BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                          SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                                 Carol Liu, Chair
                            2013-2014 Regular Session
                                         

          BILL NO:       AB 349
          AUTHOR:        Gatto
          AMENDED:       May 24, 2013
          FISCAL COMM:   Yes            HEARING DATE:  July 3, 2013
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Lenin Del Castillo
          
          SUBJECT  :  Classified School Employees.
          
           SUMMARY   

          This bill establishes a new process for tracking classified  
          school employees who have a change in employment status as a  
          result of misconduct or while an allegation of misconduct is  
          pending, as specified. 

           BACKGROUND  

          Under the existing Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, all  
          school district teachers and employees are considered to be  
          "mandated reporters."  Mandated reporters are required to  
          report to any law enforcement department knowledge or  
          observations they may have of a child they know or reasonably  
          suspect to have been the subject of child abuse or neglect.   
          The individual report must be made by telephone immediately  
          or as soon as practicable with a written or electronic follow  
          up within 36 hours.  (Penal Code � 11164 et seq.)

          Existing law provides that no person shall be employed or  
          retained in employment by a school district who has been  
          convicted of any sex offense as defined in Section 44010, and  
          specifies that no person shall be employed or retained in  
          employment by a school district who has been convicted of a  
          controlled substance offense as defined in Education Code �  
          44011.  

          Existing law provides that no person who has been convicted  
          of a violent or serious felony shall be employed by a school  
          district; and, specifies that a school district shall not  
          retain in employment a current classified employee who has  
          been convicted of a violent or serious felony, and who is a  
          temporary, substitute, or a probationary employee who has not  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 2


          attained permanent status. 
          (Education Code � 45122.1)

          Existing law provides that the governing board of a school  
          district may employ a person convicted of a controlled  
          substance offense if the governing board of the school  
          district determines, from the evidence presented, that the  
          person has been rehabilitated for at least five years.  The  
          governing board shall determine the type and manner of  
          presentation of the evidence, and the determination of the  
          governing board as to whether or not the person has been  
          rehabilitated is final. 
          (Education Code � 45123)

          Existing law requires the governing board of any school  
          district to require each person to be employed in a position  
          not requiring certification qualifications, except a  
          secondary school pupil employed in a temporary or part-time  
          position by the governing board of the school district having  
          jurisdiction over the school attended by the pupil, to have  
          two fingerprint cards bearing the legible rolled and flat  
          impressions of the person's fingerprints together with a  
          personal description of the applicant prepared by a local  
          public law enforcement agency having jurisdiction in the area  
          of the school district, which agency shall transmit the  
          cards, together with the fee required to the Department of  
          Justice; except that any district, or districts with a common  
          board, may process the fingerprint cards if the district so  
          elects. (Education Code � 45125)

           ANALYSIS  

           This bill  :

          1)   Specifies the intent of the Legislature that the State  
               Department of Education (SDE) and the Commission on  
               Teacher Credentialing (CTC) enter into an interagency  
               agreement for a minimum of three years, in order for the  
               CTC to provide assistance to the SDE in administering  
               the provisions of this bill, as specified.

          2)   Requires the superintendent of a school district or the  
               administrator of a charter school, within 30 days, to  
               report to the SDE when a classified employee is  
               dismissed, suspended, resigns, retires, or is otherwise  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 3


               terminated by a decision not to employ or reemploy as a  
               result of an allegation of misconduct or while an  
               allegation of misconduct is pending.  Provides that a  
               termination by a decision not to employ or reemploy  
               shall not include or be interpreted to include a change  
               of status that is solely for a layoff, as specified. 

          3)   Defines "allegation of misconduct" to mean misconduct  
               that involves any of the acts described in various  
               sections of law, including voluntary manslaughter,  
               robbery, felony convictions, and aiding or abetting the  
               unlawful sale to, use by, or exchange to minors of a  
               controlled substance.

          4)   Defines the term "school district" to include a county  
               office of education.

          5)   Requires the report to SDE to contain all known  
               information about each alleged act of misconduct and  
               include all of the following:

               a)        The name of the classified employee.

               b)        The current address of the classified  
                    employee.

               c)        The name of the reporting school district or  
                    charter school.

               d)        The name of the last school of employment.

               e)        An explanation of the allegation of misconduct  
                    or pending allegation of 
                         misconduct.

               f)        Current contact information for all persons  
                    who may have information 
                         relating to allegation of misconduct.

               g)        Any and all documentation related to the case.

          6)   Requires the report to be made to the State Department  
               of Education (SDE) regardless of any proposed or actual  
               agreement, settlement, or stipulation not to make such a  
               report.  Provides that the report shall also be made if  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 4


               allegations of misconduct served on the employee are  
               withdrawn in consideration of the employee's  
               resignation, retirement, or other failure to contest the  
               truth of the allegations.  Requires that SDE shall  
               maintain these reports by county and by the employee's  
               name, in a searchable format.  Provides that this  
               information shall not be made available to the general  
               public.

          7)   Requires the superintendent of an employing school  
               district or a charter school administrator, in writing,  
               to inform a classified employee of the content of this  
               section if that employee is dismissed, resigns, is  
               suspended, retires, or is otherwise terminated by a  
               decision not to employ or reemploy, as a result of an  
               allegation of misconduct or while an allegation of  
               misconduct is pending.

