California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 248


Introduced by Assembly Member Gorell

February 6, 2013


An act relating to energy.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 248, as introduced, Gorell. Energy: powerplants: Ventura County.

Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards regulate water quality in accordance with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (act) and the federal Clean Water Act. Under the act, the state board is required to adopt specified state policies with respect to water quality as it relates to the coastal marine environment, including a policy requiring new or expanded coastal powerplants and other industrial installations using seawater for cooling, heating, or industrial processing to use the best available site, design, technology, and mitigation measures feasible to minimize the intake and mortality of all forms of marine life.

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation that would require the Public Utilities Commission and the Independent System Operator, in consultation with specified entities, to submit to the Legislature, before January 1, 2015, a report on policies, recommended legislative actions, and incentives necessary to accomplish specified objectives related to once-through cooling powerplants in Ventura County while preserving and enhancing electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and Ventura.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(1) Ventura County possesses unique environmental resources
4including miles of coast lines, working agricultural lands, valleys,
5coastal mountains and the distant Channel Islands. These resources
6create six distinct microclimates and provide unique habitat, flora,
7fauna, and marine resources for the various species that share the
8county. Additionally, they provide a wide variety of recreational
9opportunities and the base for a superior quality of life in the
10communities beyond Ventura County.

11(2) California should promote public policies that create jobs
12and foster economic growth while maintaining quality of life.
13Ventura County needs policies that preserve its global
14competitiveness and allows business to grow, invest, and create
15jobs. These policies should encourage innovation while promoting
16economic prosperity. Ventura County has a unique blend of
17industries to protect and promote. The employment base is secured
18by agriculture, tourism, international trade, and manufacturing
19industries, with growth occurring in the high-tech, medical, science,
20and service sectors. All of these industries need affordable, reliable
21electricity to prosper.

22(3) In 2010, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
23adopted its Statewide Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of
24Coastal and Estuaries Waters for Power Plant Cooling, commonly
25referred to as the “Once-Through Cooling Policy.” Two generation
26facilities in Ventura County are subject to the Once-Through
27Cooling Policy.

28(4) To comply with the Once-Through Cooling Policy, an owner
29or operator of an existing powerplant must reduce intake flowrate
30at each unit, at a minimum, to a level commensurate with that
31which can be attained by a closed-cycle wet cooling system, by
32facility-specific deadlines prescribed in the policy. Alternatively,
33if an owner or operator demonstrates that compliance with this
34standard is not feasible, that owner or operator must reduce
35impingement mortality and entrainment of marine life for the
36facility to a comparable level to that which would be achieved
37under the first standard, using operational or structural controls,
38or both.

P3    1(5) Pursuant to the Once-Through Cooling Policy, the SWRCB
2impaneled a Statewide Advisory Committee on Cooling Water
3Intake Structures (SACCWIS), including representatives from the
4Public Utilities Commission, the State Energy Resources
5Conservation and Development Commission, the Independent
6 System Operator, the California Coastal Commission, the State
7Lands Commission, the State Air Resources Board, and SWRCB
8staff, to advise the SWRCB on the implementation of the policy
9to ensure that the implementation schedule takes into account local
10 area and grid reliability.

11(6) Electricity reliability is critical to California’s economy,
12security, and stability of modern life. It is the top priority for
13California’s electrical energy policy to preserve electric reliability
14and maintain regional system integrity. Ventura County and Santa
15Barbara County rely on transmission imports across a narrow
16corridor that is at risk of outages caused by natural disasters,
17including earthquakes and fires. During these events, electric
18reliability in this area depends on service from existing flexible
19generation units that are subject to the Once-Through Cooling
20Policy. Generation and transmission operation in California must
21be monitored and controlled in real time to ensure a consistent and
22ample flow of electricity. It is designed with system redundancies
23to prevent outages during emergencies, such as fires, grid failure,
24or maintenance.

25(b) It is intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation
26that would require the Public Utilities Commission and the
27Independent System Operator, in consultation with the SWRCB,
28the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development
29Commission, the California Coastal Commission, the State Lands
30Commission, the State Air Resources Board, and other relevant
31local and federal authorities, to submit a report, before January 1,
322014, to the Legislature on a study and evaluation of what policies,
33legislative actions, and other federal, state, and local incentives
34are necessary to accomplish, while preserving and enhancing
35electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and
36Ventura, all of the following objectives:

37(1) To ensure the preservation of Ventura County’s
38environmental resources, tourism, and economic development by
39decommissioning the existing once-through cooling powerplants
40or by facilitating the replacement of existing once-through cooling
P4    1powerplants in Ventura County with more modern powerplant
2while reducing visual impacts and ensuring that sufficient reserve
3capacity is available in the local capacity reliability area.

4(2) To review the potential of acquisition of the properties on
5which the once-through cooling powerplants are located by the
6City of Oxnard, the County of Ventura, the state, or other
7responsible entities for the preservation as a natural resources in
8the California coastal zone.

9(3) To uphold contractual obligations and economic interests
10of the current owners and operators of the once-through cooling
11powerplants in the Big Creek/Ventura local capacity reliability
12area.

13(4) To modify the cooling technologies at the once-through
14cooling powerplants in Ventura County to mitigate impacts on
15marine environment, consistent with the Once-Through Cooling
16Policy and other existing policies.

17(5) To identify potential sites in Ventura County appropriate
18for once-through cooling powerplants that would not impose
19greater environmental, agricultural, or economic impacts, or greater
20costs to the electricity ratepayer, as compared to the redevelopment
21or replacement of the existing powerplants.



O

    99