AB 260, as amended, Gordon. Individualized county child care subsidy plans.
Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco and the County of San Mateo, as a pilot projects, to develop and implement individualized county child care subsidy plans for the purpose of ensuring that child care subsidies received in those counties are used to address local needs, conditions, and priorities of working families. The provisions authorizing those pilot programs are similar, but not identical. Existing law repeals the provisions relating to the City and County of San Francisco pilot project on January 1, 2017, and repeals the provisions relating to the San Mateo pilot program on January 1, 2016.
This bill would require the City and County of San Francisco to terminate the individualized county child care subsidy plan on July 1, 2016, and would require the city and county from July 1, 2016, to July 1, 2018, inclusive, to phase out the plan, and, beginning July 1, 2018, implement the state’s requirements for child care subsidies.
The bill would require the City and County of San Francisco to submit a specified report on the pilot project’s operation between the 2011-12 and 2013-14 fiscal years to the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and the State Department of Education on or before December 31, 2014. The bill would make those provisions relating to the City and County of San Francisco’s individualized county child care subsidy plan inoperative on July 1, 2018, and would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2019.
The bill would make those provisions relating to the County of San Mateo inoperative on July 1, 2014, and as of that date, would authorize the County of San Mateo’s individualized county child care subsidy plan to continue in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require the Child Development Division of the State Department of Education to review and approve or disapprove modifications to the plans. The bill would require each county to annually prepare and submit to the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and the State Department of Education a report that contains specified information relating to the success of the county’s plan.
The bill would also make conforming and related changes and nonsubstantive changes.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 8335.1 of the Education Code is amended
2to read:
Before implementing the local subsidy plan, the City
4and County of San Francisco, in consultation with the department,
5shall develop an individualized county child care subsidy plan for
6the city and county that includes the following four elements:
7(a) An assessment to identify the city and county’s goal for its
8subsidized child care system. The assessment shall examine
9whether the current structure of subsidized child care funding
10adequately supports working families in the city and county and
P3 1whether the city and county’s child care goals coincide with the
2state’s requirements for funding, eligibility, priority, and
3reimbursement. The assessment shall also
identify barriers in the
4state’s child care subsidy system that inhibit the city and county
5from meeting its child care goals. In conducting the assessment,
6the city and county shall consider all of the following:
7(1) The general demographics of families who are in need of
8child care, including employment, income, language, ethnic, and
9family composition.
10(2) The current supply of available subsidized child care.
11(3) The level of need for various types of subsidized child care
12services including, but not limited to, infant care, after-hours care,
13and care for children with exceptional needs.
14(4) The city and county’s self-sufficiency income level.
15(5) Income eligibility levels for subsidized child care.
16(6) Family fees.
17(7) The cost of providing child care.
18(8) The regional market rates, as established by the department,
19for different types of child care.
20(9) The standard reimbursement rate or state per diem for centers
21operating under contracts with the department.
22(10) Trends in the county’s unemployment rate and housing
23affordability index.
24(b) Development of a local policy to eliminate state-imposed
25regulatory
barriers to the city and county’s achievement of its
26desired outcomes for subsidized child care.
27(1) The local policy shall do all of the following:
28(A) Prioritize lowest income families first.
29(B) Follow the family fee schedule established pursuant to
30subdivision (f) of Section 8263 for those families that are income
31eligible, as defined by Section 8263.1.
32(C) Meet local goals that are consistent with the state’s child
33care goals.
34(D) Identify existing policies that would be affected by the city
35and county’s child care subsidy plan.
36(E) (i) Authorize any agency that provides child care and
37development services in the city and county through a contract
38with the department to apply to the department to amend existing
39contracts in order to benefit from the local policy once it is adopted.
P4 1(ii) The department shall approve an application to amend an
2existing contract if the child care subsidy plan is approved pursuant
3to subdivision (b) of Section 8335.3, or modified pursuant to
4subdivision (c) of Section 8335.3.
5(iii) The contract of a department contractor who does not elect
6to request an amendment to its contract remains operative and
7enforceable.
8(2) (A) The city and county shall, by the end of the first
fiscal
9year of operation under the approved child care subsidy plan,
10demonstrate an increase in the aggregate child days of enrollment
11in the county as compared to the enrollment in the final quarter of
12thebegin delete 2010-11end deletebegin insert 2004-05end insert fiscal year.
