BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 410
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 10, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL
SECURITY
Rob Bonta, Chair
AB 410 (Jones-Sawyer) - As Introduced: February 15, 2013
SUBJECT : Public employee health benefits: enrollment.
SUMMARY : Permits a California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CalPERS) retired annuitant to reinstate to active
employment without losing his or her accrued retiree health
benefits earned with the previous employer, as specified.
Specifically, this bill :
1)Allows an annuitant who, after reinstatement to active
employment, subsequently retires to enroll as an annuitant of
the employer from which he or she first retired, unless the
annuitant is entitled to a higher contribution from the
employer from which he or she subsequently retires.
2)Specifies that in order to be eligible, the annuitant must
have at least five years of service with the employer from
which he or she first retired.
3)Specifies that retirement must occur within 120 days after
separation from employment from the most recent employer.
4)Specifies that any creditable service acquired after
reinstatement will not be applicable unless the individual
reinstates from retirement with the same employer from which
he or she first retired.
5)Specifies that these provisions only apply to an annuitant
who, after reinstatement, subsequently retires on or after
January 1, 2014.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown.
COMMENTS : Generally, the Public Employees' Medical and
Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) specifies that the last employer of
record before a member's retirement is the employer responsible
for paying the employer contribution for the annuitant's health
coverage, based on the length of service or vested status. It
also requires participants to perform a minimum number of years
AB 410
Page 2
of service, typically five, prior to obtaining eligibility for
annuitant health coverage or any employer contribution toward
that coverage. In addition, eligibility for enrollment in
PEMHCA requires most annuitants to retire within a specified
number of days of permanent separation from a CalPERS employer.
The amount of the employer contribution for annuitants varies
widely among employers. Alternatively, the state and some
contracting agency employers use PEMHCA vesting schedules to
determine eligibility for retiree health coverage and the
employer contribution toward participant premiums.
The enactment of the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of
2013, AB 340 (Furutani), Chapter 296, Statutes of 2012,
eliminated most exemptions to the requirement that a retired
annuitant work no more than 960 hours per year for a CalPERS
employer before automatic reinstatement to active service and
suspension of the retirement allowance and retiree health
coverage. As a result, retired annuitants whose financial
circumstances or desire to serve leads to a return to full-time
active status, results in them returning to work for a CalPERS
employer other than their prior employer, may experience a
reduction in, or outright loss of, the employer contribution
toward annuitant health coverage.
In an example provided to the Committee by CalPERS, if an
annuitant who had worked for the State earns the full employer
contribution for health coverage under the 100/90 formula after
20 years of service, later reinstates to active service with a
PEMHCA contracting agency, when the employee subsequently
retires from that contracting agency, he or she would only be
eligible to receive the employer contribution from the
contracting agency, whereas, if the person had returned to
active CalPERS-covered service with the state, he or she would
experience no reduction in retiree health benefits. This
discrepancy could result in a substantial increase in the
annuitant's out-of-pocket costs for health care in retirement.
According to the author, "Given escalating, uncapped health
benefit costs, the threat of losing employer-provided health
care coverage under PEMHCA has created a major disincentive
among retired public employees to return to work in the public
sector. Similarly, current law discourages skilled, experienced
employees who retire as a result of a job-related injury to
rehabilitate from their injury and go back to work in a less
physically demanding job."
AB 410
Page 3
Supporter state, "AB 410 incentivizes a public agency retiree to
return to work because he or she is protected against the risk
of losing his or her earned health care contribution.
Additionally, the previous employer experiences a cost-savings
as the retirement allowance and related benefits for that
retiree cease when the retiree returns to full time employment
and any obligation to pay a health care contribution is
suspended until that employee subsequently re-retires."
Supporters conclude, "AB 410 has been crafted to discourage
'double dipping' (i.e. a practice where an employee is
collecting a retirement allowance and a paycheck) by only
applying to a retiree who reinstates to active employment
causing the retirement allowance to cease."
This bill is similar to SB 695 (Wiggins) of 2008 which would
have allowed an annuitant who, after reinstatement to active
employment, subsequently retires to enroll as an annuitant of
the employer from which he or she first retired, unless the
annuitant is entitled to a higher contribution from the employer
from which he or she subsequently retires. This bill was held
in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
This bill is also similar to AB 2132 (Levine) of 2006 which
would have allowed an annuitant who, after reinstatement to
active employment, subsequently retires to enroll as an
annuitant of the employer from which he or she first retired,
unless the annuitant is entitled to a higher contribution from
the employer from which he or she subsequently retires. This
bill was vetoed by the Governor. In his veto message, Governor
Schwarzenegger stated, in part, that while the bill is intended
to eliminate disincentives for retirees to return to work and
encourage experienced public employees to return to public
service, it is premature given recent changes in the
Governmental Accounting Standard Board rules that require both
state and local governments to undertake an actuarial assessment
of their unfunded retiree health benefits and that until that
information is available, this bill is premature.
Finally, this bill is also similar to AB 1611 (Levine) of 2003
which would have allowed an annuitant who, after reinstatement
to active employment, subsequently retires to enroll in PEMHCA
as an annuitant of the employer from which he or she first
retired, unless the annuitant is entitled to a greater
AB 410
Page 4
contribution from the employer from which he or she subsequently
retires. This bill was held in the Assembly Appropriations
Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
California Professional Firefighters (Sponsor)
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by : Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)
319-3957