BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 337
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 337 (Allen)
          As Amended  January 14, 2014
          Majority vote 

           ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT        8-0 APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Medina, Mansoor, Campos,  |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow, Allen,    |
          |     |Daly, Fong, Fox, Linder,  |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Melendez                  |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
          |     |                          |     |Gomez, Holden, Linder,    |
          |     |                          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Requires the Governor's Office of Business and  
          Economic Development (GO-Biz) to evaluate key issues affecting  
          trade and foreign investment as part of the development of the  
          previously mandated international trade and investment strategy  
          (ITI Strategy).  In undertaking this evaluation, GO-Biz is  
          directed, to the greatest extent possible, to use existing  
          reports and other resources.  The evaluation required by this  
          measure applies to the second update of the strategy, which  
          should occur no later than February 1, 2019.  

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires GO-Biz to provide the Legislature with an ITI  
            Strategy by February 2014 and an updated ITI Strategy at least  
            once every five years.

          2)Requires the ITI Strategy to, at a minimum, include the  
            following:

             a)   Policy, goals, objectives and recommendations;

             b)   Measurable outcomes and timelines for meeting the ITI  
               Strategy goals, objectives, and actions;

             c)   Identification of key stakeholder partnerships that will  
               be used to implement the goals and objectives;









                                                                  AB 337
                                                                  Page  2


             d)   Identification of impediments for achieving the goals  
               and objectives;

             e)   Identification of options for funding recommended  
               actions; and

             f)   Identification of an international trade and investment  
               organizational structure.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this measure will cost GO-Biz $50,000 to implement. 

           COMMENTS  :  Between 2003 and 2006, California had no trade and  
          international marketing authority.  After years of debate, the  
          Legislature and the Governor began an unprecedented  
          collaboration on the development of a new international trade  
          and investment program.  Agreements on the new program were  
          codified in SB 1513 (Romero and Figueroa), Chapter 663, Statutes  
          of 2006, and further refined in AB 2012 (John A. Pérez), Chapter  
          294, Statutes of 2012.  The current ITI Strategy was finalized  
          in August 2008 and the next strategy is due in February 2014.  

           California's Trade Economy   

          California's $2 trillion economy naturally functions as an  
          independent nation and is highly dependent on industry sectors  
          that participate within the larger global economy.  In fact,  
          compared to other nations, California has one of the 10 largest  
          economies in the world, due to it being a top-tier trade  
          partner, a best-in-class investment location, a high quality  
          producer of goods and services, and the home and key access  
          point for a massive consumer-base.  In 2012, California exported  
          $162 billion in products to over 220 foreign countries.  While  
          California has been significantly impacted by the recession,  
          exports continued to increase in almost every quarter from 2010  
          through 2012.

          It is estimated that one in five manufacturing jobs in  
          California is related to trade.  Goods movement supports  
          employment, business profit, and state and local tax revenue.   
          The logistics industry is responsible for hiring 73,000 workers.  
           California businesses rely heavily on the state's ports and  
          their related transportation systems to move manufactured goods.  
           Firms rely on fast, flexible, and reliable shipping to link  








                                                                  AB 337
                                                                  Page  3


          national and global supply chains and bring products to the  
          retail market.  Transportation breakdowns and congestion can  
          idle entire global production networks.

          Changes in U.S. and global trade patterns and the continuing  
          development of foreign markets place challenges on California's  
          goods movement and IT systems.  These challenges are only  
          expected to become greater as the rate of innovation within  
          manufacturing, transportation, and communication technologies  
          gets faster and the ability of multiple geographic locations to  
          successfully use these technologies expands.  

           Doubling Exports in Five Years

           In January 2010, the President announced a national goal of  
          doubling U.S. exports within five years, setting a 2015 target  
          for U.S. exports of $3.14 trillion.  In accomplishing this goal,  
          the federal government has and will continue to implement new  
          programs, targeting existing trade related activities, and  
          increasing funding and technical assistance within its current  
          programs.  

          For California, the second largest exporter of products in the  
          U.S. and the largest receiver of foreign direct investment in  
          the nation, this federal goal could result in significant new  
          trade and investment opportunities.  California has already  
          received nearly $4 million in federal funds to administer a  
          state export assistance program for small businesses.  Since the  
          announcement of the new national goal, exports from California  
          were up $41 billion.  Further, with the upgrading of the Panama  
          Canal and two new broad-based trade agreements being negotiated  
          and implemented (the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the  
          Transatlantic Trade and Investment Agreement), California goods  
          movement infrastructure will face even greater pressure to  
          perform.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Toni Symonds / J., E.D. & E. / (916)  
          319-2090 

                                                                FN: 0003002











                                                                  AB 337
                                                                  Page  4