13(B) The amount of the increase shall be at least equal to the
14aggregate child days of enrollment in the final quarter of the
15begin delete 2010-11end deletebegin insert 2004-05end insert fiscal year for all contracts amended as provided
16in subparagraph (E) of paragraph (1), under which the contractor
17receives
an increase in its reimbursement rate, times 2 percent.
18(C) The amount of the increase shall also be proportional to the
19total contract maximum reimbursable amount to reflect the changes
20in the budget allocation for each fiscal year of the pilotbegin insert projectend insert.
21(3) The local policy may supersede state law concerning child
22care subsidy programs with regard only to the following factors:
23(A) Eligibility criteria including, but not limited to, age, family
24size, time limits, income level, inclusion of former and current
25CalWORKs participants, and special needs considerations, except
26that the local policy may not deny or reduce eligibility of a family
27that
qualifies for child care pursuant to Section 8353. Under the
28local policy, a family that qualifies for child care pursuant to
29Section 8354 shall be treated for purposes of eligibility and fees
30in the same manner as a family that qualifies for subsidized child
31care on another basis pursuant to the local policy.
32(B) Fees including, but not limited to, family fees, sliding scale
33fees, and copayments for those families that are not income eligible,
34as defined by Section 8263.1.
35(C) Reimbursement rates.
36(D) Methods of maximizing the efficient use of subsidy funds,
37including, but not limited to, multiyear contracting with the
38department for center-based child care, and interagency agreements
39that allow for flexible and temporary
transfer of funds among
40agencies.
P5 1(c) Recognition that all funding sources utilized by direct service
2contractors that provide child care and development services in
3the city and county are eligible to be included in the child care
4subsidy plan of the city and county.
5(d) Establishment of measurable outcomes to evaluate the
6success of the plan to achieve the city and county’s child care goals
7and to overcome any barriers identified in the state’s child care
8subsidy system. The State Department of Social Services shall
9have an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed
10measurable outcomes before they are submitted to the local child
11care planning council for approval pursuant to Section 8335.3.
Section 8335.4 of the Education Code is amended to
13read:
(a) Upon approval of the plan by the Child
15Development Division of the department, the City and County of
16San Francisco shall annually prepare and submit to the Legislature,
17the State Department of Social Services, and the department a
18report that summarizes the success of the pilot project and the city
19and county’s ability to maximize the use of funds and to improve
20and stabilize child care in the city and county.
21(b) The City and County of San Francisco shall submit a report
22to the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and
23the department on or before December 31, 2014. The report shall
24summarize the impact of the plan on the child care needs of
25working families
in the city and county, evaluate the pilot project’s
26operation between the 2011-12 and 2013-14 fiscal years, and
27provide a recommendation as to whether the pilot project should
28continue as a permanent program.
Section 8335.5 of the Education Code is amended to
30read:
The City and County of San Francisco may implement
32an individualized county child care subsidy plan as a pilot project
33pursuant to this article until July 1, 2016, at which date the city
34and county
shall terminate the plan. From July 1, 2016begin insert,end insert to July 1,
352018, inclusive, the city and county shall phase out the
36individualized county child care subsidy plan and, beginning July
371, 2018, shall implement the state’s requirements for child care
38subsidies. A child enrolling for the first time for subsidized child
39care in the city and county on and after July 1, 2016, shall not be
40enrolled in the pilot project established pursuant to this article, and
P6 1is subject to existing state laws and regulations regarding child
2care eligibility and priority.
Section 8335.7 of the Education Code is amended to
4read:
This article shall become inoperative on July 1, 2018,
6and as of January 1, 2019, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
7that is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends the dates
8on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed.
Section 8344 of the Education Code is amended to
10read:
The County of San Mateo may implement its
12individualized county child care subsidy plan as a pilot program
13pursuant to this article until July 1, 2014, at which date the County
14of San Mateo may continue to implement the individualized child
15care subsidy plan in accordance with the requirements of Article
1615.4 (commencing with Section 8347).
Section 8346 of the Education Code is amended to
18read:
This article shall become inoperative on July 1, 2014,
20and as of January 1, 2015, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
21which is enacted before January 1, 2015, deletes or extends the
22dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed.
Article 15.4 (commencing with Section 8347) is added
24to Chapter 2 of Part 6 of Division 1 of Title 1 of the Education
25Code, to read:
26
On and after July 1, 2014, the individualized county
30child care subsidy plan for the County of San Mateo that was
31developed as a pilot project pursuant to Article 15.3 (commencing
32with Section 8340), as that article read on January 1, 2013, may
33continue in existence and may be implemented in accordance with
34the provisions of this article. The plan shall ensure that child care
35subsidies received by the County of San Mateo
are used to address
36local needs, conditions, and priorities of working families in those
37communities.
