BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 362| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 362 Author: Ting (D), et al. Amended: 5/21/13 in Assembly Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE : 6-1, 8/14/13 AYES: Wolk, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu NOES: Knight SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 6-1, 8/30/13 AYES: De León, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg NOES: Walters ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 56-19, 5/28/13 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Personal income taxes: exclusion: health insurance SOURCE : Equality California DIGEST : This bill, until January 1, 2019, excludes from gross income any amounts received by an employee from an employer to compensate for additional federal income taxes that are incurred by the employee on employer-provided health-care benefits because, for federal income tax purposes, the same-sex spouse or domestic partner of the employee is not considered the spouse of the employee. The exclusion from gross income also applies to any amount of the employer-provided health-care compensation paid to an employee that represents the "grossed-up" amount that an employer includes to offset additional federal income taxes incurred on such compensation. CONTINUED AB 362 Page 2 ANALYSIS : Federal and state tax laws exclude employer-provided health insurance from gross income. Federal law provides the inclusion for the employee, his/her dependents and the employee's opposite sex spouse. State law provides the benefit for a domestic partner which may include a same sex spouse. This difference in the recognition and treatment of same sex spouses lead to different tax consequences under state and federal law: Federal law provides that employer provided health insurance premiums must be included in gross income and therefore taxed at the federal level. Under state law, these premiums are not included. Federal and state law allow taxpayers to claim a personal exemption for each of the taxpayer's dependents but federal law does recognize the dependents of same sex marriages. Generally, the more dependents a taxpayer may claim, the lower that taxpayer's federal tax liability will be. Both federal and state law includes any compensation to discharge any tax liability in gross income. For example, if an employer provides an "offset" to an employee to pay the taxes on health insurance premiums of his/her same sex spouse, that amount would be included in gross income and therefore taxed. This bill, until January 1, 2019, excludes from gross income any amounts received by an employee from an employer to compensate for additional federal income taxes that are incurred by the employee on employer-provided health-care benefits because, for federal income tax purposes, the same-sex spouse or domestic partner of the employee is not considered the spouse of the employee. The exclusion from gross income also applies to any amount of the employer-provided health-care compensation paid to an employee that represents the "grossed-up" amount that an employer includes to offset additional federal income taxes incurred on such compensation. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) indicates that the bill will result in a General CONTINUED AB 362 Page 3 Fund revenue loss of $80,000 in 2013-14, $60,000 in 2014-15 and $70,000 in 2015-16. This bill will not significantly impact the department's costs. However, FTB's revenue estimate was prepared before the United States Supreme Court passed rulings related to same-sex marriages in June 2013. Those rulings would likely lower the revenue loss from this bill. SUPPORT : (Verified 8/30/13) Equality California (source) AFSCME Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club Board of Equalization Member Betty T. Yee California Association of Health Underwriters California Nurses Association Cities of Los Angeles, Sacramento, and West Hollywood Facebook Harvey Milk Democratic Club Health Access Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center Microsoft Orange County LGBTQ Center San Francisco Chamber of Commerce San Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author: Many employers provide health insurance benefits to their employees. Due to the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), however, unlike coverage for opposite-sex spouses, benefits for same-sex partners are taxed by the Federal Government as income to the employee. Employees with same-sex partners pay an average of $1,070 per year more in taxes than opposite-sex married employees with the same coverage. The number multiplies if the partner has children. Unjustly, even when a California employer compensates an employee for the federal taxes, these households end up paying state income taxes on this reimbursement. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 56-19, 5/28/13 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly, CONTINUED AB 362 Page 4 Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hernández, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina, Mitchell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NOES: Bigelow, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Linder, Logue, Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Olsen, Patterson, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk NO VOTE RECORDED: Allen, Gorell, Holden, Salas, Vacancy AB:k 8/31/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED