BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 474|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                       CONSENT


          Bill No:  AB 474
          Author:   Stone (D)
          Amended:  1/6/14 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 6/10/14
          AYES:  Pavley, Cannella, Evans, Fuller, Hueso, Jackson, Lara,  
            Monning, Wolk

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 6/17/14 
          AYES:  Jackson, Corbett, Lara, Leno, Monning, Vidak
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Anderson

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 1/29/14 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    California Coastal Commission:  ex parte  
          communications:  
                      disclosure forms

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill adds to the existing ex parte  
          communications disclosure provisions requirements that the  
          disclosure also include the identity of the person on whose  
          behalf the communication was made, the identity of all persons  
          present during the communication, and a complete, comprehensive  
          description of the content of the ex parte communication,  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 474
                                                                     Page  
          2

          including a complete set of all text and graphic material that  
          was part of the communication. 

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

          1.Establishes the California Coastal Commission (Commission) and  
            charges it with the implementation of the substantive  
            provisions of California Coastal Act (Act) as well as numerous  
            procedural provisions of that Act.  One of those provisions  
            prohibits ex parte communications between a member of the  
            Commission and persons with an interest in a matter pending  
            before the Commission unless the member of the Commission  
            provides a public report of the communication as specified in  
            the Act. 

          2.Defines "ex parte communication" as any oral or written  
            communication between a member of the Commission and an  
            interested person about a matter within the Commission's  
            jurisdiction, which does not occur in a public hearing,  
            workshop, or other official proceeding or that is not on the  
            record at such a proceeding. 

          3.Defines "interested person" as any applicant, an agent or  
            employee of the applicant, or a person receiving consideration  
            for representing the applicant; a participant in a proceeding  
            on any matter before the Commission; or, any person with a  
            financial interest in a matter before the Commission. 

          4.Requires the Commission to adopt standard disclosure forms for  
            ex parte communications that include: 

             A.   The date, time, and location of the communication; 

             B.   The identity of the person or persons initiating and  
               receiving the communication; and, 

             C.   A complete description of the content of the  
               communication, including the text of any written materials.  


          This bill adds to the existing ex parte communications  
          disclosure provisions requirements that the disclosure also  
          include: 


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 474
                                                                     Page  
          3

          1.The identity of the person on whose behalf the communication  
            was made. 

          2.The identity of all persons present during the communication. 

          3.A complete, comprehensive description of the content of the ex  
            parte communication, including a complete set of all text and  
            graphic material that was part of the communication. 

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/30/14)

          CALPIRG
          Surfrider 
          North County Watch

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The Surfrider Foundation, in support,  
          observes that this bill would provide greater transparency for  
          ex parte communications with members of the Commission and that:  
          "Current law does not require disclosure of information about  
          all communication participants.  This simple fix to the law will  
          place into statute a requirement that information about all  
          participants in ex parte communications be disclosed.  The  
          Commission manages [some] of the most expensive real estate on  
          the [planet] and therefore it is critical the ex parte  
          communications are open and transparent to ensure protection of  
          coastal resources, as required by the ? Act."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 1/29/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández,  
            Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Morrell, Mullin,  
            Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, V.  
            Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 474
                                                                     Page  
          4

          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Logue, Perea


          RM:nl  6/30/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****





































                                                                CONTINUED