AB 260, as introduced, Gordon. Individualized county child care subsidy plans.
Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco and the County of San Mateo, as a pilot projects, to develop and implement individualized county child care subsidy plans for the purpose of ensuring that child care subsidies received in those counties are used to address local needs, conditions, and priorities of working families. The provisions authorizing those pilot programs are similar, but not identical. Existing law repeals the provisions relating to the City and County of San Francisco pilot project on January 1, 2017, and repeals the provisions relating to the San Mateo pilot program on January 1, 2016.
This bill would make those provisions inoperative on July 1, 2014, and as of that date, would authorize those individualized county child care plans to continue in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require the Child Development Division of the State Department of Education to review and approve or disapprove modifications to the plans. The bill would require each county to annually prepare and submit to the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and the State Department of Education a report that contains specified information relating to the success of the county’s plan.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 8335.5 of the Education Code is amended
2to read:
The City and County of San Francisco may implement
4an individualized child care subsidy planbegin insert as a pilot program
5pursuant to this articleend insert until July 1, 2014, at which date the city
6and countybegin delete shall terminate the plan. Between July 1, 2014, and
7July 1, 2016, the city and county shall phase out the individualized
8
county child care subsidy plan and, as of July 1, 2016, shall
9implement the state’s requirements for child care subsidies. A child
10enrolling for the first time for subsidized child care in the city and
11county after July 1, 2014, shall not be enrolled in the pilot program
12established pursuant to this article and is subject to existing state
13laws and regulations regarding child care eligibility and priority.end delete
14begin insert may continue to implement the individualized child care subsidy
15plan in accordance with the requirements of Article 15.4
16(commencing with Section 8347).end insert
Section 8335.7 of the Education Code is amended to
18read:
This article shall become inoperative on July 1,begin delete 2016end delete
20begin insert 2014end insert, and as of January 1,begin delete 2017end deletebegin insert 2015end insert, is repealed, unless a later
21enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1,begin delete 2017end deletebegin insert 2015end insert, deletes
22or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is
23
repealed.
Section 8344 of the Education Code is amended to
25read:
The County of San Mateo may implement its
27individualized county child care subsidy planbegin insert as a pilot program
28pursuant to this articleend insert untilbegin delete Januaryend deletebegin insert Julyend insert 1, 2014, at which date
29the County of San Mateobegin delete shall terminate the plan. Between January begin insert
may continue to implement the
P3 11, 2014, and January 1, 2016, the County of San Mateo shall phase
2out the individualized county child care subsidy plan and, as of
3January 1, 2016, shall implement the state’s requirements for child
4care subsidies. A child enrolling for the first time for subsidized
5child care in San Mateo County after January 1, 2014, shall not
6be enrolled in the pilot program established pursuant to this article
7and is subject to existing state laws and regulations regarding child
8care eligibility and priority.end delete
9individualized child care subsidy plan in accordance with the
10requirements of Article 15.4 (commencing with Section 8347).end insert
Section 8346 of the Education Code is amended to
12read:
This article shallbegin delete remain in effect only until January 1, begin insert become inoperative on July 1, 2014,end insert and as of
142016,end deletebegin delete that dateend delete
15begin insert January 1, 2015,end insert is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which
16is enacted before January 1,begin delete 2016,end deletebegin insert
2015,end insert deletes or extendsbegin delete that begin insert the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealedend insert.
17dateend delete
Article 15.4 (commencing with Section 8347) is added
19to Chapter 2 of Part 6 of Division 1 of Title 1 of the Education
20Code, to read:
21
On and after July 1, 2014, the individualized county
25child care subsidy plans for the County of San Mateo and the City
26and County of San Francisco that were developed as pilot projects
27pursuant to Article 15.2 (commencing with Section 8335) and
28Article 15.3 (commencing with Section 8340), as those articles
29read on January 1, 2013, may continue in existence and may be
30implemented in accordance with the provisions of this article. The
31plans shall ensure that child care subsidies received by the County
32of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco are used
33to address local needs, conditions, and priorities of working
34families in those communities.
For purposes of this article, “county” means the County
36of San Mateo or the City and County of San Francisco.