          8)   Requires the SDE to establish procedures to determine  
               whether a decision to dismiss, suspend, or not to employ  
               or reemploy a classified employee, or when an employee  
               resigns or retires, as a result of an allegation of  
               misconduct or while an allegation of misconduct is  
               pending, is proven unfounded or substantiated.  Provides  
               that if the SDE determines the allegation of misconduct  
               is proved unfounded, the classified employee's name  
               shall not be included in reports established pursuant to  
               this section.

               a)        Specifies that for purposes of this section,  
                    "unfounded" means a report that is determined by  
                    the SDE to be false, to involve an accidental  
                    injury, or to not constitute misconduct based on  
                    the preponderance of the evidence.  

               b)        Specifies that for purposes of this section,  
                    "substantiated" means a report determined by the  
                    SDE to constitute misconduct, based upon a  
                    preponderance of the evidence.

               c)        Provides that if a school district or charter  
                    school initiates an investigation against a  
                    classified employee for allegations of misconduct,  
                    the school district or charter school shall provide  
                    the SDE with all relevant information pertinent to  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 5


                    this investigation.

          9)   Makes the finding and declaration of the Legislature  
               that this act imposes a limitation on the public's right  
               of access to the meetings of public bodies or the  
               writings of public officials and agencies within the  
               meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California  
               Constitution.  Provides that pursuant to this  
               constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the  
               finding that in order to protect sensitive employment  
               matters, it is necessary that this act take effect with  
               the limitation on public access to certain reports, as  
               specified, to demonstrate the interest protected by this  
               limitation and the need for protecting the interest.      
                 

          STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Need for the bill  .  According to the author, classified  
               school employees serve in a number of roles essential to  
               California's public school system, working in positions  
               such as office and administrative personnel,  
               groundskeepers, campus aides, librarians, security  
               officers, counselors, food service workers, and bus  
               drivers.  In 2010, there were more than 265,000  
               classified employees working in more than 1,000 school  
               districts in California's public school system.  In  
               2012, almost 30,400 classified employees worked for the  
               Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) alone, the  
               largest district in the state serving more than 659,200  
               elementary, middle, and high school students.  This bill  
               is intended to align the reporting requirements for  
               allegations of misconduct involving a child as they  
               pertain to classified school employees with those  
               established for certificated teachers, thereby creating  
               a centralized, statewide information system.  

           2)   State Auditor Report  .  Spurred by numerous accounts of  
               child abuse in LAUSD that remained unreported for years,  
               the Joint Legislative Audit Committee requested an audit  
               of LAUSD's process for handling allegations of employee  
               abuse against students.  In November 2012, the  
               California State Auditor completed and released a report  
               titled "Los Angeles Unified School District: It Could Do  
               More to Improve Its Handling of Child Abuse  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 6


               Allegations."   The report included a recommendation for  
               the Legislature to consider establishing a mechanism to  
               monitor classified employees who have separated from a  
               school district by dismissal, resignation, or settlement  
               during the course of an investigation for misconduct  
               involving students, similar to the oversight provided  
               for certificated employees.   Absent such a system, a  
               classified employee that left a school by dismissal,  
               resignation or settlement during the course of an  
               investigation for child abuse that did not result in an  
               arrest or criminal conviction can easily return to work  
               in another school district, a system failure that puts  
               California's children at risk.

           3)   What will the reports be used for  ?  The bill requires  
               the State Department of Education to maintain reports of  
               the classified employees reported for misconduct.   
               However, it does not specify the reasons for which  
               school districts or charter schools could obtain this  
               information.  Assuming that employing school districts  
               or charter schools wish to utilize the reports for  
               background checks for hiring purposes and determine  
               whether a prospective employee is on the list, the bill  
               does not define this process.  Staff recommends that the  
               bill be amended to ensure that the reports only be made  
               available upon request by a school district or charter  
               school solely for purposes of verifying previous  
               employment action subject to this section for a  
               classified employee who is being considered for  
               employment by the requesting school district or charter  
               school. 
                
            4)   New tracking system  .  This bill creates a new employee  
               tracking program and poses many process questions worth  
               consideration.  The bill requires the State Department  
               of Education (SDE) to establish a due process system for  
               classified employees to be removed from the list if the  
               allegations are not substantiated.  Who will investigate  
               whether allegations are substantiated?  What is the  
               process by which they are removed from the list if the  
               allegations are found to be false?  Does the SDE  
               currently have the resources and expertise to  
               successfully implement such a system?  

           5)   Is SDE the right agency  ?  While the Commission on  







                                                                  AB 349
                                                                  Page 7


               Teacher Credentialing (CTC) does not currently track  
               classified employees, it is responsible for functions  
               that are similar to those contained in this bill as they  
               relate to certificated employees.  For example, the CTC  
               is required to investigate issues of teacher misconduct  
               and has the authority to rescind a certificate holder's  
               credential.  Given its expertise in these matters, would  
               it more appropriate for CTC to administer this new  
               process, rather than the SDE? 

           6)   Mandated costs  .  The reporting requirements for school  
               districts and charter schools would likely result in  
               unknown state-reimbursable mandated costs.    

           7)   Technical amendment  :  Staff recommends that the  
               reference to section "217,1" of the Penal Code  
               referenced in subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of  
               Section 45118 (as proposed to be added) in Sec. 2 of the  
               bill be replaced with "217.1".

           8)   Related legislation  :  

               SB 160 (Lara), substantially similar to this bill,  
               requires school districts and charter schools to report  
               changes in employment status to the SDE when a  
               classified employee is dismissed, suspended, resigns,  
               retires, or is otherwise terminated as a result of  
               allegations of misconduct.  This bill is pending in the  
               Assembly Education Committee. 

           SUPPORT

           Arc and United Cerebral Palsy California Collaboration
          California Catholic Conference
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office

           OPPOSITION
           
          None on file.