BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 410 (Jones-Sawyer) - Public Employee Health Benefits
          
          Amended: June 4, 2013           Policy Vote: PE&R 4-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: June 24, 2013                             
          Consultant: Maureen Ortiz       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 410 will allow a CalPERS annuitant, who  
          reinstates to active employment and subsequently retires again,  
          to continue receiving retiree health benefits from the employer  
          from which he or she first retired.

          Fiscal Impact: 

              Unknown costs and savings to state and local employers  
              (General/Local Funds)

          The fiscal impact will vary and will be dependent on the number  
          of employees who retire, reinstate with a different employer and  
          subsequently retire again, and on the individuals' vesting of  
          health benefits.

           Costs  :  There could be a loss of savings to the state to the  
          extent that employees who would already otherwise retire, return  
          to work with a different employer, and re-retire drawing health  
          benefits from the last employer will now be able to receive  
          health benefits from their first employer under the provisions  
          of this bill.

           Savings  :  There could be substantial savings to the extent that  
          this bill encourages more retirees to reinstate with a different  
          employer since during that period of time while the employee has  
          reinstated to active employment, the state will not pay the  
          health benefits that are currently being paid to the annuitant. 

          These costs/savings could be incurred by the state or by other  
          local agencies dependent on where the individual had been first  
          employed.  









          AB 410 (Jones-Sawyer)
          Page 1



          Background:  Under current law, a member's last employer is  
          responsible for paying the employer contribution for the  
          annuitant's health coverage.  The Public Employees' Medical and  
          Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) employer vesting schedules require a  
          minimum number of years of service prior to obtaining  
          eligibility for annuitant health coverage.  The amount of the  
          employer contribution for annuitants varies among employers.  A  
          member may retire, and then return to employment as a retired  
          annuitant with a CalPERS employer, but the employment time may  
          not exceed 960 hours per year.  If the retiree does work more  
          than 960 hours per year, then his or her retirement allowance  
          and benefits cease, and the member must be reinstated from  
          retirement as an active employee and member of the system.   
          Therefore, if a retired member reinstates to active employment,  
          the new employer is considered the last employer of record for  
          purposes of determining health coverage eligibility when that  
          member retires a second time.   

          For example, if a state annuitant receives the full employer  
          contribution for health coverage after 20 years of service with  
          the state and later decides to reinstate to active employment  
          with a local contracting agency, when the employee subsequently  
          retires from that agency he or she is only eligible to receive  
          the employer contribution from the contracting agency (i.e. the  
          last employer).  This can result in a substantial increase in an  
          annuitant's out-of-pocket costs for health care.   For instance,  
          if an individual, who is a former state employee receiving  
          health coverage under PEMHCA with the state contribution paid  
          according to the 100/90 formula, decides to reinstate as an  
          active employee for a contracting agency that only pays a $64.60  
          employer contribution for retiree health coverage, then the  
          individual would receive only $64.60 per month after his or her  
          subsequent retirement, rather than the state's100/90 formula  
          contribution that was paid prior to reinstatement.  This would  
          result in a substantial increase in annuitant out-of-pocket  
          costs for health care in retirement.

          Proposed Law:  AB 410 will allow an annuitant who reinstates and  
          retires a second time to receive health benefits from his or her  
          first employer if it will result in the annuitant receiving a  
          higher contribution for health care.  To be eligible, the second  
          retirement must occur within 120 days after separation from  
          employment from the second employer.   








          AB 410 (Jones-Sawyer)
          Page 2




          Related Legislation:  This bill is similar to SB 695 (Wiggins)  
          which was held on this committee's suspense file in 2008.

          Staff Comments:  AB 410 will remove the disincentive for retired  
          state employees to return to work more than half-time with a  
          CalPERS employer that offers less lucrative retiree health  
          benefits.