For purposes of this article, “plan” means an
38individualized county child care subsidy plan developed and
39approved under the pilot projects described in Section 8347, which
40includes all of the following:
P4 1(a) An assessment to identify the county’s goal for its subsidized
2child care system. The assessment shall examine whether the
3current structure of subsidized child care funding adequately
4supports working families in the county and whether the county’s
5child care goals coincide with the state’s requirements for funding,
6eligibility, priority, and reimbursement. The assessment shall also
7identify barriers in the state’s child care subsidy system that inhibit
8the county from meeting its child care goals. In conducting the
9assessment, the county shall consider all of
the following:
10(1) The general demographics of families who are in need of
11child care, including employment, income, language, ethnic, and
12family composition.
13(2) The current supply of available subsidized child care.
14(3) The level of need for various types of subsidized child care
15services, including, but not limited to, infant care, after-hours care,
16and care for children with exceptional needs.
17(4) The county’s self-sufficiency income level.
18(5) Income eligibility levels for subsidized child care.
19(6) Family fees.
20(7) The cost of providing child care.
21(8) The regional market rates, as established by the department,
22for different types of child care.
23(9) The standard reimbursement rate or state per diem for centers
24operating under contracts with the department.
25(10) Trends in the county’s unemployment rate and housing
26affordability index.
27(b) (1) Development of a local policy to eliminate state-imposed
28regulatory barriers to the county’s achievement of its desired
29outcomes for subsidized child care.
30(2) The local policy shall do all of the following:
31(A) Prioritize lowest income families first.
32(B) Follow the family fee schedule established pursuant to
33subdivision (g) of Section 8263 for those families that are income
34eligible, as defined by Section 8263.1.
35(C) Meet local goals that are consistent with the state’s child
36care goals.
37(D) Identify existing policies that would be affected by the
38county’s plan.
39(E) (i) Authorize any agency that provides child care and
40development services in the county through a contract with the
P5 1department to apply to the department to amend existing contracts
2in order to benefit from the local policy.
3(ii) The department shall approve an application to amend an
4existing contract if the plan is modified pursuant to Section 8347.3.
5(iii) The contract of a department contractor who does not elect
6to request an amendment to its contract remains operative and
7enforceable.
8(3) The local policy may supersede state law concerning child
9care subsidy programs with regard only to the following factors:
10(A) Eligibility criteria, including, but not limited to, age, family
11size, time limits, income level, inclusion of former and current
12CalWORKs participants, and special needs considerations, except
13that the local policy may not deny or reduce eligibility of a family
14that qualifies for child care pursuant to Section 8353. Under the
15local policy, a family that qualifies for child care pursuant to
16Section 8354 shall be treated for purposes of eligibility and fees
17in the same manner as a family that qualifies for subsidized child
18care on another basis pursuant to
the local policy.
19(B) Fees, including, but not limited to, family fees, sliding scale
20fees, and copayments for those families that are not income eligible,
21as defined by Section 8263.1.
22(C) Reimbursement rates.
23(D) Methods of maximizing the efficient use of subsidy funds,
24including, but not limited to, multiyear contracting with the
25department for center-based child care, and interagency agreements
26that allow for flexible and temporary transfer of funds among
27agencies.
28(c) Recognition that all funding sources utilized by direct service
29contractors that provide child care and development services in
30the county are eligible to be included in the county’s plan.
31(d) Establishment of measurable
outcomes to evaluate the
32success of the plan to achieve the county’s child care goals, and
33to overcome any barriers identified in the state’s child care subsidy
34system.
(a) Within 30 days of receiving any modification to
36the plan, the Child Development Division shall review and either
37approve or disapprove that modification to the plan.
38(b) The Child Development Division may disapprove only those
39portions of modifications to the plan that are not in conformance
40with this article or that are in conflict with federal law.
(a) The county shall annually prepare and submit to
2the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and the
3department a report that summarizes the success of the county’s
4plan, and the county’s ability to maximize the use of funds and to
5improve and stabilize child care in the county.
6(b) (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
7subdivision (a) is inoperative on January 1, 2018, pursuant to
8Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
9(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall
10be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
11Code.
A participating contractor shall receive any increase
13or decrease in funding that the contractor would have received if
14the contractor had not participated in the plan.
O
99