AB 248, as amended, Gorell. Energy: powerplants: Ventura County.
Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards regulate water quality in accordance with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (act) and the federal Clean Water Act. Under the act, the state board is required to adopt specified state policies with respect to water quality as it relates to the coastal marine environment, including a policy requiring new or expanded coastal powerplants and other industrial installations using seawater for cooling, heating, or industrial processing to use the best available site, design, technology, and mitigation measures feasible to minimize the intake and mortality of all forms of marine life.
This billbegin delete would state the intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation thatend delete
would require the Public Utilities Commission and the Independent System Operator, in consultation with specified entities, to submit to the Legislature,begin insert on orend insert before January 1, 2015, a report on policies, recommended legislative actions, and incentives necessary to accomplish specified objectives related to once-through cooling powerplants in Ventura County while preserving and enhancing electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and Ventura.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Ventura.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin delete(a)end deletebegin delete end deleteThe Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(1)
end delete
4begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insert Ventura County possesses unique environmental resources
5including miles of coast lines, working agricultural lands, valleys,
6coastal mountainsbegin insert,end insert and the distant Channel Islands. These resources
7create six distinct microclimates and provide unique habitat, flora,
8fauna, and marine resources for the various species that share the
9county. Additionally, they provide a wide variety of recreational
10opportunities and the base for a superior quality of life in the
11communities beyond Ventura County.
12(2)
end delete
13begin insert(b)end insertbegin insert end insert California should promote public policies that create jobs
14and foster economic growth while maintaining quality of life.
15Ventura County needs policies that preserve its global
16competitiveness andbegin delete allows businessend deletebegin insert allow businessesend insert to grow,
17invest, and create jobs. These policies should encourage innovation
18while promoting economic prosperity. Ventura County has a unique
19blend of industries to protect and promote. The employment base
20is secured by agriculture, tourism, international trade, and
21
manufacturing industries, with growth occurring in the high-tech,
22medical, science, and service sectors. All of these industries need
23affordable, reliable electricity to prosper.
24(3)
end delete
25begin insert(c)end insertbegin insert end insert In 2010, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
26adopted its Statewide Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of
27Coastal and Estuaries Waters for Power Plant Cooling, commonly
28referred to as the
“Once-Through Cooling Policy.” Two generation
29facilities in Ventura County are subject to the Once-Through
30Cooling Policy.
31(4)
end delete
32begin insert(d)end insertbegin insert end insert To comply with the Once-Through Cooling Policy, an owner
33or operator of an existing powerplant must reduce intake flowrate
P3 1at each unit, at a minimum, to a level commensurate with that
2which can be attained by a closed-cycle wet cooling system, by
3facility-specific
deadlines prescribed in the policy. Alternatively,
4if an owner or operator demonstrates that compliance with this
5standard is not feasible, that owner or operator must reduce
6impingement mortality and entrainment of marine life for the
7facility to a comparable level to that which would be achieved
8under the first standard, using operational or structural controls,
9or both.
10(5)
end delete
11begin insert(e)end insertbegin insert end insert Pursuant
to the Once-Through Cooling Policy, the SWRCB
12impaneled a Statewide Advisory Committee on Cooling Water
13Intake Structures (SACCWIS), including representatives from the
14Public Utilities Commission, the State Energy Resources
15Conservation and Development Commission, the Independent
16
System Operator, the California Coastal Commission, the State
17Lands Commission, the State Air Resources Board, and SWRCB
18staff, to advise the SWRCB on the implementation of the policy
19to ensure that the implementation schedule takes into account local
20area and grid reliability.
21(6)
end delete
22begin insert(f)end insertbegin insert end insert Electricity reliability is critical to California’s economy,
23security, and stability of modern life. It
is the top priority for
24California’s electrical energy policy to preserve electric reliability
25and maintain regional system integrity. Ventura County and Santa
26Barbara County rely on transmission imports across a narrow
27corridor that is at risk of outages caused by natural disasters,
28including earthquakes and fires. During these events, electric
29reliability in this area depends on service from existing flexible
30generation units that are subject to the Once-Through Cooling
31Policy. Generation and transmission operation in California must
32be monitored and controlled in real time to ensure a consistent and
33ample flow of electricity. It is designed with system redundancies
34to prevent outages during emergencies, such as fires, grid failure,
35or maintenance.
