BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 267 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 267 (Chau) As Amended April 9, 2013 Majority vote JUDICIARY 8-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Alejo, Chau, | | | | |Dickinson, Garcia, | | | | |Maienschein, Muratsuchi, | | | | |Stone | | | | | | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| |Nays:|Wagner | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Establishes evidentiary privilege to protect the confidentiality of communications between a lawyer referral service (LRS) and its clients. Specifically, this bill , among other things: 1)Establishes that, except as otherwise provided, a client, whether or not a party, has a privilege (hereafter "LRS-client privilege") to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between client and a LRS, if the privilege is properly claimed by the privilege holder, someone authorized by the holder, or in some cases, the LRS. 2)Requires a LRS that has received or made a communication subject to the LRS-client privilege to claim the privilege if the communication is sought to be disclosed and the client has not consented to the disclosure. 3)Provides that the right of any person to claim a LRS privilege created by this bill is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to disclosure made by anyone. 4)Provides there is no privilege in certain situations where the services of the LRS were sought or obtained to enable the commission of a crime or fraud, or where the LRS reasonably AB 267 Page 2 believes that disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm to a person. EXISTING LAW : 1)Provides that it is the duty of an attorney to maintain inviolate the confidence, and at every peril to himself or herself to preserve the secrets, of his or her client unless the attorney reasonably believes the information is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm. 2)Provides that a client of a lawyer has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between the client and lawyer if the privilege is claimed by: a) The holder of the privilege; b) A person who is authorized to claim the privilege by the holder; or, c) The person who was the lawyer at the time of the confidential communication, except as provided. 3)Requires the State Bar, with the approval of the Supreme Court, to formulate and enforce minimum standards for lawyer referral services. FISCAL EFFECT : None COMMENTS : This bill, sponsored by the Conference of California Bar Associations, seeks to establish a new evidentiary privilege to protect the confidentiality of communications between a LRS and its clients. Because prospective clients consult a LRS for the same reason they would consult a lawyer-namely, to obtain legal advice or to seek legal representation-the author reasonably contends that the prospective client in both cases should be able to speak completely candidly about the legal matter, free from fear that any embarrassing or self-incriminating information will be subject to discovery in litigation. Existing law, however, only provides for lawyer-client evidentiary privilege, which does not extend to communications between a LRS and a client. This bill would establish a stand-alone LRS-client privilege modeled after AB 267 Page 3 principles of existing lawyer-client privilege, but with some appropriate differences. According to the author: AB 267 provides needed certainty to current law. There is no specific statutory privilege to keep confidential the information provided by a prospective client to a LRS employee. The confidentiality of this information may be protected under various interpretations of the attorney-client privilege statutes, but it is unclear, and this uncertainty may reduce the efficacy of communications between prospective clients and lawyer referral services. The purpose of the bill is to remove all uncertainty as to whether such communications are protected from discovery in litigation, keep these communications confidential, and to ensure free and candid communication between prospective clients and LRS that will enable the LRS to make the most appropriate referral. A "lawyer referral service" operates for the direct or indirect purpose of referring potential clients to lawyers. (Rule 4, "Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of California Pertaining to Lawyer Referral Services.") The purposes of a LRS include: 1) to provide a way in which any person may be referred to a qualified, insured lawyer who is able to render and is interested in rendering needed legal services; and, 2) to provide information about lawyers and the availability of legal services which will aid the public in their selection of a lawyer. (Rule 5.1.) An entity seeking to qualify as a LRS must register with the State Bar and obtain from the State Bar a certificate of compliance with the minimum standards for lawyer referral services. Certification shall be renewed at least every two years, and denial of certification or recertification may occur if the State Bar determines noncompliance with either statutory requirements or minimum standards governing LRS. In 1989, following a long review process by state and local bar association and lawyer referral experts from the public and private sector, the American Bar Association (ABA) adopted model rules for the operation of public service lawyer referral programs. The model rules are aspirational and intended to provide guidance to state legislatures, but have not been AB 267 Page 4 adopted in California. Nevertheless, Rule XIV of the ABA's "Model Rules Governing Lawyer Referral and Information Services" specifically provides that disclosure of information to a LRS for the purpose of seeking legal assistance shall be deemed a privileged lawyer-client communication. The Commentary to Rule XIV explains: "Since a client discloses information to a lawyer referral service for the sole purpose of seeking the assistance of a lawyer, the client's communication for that purpose should be protected by lawyer-client privilege." This bill would establish a stand-alone LRS privilege that would also accomplish the goal of protecting the confidentiality of communications that a client discloses to a LRS. Recent amendments to this bill are intended to more fully harmonize the proposed LRS-privilege with lawyer-client privilege under existing law, although certain appropriate differences remain. The current bill now establishes consistent and analogous definitions of key terms, describes who holds the privilege, and outlines the precise conditions under which the privilege can be claimed. Analysis Prepared by : Anthony Lew / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0000099