BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 425 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 16, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS Luis Alejo, Chair AB 425 (Atkins) - As Amended: April 9, 2013 SUBJECT : Pesticide: antifouling paint: pesticide registration: evaluation. SUMMARY : Requires, no later than February 1, 2014, the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) to determine a leach rate for copper-based antifouling paint used on recreational vessels and make recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures to address the protection of aquatic environments from the effects of exposure to that paint. EXISTING LAW : Under federal law: 1)Requires, under the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d), states to identify waters that do not meet, or are not expected to meet by the next listing cycle, applicable water quality standards after the application of certain technology-based controls and to schedule such waters for the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards. 2)Provides, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), for federal regulation of pesticide distribution, sale, and use. Requires all pesticides distributed or sold in the United States to be registered (licensed) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Requires the approval of antifouling paints by the US EPA before application or sale within the United States. Under state law: 1)Imposes, under the Marine Invasive Species Act, requirements on the master, owner, operator, or person in charge of a vessel, as defined, to minimize the uptake and release of nonindigenous species, including the removal of hull fouling organisms and cleaning of the ballast tanks regularly to AB 425 Page 2 remove fouling organisms. 2)Requires DPR to regulate pesticides, including the use of antifouling coatings, in California. 3)Establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) to preserve, enhance and restore the quality of California's water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. Requires the SWRCB and the RWQCBs to implement the federal CWA in California. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown. COMMENTS : Need for the bill: According to the author's office, "AB 425 follows previous work by the Legislature, SB 623 (Kehoe), introduced in 2011 but suspended in 2012 pending the results of state and federal studies that would help address the growing problem of toxic copper pollution in our state's waterways. Dissolved copper concentrations in multiple water bodies exceed the copper criterion established in the California Toxics Rule (CTR) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Water bodies that exceed the CTR copper criterion are placed on EPA's 303d list and a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is developed for these water bodies. Copper pollution from copper antifouling paints is a statewide problem; therefore, statewide legislation is appropriate rather than having individual Regional Water Quality Control Boards establish their own regulations." Biofouling : The US EPA reports that boat hulls are especially prone to damage from saltwater and marine organisms because they are continuously under the water. Marine organisms such as barnacles, algae, and sponges (commonly referred to as "fouling") exist by attaching to stationary objects underwater. Excessive fouling on boat hulls leads to loss of speed and maneuverability, increases fuel consumption and strains on engines. Controlling biofouling : Most boat owners choose an antifouling hull paint to limit the amount of fouling that grows on their boat hulls. Antifouling coatings work by either delivering a AB 425 Page 3 controlled, steady release of biocide from the paint surface into the surrounding water next to the hull or by ablation. The more biocide that is released, either through passive leaching or ablation, the more effective the paint is at inhibiting fouling. It is this layer of biocide that stops the fouling from settling. Most antifouling coatings are made with copper, which keeps boat hulls clean because the metal is undesirable to fouling organisms. Environmental impacts of copper : Copper loading in the marine environment comes from two major antifouling coating sources: 1) the passive leaching of copper from the coatings; and 2) hull cleaning of the vessels by divers using abrasive tools. In recent years, copper used as an antifoulant has been found to have negative environmental impacts. Copper is highly toxic in aquatic environments and has effects in fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, with all three groups equally sensitive to chronic toxicity. Copper will bioconcentrate in many different organs in fish and mollusks. Regulation of copper in the marine environment : Pollutant concentrations in surface waters and pollutant discharges are regulated by the state water agencies and by the US EPA under the CWA. In 2000, US EPA found that California's water quality standards did not meet the requirements of the CWA, and subsequently promulgated federal numeric water quality criteria for priority toxic pollutants for inland surface waters and enclosed bays and estuaries in California. This regulation is known as the California Toxics Rule (CTR). These water quality criteria became the approved water quality criteria for toxic pollutants for all purposes and programs under the CWA (40 CFR 131.38). Copper routinely exceeds the CTR criteria and there is a growing concern over the water quality impacts of copper. Since antifouling boat paints are considered to be biocides, they are regulated by pesticide agencies. In California, DPR regulates the use of antifouling coatings. Copper in California water bodies : According to the SWRCB, there are currently 84 water bodies throughout the state listed on the CWA 303(d) list as "impaired" water bodies due to copper concentrations. Thirteen of those water bodies have established TMDLs addressing copper concentrations, primarily in the Los Angeles area. AB 425 Page 4 In 2010, DPR issued a decision to reevaluate all registered copper hull paint products because its 2009 statewide study, "Monitoring for Indicators of Antifouling Paint Pollution in California Marinas," indicated that copper antifouling paints can be a significant source of copper in marina waters; copper concentrations in many salt and brackish water marinas exceeded the CTR chronic water quality standard for copper; the use of copper antifouling paints contributes to this exceedance; and copper antifouling paint pollution is a multi-regional issue in California. This reevaluation is ongoing and there is no targeted finalization date. According to the author, the intent of this bill is to, "Provide the impetus to complete the scientific analyses needed to formulate sound environmental policy that protects our water quality and marine life in a way that is least burdensome to recreational boat owners." Alternatives to copper antifouling paint : According to US EPA, to find and promote the use of safer alternatives to copper antifouling coatings on marine vessels, US EPA awarded the San Diego Unified Port District with $190,000 in grant funding to test a variety of new non-copper hull paints in San Diego. The project occurred from January 2008 through December 2010. Some of the newly tested paints were, like copper, biocides such as zinc and organic biocide paints. Alternative biocides have unknown environmental and health effects, but it is likely that the buildup of zinc would also cause negative impacts to the aquatic environment. Non-biocide coatings were also tested. These were found to cause no harm to marine life or their aquatic environment, nor did they put human health at risk. In addition to their environmentally-friendly qualities, the preferred non-biocide paints demonstrated cost-effectiveness due to their longevity (15+ years) and cleaning frequency similar to copper-based paints. Non-biocide coatings show particular promise due their ability to provide anti-fouling protection while ensuring the well-being of aquatic life and human health. Recent related legislation : SB 623 (Kehoe, 2011). Would have restricted the use of copper antifouling paint on recreational vessels. This bill passed out of the Assembly ETSM Committee on a 5 - 1 vote, but was later amended to reflect policy related to aspiration abortions. AB 425 Page 5 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support: San Diego Unified Port District (sponsor) American Coatings Association California Paint Council Sierra Club California Opposition: None received. Analysis Prepared by : Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 319-3965