36(b) It is intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation
37that would require the Public Utilities Commission and the
38Independent System Operator, in consultation with the SWRCB,
39the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development
40Commission, the California Coastal Commission, the State Lands
P4 1Commission, the State Air Resources Board, and other relevant
2local and federal authorities, to submit a report, before January 1,
32014, to the Legislature on a study and evaluation of what policies,
4legislative actions, and other federal, state, and local incentives
5are necessary to accomplish, while preserving and enhancing
6electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and
7Ventura, all of the following objectives:
8(1) To ensure the preservation of Ventura County’s
9environmental resources, tourism, and economic development by
10decommissioning the existing once-through cooling powerplants
11or by facilitating the replacement of existing once-through cooling
12powerplants in Ventura County with more modern powerplant
13while reducing visual impacts and ensuring that sufficient reserve
14capacity is available in the local capacity reliability area.
15(2) To review the potential of acquisition of the properties on
16which the once-through cooling powerplants are located by the
17City of Oxnard, the County of Ventura, the state, or other
18responsible entities for the preservation as a natural resources in
19the California coastal zone.
20(3) To uphold contractual obligations and economic interests
21of the current owners and operators of the once-through
cooling
22powerplants in the Big Creek/Ventura local capacity reliability
23area.
24(4) To modify the cooling technologies at the once-through
25cooling powerplants in Ventura County to mitigate impacts on
26marine environment, consistent with the Once-Through Cooling
27Policy and other existing policies.
28(5) To identify potential sites in Ventura County appropriate
29for once-through cooling powerplants that would not impose
30greater environmental, agricultural, or economic impacts, or greater
31costs to the electricity ratepayer, as compared to the redevelopment
32or replacement of the existing powerplants.
begin insertSection 321.9 is added to the end insertbegin insertPublic Utilities Codeend insertbegin insert, to
34read:end insert
(a) On or before January 1, 2015, the Public Utilities
36Commission and the Independent System Operator, in consultation
37with the State Water Resources Control Board, the State Energy
38Resources Conservation and Development Commission, the
39California Coastal Commission, the State Lands Commission, the
40State Air Resources Board, and other relevant local and federal
P5 1authorities, shall submit a report to the Legislature, pursuant to
2Section 9795 of the Government Code, on a study and evaluation
3of the policies, legislative actions, and other federal, state, and
4local incentives that are necessary to accomplish, while preserving
5and enhancing electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa
6Barbara and Ventura, all of the following objectives:
7(1) To ensure the preservation of the County of Ventura’s
8environmental resources, tourism, and economic development by
9decommissioning the existing once-through cooling powerplants
10or by facilitating the replacement of existing once-through cooling
11powerplants in the County of Ventura with more modern
12powerplants while reducing visual impacts and ensuring that
13sufficient reserve capacity is available in the local capacity
14reliability area.
15(2) To review the potential of acquisition of the properties on
16which the once-through cooling powerplants are located by the
17City of Oxnard, the County of Ventura, the state, or other
18responsible entities for the preservation of natural resources in
19the California coastal zone.
20(3) To uphold contractual obligations and economic interests
21of the current owners and operators of the once-through cooling
22powerplants in the Big
Creek/Ventura local capacity reliability
23area.
24(4) To modify the cooling technologies at the once-through
25cooling powerplants in the County of Ventura to mitigate impacts
26on marine environments, consistent with the once-through cooling
27policy and other existing policies.
28(5) To identify potential sites in the County of Ventura
29appropriate for once-through cooling powerplants that would not
30impose greater environmental, agricultural, or economic impacts,
31or greater costs to the electricity ratepayer, as compared to the
32redevelopment or replacement of the existing powerplants.
33(b) Pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, this
34section is repealed on January 1, 2019.
The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
36is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
37within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
38Constitution because of the unique environmental resources that
39exist in the County of Ventura.
O
98