. An enforcement action shall not be commenced if the
Attorney General, the city attorney, or the district attorney concurs
that the violation has been corrected. notice.
(B) Serve on the person that sent the
notice a written statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that
fully describes the corrective actions taken and to which is attached
a true and correct copy of any posted warnings.
(2) An enforcement action shall not be
commenced by a person in the public interest pursuant to subdivision
(d) if the person receiving the notice alleging the violation
complies with subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1).
(3) This subdivision shall not prevent the Attorney General, a
district attorney, a city attorney, or a prosecutor in whose
jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred from filing an
action pursuant to subdivision (c) against an alleged violator.
SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that this act furthers
the purposes of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of
1986 (Chapter 6.6 (commencing with Section 25249.5) of Division 20 of
the Health and Safety Code).
SEC. 3. If the Commission on State Mandates
determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs
shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of
Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act
pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local
agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a
new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or
changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of
Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a
crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the
California Constitution.