BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 284 

          Date of Hearing:   May 24, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                      AB 284 (Quirk) - As Amended:  May 8, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural  
          ResourcesVote:6-0
                         Utilities and Commerce                      10-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:   
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          1)This bill requires the Air Resources Board (ARB) to convene a  
            Road to 2050 Board consisting of various state agencies and  
            commissions who would be required to submit a report to the  
            Governor and the Legislature every two years, beginning in  
            2016, on the impacts of global warming on public health and  
            natural resources. (Existing law defines 2050 goals as  
            reducing GHG emissions by 80 %from 1990 levels. )  
            Specifically, this bill:

          2)Requires the 2050 Board to consist of representatives from the  
            ARB, California Energy Commission, Public Utilities  
            Commission, California Environmental Protection Agency,  
            California Independent System Operator, two members appointed  
            by the Speaker of the Assembly and two members appointed by  
            the Senate Rules Committee.  
          3)Requires the Board, by January 1, 2016 and every two years  
            after,  to prepare a report to be used on an advisory basis to  
            guide decision making processes and policies at the local and  
            state level to ensure those processes consider implications  
            for meeting the 2050 goals.  

          4)Requires the report to establish consistent metrics to  
            quantify emissions and reductions and to assess the costs and  
            benefits of each reduction program.

          5)Requires the 2050 Board to hold at least one public hearing   
            to receive comment on the report.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  









                                                                  AB 284  

          This bill essentially requires ARB to update its scoping plan  
          every two years including the impact of climate change and an  
          overview of emission reductions efforts to date.

          Based on ARB's state expenditures on the scoping plan required  
          by AB 32, this bill is estimated to cost  up to $5 million  
          annually (special fund) for state positions and contracts to  
          fulfill the requirements of the bill.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose.   According to the author strategies to achieve AB 32  
            goals vary in scope, length and complexity.  One strategy has  
            been the creation of different programs to incentivize the use  
            of energy efficiency, alternative energy and alternative fuel  
            technologies.  However, there lacks a state-wide strategic or  
            cohesive structure to encourage communication and coordination  
            on AB 32-associated programs  

          2)Background.   AB 32 (Núñez), Chapter 455, Statutes of 2006)  
            requires California to limit its emissions of GHGs so that, by  
            2020, those emissions are equal to what they were in 1990.

            AB 32 required ARB to develop a comprehensive scoping plan for  
            achieving the maximum technologically feasible and  
            cost-effective reductions in GHG emission from emission  
            sources or categories of sources by January 1, 2009.  The  
            completed plan identified direct emission reductions and  
            alternative and market-based compliance mechanisms necessary  
            to achieve the 2020 goal.

           3)Beyond 2020.    The prevailing opinion among climate scientists  
            is that achieving an 80 % reduction in GHG emissions compared  
            to 1990 levels by 2050 is necessary to stabilize the global  
            climate.    


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081