For purposes of this article, “county” means the County
39of San Mateo.
For purposes of this article, “plan” means an
2individualized county child care subsidy plan developed and
3approved under the pilot project described in Section 8347, which
4includes all of the following:
5(a) An assessment to identify the county’s goal for its subsidized
6child care system. The assessment shall examine whether the
7current structure of subsidized child care funding adequately
8supports working families in the county and whether the county’s
9child care goals coincide with the state’s requirements for funding,
10eligibility, priority, and reimbursement. The assessment shall also
11identify barriers in the state’s child care subsidy system that inhibit
12the county from meeting
its child care goals. In conducting the
13assessment, the county shall consider all of the following:
14(1) The general demographics of families who are in need of
15child care, including employment, income, language, ethnic, and
16family composition.
17(2) The current supply of available subsidized child care.
18(3) The level of need for various types of subsidized child care
19services, including, but not limited to, infant care, after-hours care,
20and care for children with exceptional needs.
21(4) The county’s self-sufficiency income level.
22(5) Income eligibility levels for subsidized child care.
23(6) Family fees.
24(7) The cost of providing child care.
25(8) The regional market rates, as established by the department,
26for different types of child care.
27(9) The standard reimbursement rate or state per diem for centers
28operating under contracts with the department.
29(10) Trends in the county’s unemployment rate and housing
30affordability index.
31(b) (1) Development of a local policy to eliminate state-imposed
32regulatory barriers to the county’s achievement of its desired
33outcomes for subsidized child care.
34(2) The local policy shall do all of the following:
35(A) Prioritize lowest income families first.
36(B) Follow the family fee schedule established pursuant to
37subdivision (g) of Section 8263 for those families that are income
38eligible, as defined by Section 8263.1.
39(C) Meet local goals that are consistent with the state’s child
40care goals.
P8 1(D) Identify existing policies that would be affected by the
2county’s plan.
3(E) (i) Authorize any agency that provides child care and
4development services in the county through a contract
with the
5department to apply to the department to amend existing contracts
6in order to benefit from the local policy.
7(ii) The department shall approve an application to amend an
8existing contract if the plan is modified pursuant to Section 8347.3.
9(iii) The contract of a department contractor who does not elect
10to request an amendment to its contract remains operative and
11enforceable.
12(3) The local policy may supersede state law concerning child
13care subsidy programs with regard only to the following factors:
14(A) Eligibility criteria, including, but not limited to, age, family
15size, time limits, income level, inclusion of former and current
16CalWORKs
participants, and special needs considerations, except
17that the local policy may not deny or reduce eligibility of a family
18that qualifies for child care pursuant to Section 8353. Under the
19local policy, a family that qualifies for child care pursuant to
20Section 8354 shall be treated for purposes of eligibility and fees
21in the same manner as a family that qualifies for subsidized child
22care on another basis pursuant to the local policy.
23(B) Fees, including, but not limited to, family fees, sliding scale
24fees, and copayments for those families that are not income eligible,
25as defined by Section 8263.1.
26(C) Reimbursement rates.
27(D) Methods of maximizing the efficient use of subsidy funds,
28including, but not limited to,
multiyear contracting with the
29department for center-based child care, and interagency agreements
30that allow for flexible and temporary transfer of funds among
31agencies.
32(c) Recognition that all funding sources utilized by direct service
33contractors that provide child care and development services in
34the county are eligible to be included in the county’s plan.
35(d) Establishment of measurable outcomes to evaluate the
36success of the plan to achieve the county’s child care goals, and
37to overcome any barriers identified in the state’s child care subsidy
38system.
(a) Within 30 days of receiving any modification to
2the plan, the Child Development Division shall review and either
3approve or disapprove that modification to the plan.
4(b) The Child Development Division may disapprove only those
5portions of modifications to the plan that are not in conformance
6with this article or that are in conflict with federal law.
(a) The county shall annually prepare and submit to
8the Legislature, the State Department of Social Services, and the
9department a report that summarizes the success of the county’s
10plan, and the county’s ability to maximize the use of funds and to
11improve and stabilize child care in the county.
12(b) (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
13subdivision (a) is inoperative on January 1, 2018, pursuant to
14Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
15(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall
16be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
17Code.
A participating contractor shall receive any increase
19or decrease in funding that the contractor would have received if
20the contractor had not participated in the plan.
O
97