BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                AB 380
                                                                Page 1


        ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
        AB 380 (Dickinson)
        As Amended  May 24, 2013
        Majority vote 

         NATURAL RESOURCES   6-2         LOCAL GOVERNMENT    7-0         
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Chesbro, Garcia,          |Ayes:|Achadjian, Levine, Alejo, |
        |     |Muratsuchi, Skinner,      |     |Bradford, Gordon, Mullin, |
        |     |Stone, Williams.          |     |Frazier                   |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
        |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
        |Nays:|Bigelow, Patterson        |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |     |                          |
        |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
        |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |     |                          |
        |     |Eggman, Gomez, Hall,      |     |                          |
        |     |Ammiano, Pan, Quirk,      |     |                          |
        |     |Weber                     |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
        |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
        |Nays:|Harkey, Bigelow,          |     |                          |
        |     |Donnelly, Linder, Wagner  |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         SUMMARY  :  Establishes uniform procedures for electronic posting of  
        California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents by county  
        clerks and the Office of Planning and Research (OPR).  Specifically,  
         this bill:
         
        1)Requires specified CEQA notices to be filed with OPR, and posted  
          by OPR on a public, online database, including:

           a)   Decisions made by agencies with a certified regulatory  
             program, which are currently required to be filed with, and  
             posted by, the Natural Resources Agency.









                                                                AB 380
                                                                Page 2



           b)   Scoping meetings.

           c)   Preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) or  
             negative declaration.

           d)   Completion of an EIR.

           e)   Approval of a project.

        2)Requires notices of project approval by a state agency, currently  
          required to be filed with OPR, to also be filed with the county  
          clerk of each county in which the project will be located.

        3)Requires notices of project approval by a local agency, currently  
          required to be filed with the county clerk of each county in which  
          the project will be located, to also be filed with OPR.

        4)Requires notices of EIR completion, currently required to be filed  
          with OPR by a state or local public agency, to also be filed with  
          the county clerk of each county in which the project will be  
          located.

        5)Requires notices currently required to be posted for 30 days (or  
          20 days in the case of a notice of negative declaration) to be  
          posted for at least 30 days or the full duration of any statutory  
          time period, whichever is longer.

        6)Requires that the time limits for CEQA litigation, which commence  
          on the date of notice filing, be based on the date the notice is  
          posted online by OPR.

        7)Requires county clerks and OPR to post notices within one business  
          day and date stamp the notices.

        8)Clarifies that scoping meetings, required to be held by lead  
          agencies for certain highway projects and other projects or  
          statewide, regional, or areawide significance, are public.

         EXISTING LAW  :

        1)Requires a lead agency with the principal responsibility for  









                                                                AB 380
                                                                Page 3


          carrying out or approving a proposed project to prepare a negative  
          declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or EIR for its  
          action, unless the project is exempt from CEQA.

        2)Requires a lead agency to make these and other documents,  
          including notices, comments, and responses, available to the  
          public, including specified individuals and agencies, such as  
          residents adjacent to a proposed project, and the OPR's State  
          Clearinghouse for projects reviewed by state agencies, and provide  
          documents directly to individuals upon request.

        3)Requires a lead state agency to file a notice of determination  
          (NOD) with OPR and requires a lead local agency to file a NOD with  
          the appropriate county clerk(s).  A lead agency is authorized, but  
          not required in most cases, to file a notice of exemption (NOE) if  
          it determines that a project is exempt from CEQA.

        4)Authorizes judicial review of CEQA actions taken by public  
          agencies, following the agency's decision to carry out or approve  
          the project, subject to statutes of limitations ranging from 30 to  
          180 days:

           a)   Challenges alleging improper determination that a project  
             may have a significant effect on the environment, or alleging  
             an EIR does not comply with CEQA, must be filed within 30 days  
             of filing of the NOD.

           b)   Challenges alleging improper determination that a project is  
             exempt from CEQA must be filed within 35 days of filing of the  
             NOE, or 180 days if no notice has been filed.

           c)   Challenges alleging an agency has failed to determine  
             whether a project has a significant effect on the environment  
             must be filed within 180 days.

        5)Requires a lead agency to call at least one scoping meeting for a  
          proposed project of statewide, regional, or area-wide  
          significance.  Notice of at least one scoping meeting must be  
          provided to specified agencies, as well as any organization or  
          individual who has filed a written request for notice.

         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee,  









                                                                AB 380
                                                                Page 4


        additional cost to OPR in the less than $100,000 range.  Activities  
        are currently underway and costs would be recoverable through new  
        fee authority.
         
        COMMENTS  :  Public notice of lead agency actions and access to  
        documents is essential to CEQA's public participation purpose.   
        However, CEQA's various notice requirements have been enacted over  
        the years in a piecemeal fashion.  Many of the procedures predate  
        common use of the Internet and current expectations about electronic  
        access to information.  Local governments' use of electronic  
        document posting varies widely and there are no uniform  
        requirements.  The state has gradually incorporated the use of  
        electronic information in the CEQA process.  For example, since  
        2003, the State Clearinghouse within OPR, which coordinates the  
        state-level review of environmental documents pursuant to CEQA, has  
        distributed EIRs in CD-ROM format for state agency review and  
        comment.  The Clearinghouse now offers most other environmental  
        documents in electronic format.  The Clearinghouse also maintain  
        CEQAnet, an online searchable database of CEQA documents.  The  
        CEQAnet database provides summaries of EIRs, negative declarations,  
        and other types of CEQA documents.  The summaries include the  
        project title, project location, lead agency name, contact  
        information, and project description.  At this time, CEQAnet does  
        not provide the full text of any environmental documents.  Because  
        not all environmental documents are submitted to the State  
        Clearinghouse, CEQAnet is not a comprehensive database of all CEQA  
        documents in California.  OPR is the process of updating CEQAnet,  
        which may improve its functionality and increase the scope of CEQA  
        documents available.  This bill would establish uniform procedures  
        for lead agency CEQA documents, including requiring all lead agency  
        documents to be filed with and posted online by OPR.

        According to the author, various time periods for public, trustee,  
        and responsible agency participation under CEQA are triggered by the  
        issuance of a variety of notices required by statute.  Under current  
        law, where and how these various notices are made public (if at all)  
        substantially differs depending on the type of notice, the nature of  
        the project, and whether the lead agency is a state agency or a  
        local agency.  
         
        State agencies post their notices electronically at OPR's CEQAnet  
        Web site, while local agencies post their notices with the local  









                                                                AB 380
                                                                Page 5


        county clerk-recorder's office.  For some notices, there is no  
        requirement of public posting at all, or mandatory time frame for  
        how soon after issuance these notices must be posted, or mandate  
        that the date they are publicly posted is clearly and actually  
        recorded, yet, in most cases, the postings trigger short periods of  
        time for public or interested agency response.  Additionally, there  
        is no clarity on what procedures CEQA's posting requirements require  
        of local county clerk's offices, subjecting these provisions to  
        abuse.
         

        Analysis Prepared by  :    Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916)  
        319-2092 


                                                                  FN: 0000961