BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 300
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 24, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                     AB 300 (Perea) - As Amended:  May 21, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Utilities and  
          Commerce     Vote:                            14-0
                         Revenue and Taxation                   8-0

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable: No           

           SUMMARY

           This bill establishes a new point-of-sale system for collecting  
          and remitting specified fees, surcharges, and taxes applicable  
          to prepaid mobile telephony services (MTS). 
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)The state should realize revenue from 911 and public purpose  
            fees in the range of  $30.5 to $39.4 million (excluding user  
            utility taxes (UUT) resulting in an increase or decrease of up  
            to several million dollars from 2011-12 revenues.  In  
            addition, there will be increased special fund administrative  
            costs, likely in $1 to $2 million range to the BOE and PUC and  
            point of sale retailers.

            This estimate is based on the following assumptions:

             a)   Approximately six million prepaid wireless customers in  
               California.
             b)   BOE estimated 911 and public purpose revenues from  
               prepaid wireless in 2011-12 were in the range of $39  
               million.
             c)   The estimated monthly average revenue per unit (ARPU)  
               ranges between $20 to $25 per prepaid customer which equals  
               approximately $120 to $150 million per month or $1.4 to  
               $1.8 billion per year.  
             d)   The FCC attributes approximately 63% of total wireless  
               traffic to intrastate usage for a total of approximately  
               $882 million to $1.14 billion.
             e)   Total 911 and public purpose rates are approximately  








                                                                  AB 300
                                                                  Page  2

               3.46% 


          1)Board of Equalization (BOE) estimates differ from the  
            committee estimate.  BOE projects this bill will cost over $1  
            million to implement and will result in net annual revenue  
            losses of $10 million to the various 911 and public purpose  
            funds.  

          2)Likewise, according to the PUC, this bill will cost $550,000  
            per year in administrative costs and net annual revenue losses  
            in the range of $2 million to $10 million per year.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose.    Everyone who uses phone service pays a small  
            monthly fee as part of their bill to help fund 911 and support  
            other important state and local programs.  However, for the  
            fastest growing segment of wireless users, prepaid wireless  
            services, there is no collection mechanism for customers to  
            pay these fees.  Nearly 25% of all wireless customers are now  
            prepaid customers.  

            The current system leaves state and local governments without  
            a reliable, predictable means for ensuring collection of these  
            revenues.  AB 300 would ensure state and local governments  
            receive the necessary resources for 911 programs by developing  
            a statewide mechanism to include prepaid services in the  
            already-established collection of fees applied to wireless  
            communication services.

           2)Background  .  The state's current system for collecting taxes  
            and fees is based on monthly bills.  Customers pay 911 fees  
            and state and local fees to fund telephone service for  
            low-income households, broadband for underserved areas, and  
            local government services.
            According to the Wireless Association, the prepaid wireless  
            market is anticipated to grow at a rate of 10% per year.  

           3)Collection of fees and surcharges for prepaid wireless  
            services  .  Current law imposes a state 911 user surcharge on  
            intrastate communications service, administered by the  
            California Technology Agency; a PUC Reimbursement Fee to pay  
            for PUC operations, and several surcharges to pay for state  
            universal service programs administered by the PUC as follows:








                                                                  AB 300
                                                                  Page  3


               a)     California High Cost Fund A and B
               b)     Deaf and Disabled Telecommunications program
               c)     California Teleconnect Fund
               d)     California Advanced Services Fund
               e)     Lifeline Telephone Service

          The BOE estimates state fees total 3.46 percent of intrastate  
          service. There are about 150 different Local 911 fees and User  
          Utility Taxes (UUTs)  assessed on service provided within the  
          jurisdiction of the city or county imposing the tax.  UUTs vary  
          by jurisdiction but not all cities and counties impose them.

          Post-paid fees and surcharges are assessed as they are reflected  
          on customer bills after service is used.  With prepaid service,  
          there is no specific billing process. 
           
            1)PUC concerns.   According to the PUC, it is their  
            responsibility to ensure safe and reliable service at  
            reasonable rates. The PUC contends AB 300 unreasonably  
            replaces the current system for collecting and remitting  
            taxes, surcharges, and fees from prepaid wireless customers  
            with a new system that would cost several million dollars  
            annually to administer, decrease revenue by up to $16 million  
            annually, and increase rates on all telephone service  
            customers. 

            The PUC also argues this bill inappropriately requires that  
            the PUC assess higher surcharges and fees on prepaid wireless  
            customers than on postpaid wireless customers in order to  
            compensate retailers and the BOE for processing prepaid  
            remittances that are currently delivered directly to the CPUC  
            by the carriers at no cost.  

           2)Supporters.   Wireless providers counter the PUC's claim that  
            the bill will reduce the surcharge base by over 20%.   
            According to the sponsors of the bill, PUC calculations are  
            based on an incorrect extension of the ratios used by a single  
            company to the entire industry, significantly overstating the  
            fiscal impact.  Prepaid customers represent approximately 23%  
            of the total number of wireless users, but the average revenue  
            per prepaid user is less than half the average revenue on  
            postpaid customers.  Supporters disagree with the PUC  
            assumption that prepaid services are 22% of the total revenues  
            and assert they are less than half of that figure.    








                                                                  AB 300
                                                                  Page  4

            Proponents argue there will be an increase in revenue  
            resulting from the surcharges being accurately levied on the  
            total retail amount of all the prepaid services.
             
          3)Opposition.   This bill is also opposed by The Utility Reform  
            Network (TURN), the Consumer Federation of California and the  
            Greenlining Institute for the difficulty in implementation and  
            reasons similar to those stated by the PUC.  
                
           4)BOE Staff  Concerns.   BOE staff indicates numerous  
            implementation challenges that still need to be addressed,  
            particularly with the local component.     
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081