BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 455
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 1, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 455 (Medina) - As Amended:  April 9, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Education  
          Vote:7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction  
          (SPI) to consult with a group of experts on blind and visually  
          impaired persons to develop standards, aligned to the Common  
          Core (CC) Standards, regarding braille literacy and mathematics  
          code for pupils in K-12 grades.  Further requires the SPI to  
          consult with a group of experts on the deaf and hard-of-hearing  
          to develop literacy standards in American Sign Language (ASL)  
          that are aligned to the CC Standards for pupils in grades K-12.   
          Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Amends existing law that established a braille literacy  
            advisory task force to require at least-one half of the  
            members be currently employed public school teachers.  

          2)Requires the SPI to make a recommendation to the State Board  
            of Education (SBE) regarding the development of braille  
            reading and mathematics standards aligned to the CC Standards  
            by March 30, 2015, and requires the SBE to adopt these  
            standards by June 30, 2015.

          3)Requires the SBE, if it revises the braille reading or  
            mathematics standards recommended by the SPI, to provide  
            written reasons at a public meeting and adopt the revised  
            standards at a subsequent meeting, but no later than August  
            31, 2015.    

          4)Requires the group of experts the SPI consults with to develop  
            ASL literacy standards comprise at least one-half public  
            school teachers.  Further requires the SPI to make a  
            recommendation on the development of these standards by March  








                                                                  AB 455
                                                                  Page  2

            30, 2015.   

          5)Requires the SBE, by June 30, 2015, to adopt the ASL literacy  
            standards aligned to the CC Standards.  Further requires the  
            SBE, if it revises the standards recommended by the SPI, to  
            provide written reasons at a public meeting and adopt the  
            revised standards at a subsequent meeting, but no later than  
            August 31, 2015.    

          6)Requires county offices of education (COEs), school districts,  
            and special education local plan areas (SELPAs) to provide  
            deaf and hard-of-hearing pupils opportunities for instruction  
            to master the ASL literacy standards aligned to the CC  
            Standards adopted by the SBE.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time GF administrative costs, likely between $150,000 and  
            $250,000, to reestablish the braille standards task force and  
            establish a task force to develop ASL standards, as specified.  
             

          1)Potential, unknown GF/98 costs, likely less than $100,000, to  
            COEs, school districts, and SELPAs to provide deaf and hard of  
            hearing pupils opportunities for instruction to master ASL  
            literacy standards aligned to the CC Standards, as specified.   
            Presumably, these costs would not be reimbursable if in the  
            pupil's individualized education plan delineated the use of  
            these literacy standards in their instructional program.   
            There were 13,937 pupils identified as deaf or hard of hearing  
            in 2011-12.        

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  .  As a condition of applying for the federal Race  
            to the Top (RTT) grant program, states were required to adopt  
            the CC Standards in English language arts (ELA) and  
            mathematics by the fall of 2010.  As part of California's RTT  
            application, SB 1 X5 (Steinberg), Chapter 2, Fifth  
            Extraordinary Session, Statutes of 2010, was enacted to  
            establish the Academic Content Standards Commission (ACSC),  
            consisting of 21 members appointed by the governor (11), the  
            Senate Committee on Rules (5), and the Speaker of the Assembly  
            (5), to develop academic content standards in language arts  
            and mathematics. In August 2010, the ACSC made its  








                                                                  AB 455
                                                                  Page  3

            recommendations to the SBE and the SBE adopted these  
            standards. 

           2)Purpose  .  Since the state's adoption of the CC Standards in  
            ELA and mathematics, it has taken necessary conforming steps  
            to align other standards/curriculum with these standards.  For  
            example, legislation has passed to align the CC Standards in  
            ELA with English language development standards for English  
            learner pupils and to require the SPI to develop curriculum  
            frameworks aligned to both sets of CC Standards.  

            According to SDE, there are 686,352 pupils with special needs  
            enrolled in California schools in 2011-12.  Of this number,  
            13,937 (2%) are identified as deaf or hard of hearing and  
            4,327 (.01%) are identified as having a visual impairment.  In  
            order to ensure these students have the same access to the  
            state's high quality CC Standards, the current standards for  
            braille literacy and mathematics should be updated.  The state  
            does not currently have standards for ASL and therefore, these  
            standards need to be developed and aligned to the CC Standards  
            in ELA as well.  

            The SPI, the sponsor of this measure, indicates Maryland has  
            adopted model braille standards aligned to the CC Standards  
            for the blind and visually impaired.  According to the SPI,  
            "These standards, if adopted by California, will provide  
            guidance for educators as they apply to students who are blind  
            and visually impaired." The SPI further notes the California  
            Schools for the Deaf, Fremont and Riverside have been  
            collaboratively developing standards aligned to the CC  
            Standards in ELA, literacy in history-social science, science,  
            and technical subjects for students who are deaf and  
            hard-of-hearing and use ASL as their primary language.  The  
            SPI anticipates both groups of experts reviewing the Maryland  
            and California Schools for the Deaf's work, as appropriate, in  
            meeting the requirements of this bill.    

           3)Technical amendment  .  The bill requires the SBE, should it  
            recommend revisions to both the braille and ASL standards, to  
            make these revisions at a public meeting.  Generally, the  
            language related to public meetings includes the term  
            regularly scheduled.  This language is necessary to ensure a  
            special SBE meeting won't be called solely to consider  
            standard revisions, which will reduce mandated costs  
            associated with the Open Meetings Act.  The committee  








                                                                  AB 455
                                                                  Page  4

            recommends the author amend the bill to include this language.  
               
           
          4)Existing law  , via AB 2326 (Frommer), Chapter 653, Statutes of  
            2002, required the SPI to form an advisory task force to  
            develop standards for the mastery of the braille literacy code  
            for pupils in grades K-12.  The task force was required to  
            report by June 30, 2004.    

            AB 897 (Coto), Chapter 530, Statues of 2005, required the SPI  
            to utilize the task force established by Chapter 653 to  
            develop standards for the mastery of the braille mathematics  
            code for pupils in grades K-12.  The task force was required  
            to report by March 1, 2006.  This measure also required the  
            SBE, by June 1, 2006, to adopt standards for both the braille  
            literacy and mathematic codes.  Chapter 530 also required  
            COEs, school districts, and SELPAs to provide opportunities  
            for instruction to master the braille reading and mathematics  
            standards, as specified.  

            In 2006, the SBE adopted the braille standards in reading and  
            mathematics.  These standards are available on SDE's website  
            for teachers, parents, and members of the public to access.   
            After the task force completed its work, it dissolved.  This  
            bill proposes to reestablish and reconfigure this task force  
            to establish new braille standards in reading and mathematics  
            that are aligned to the CC Standards, as specified.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081