BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 483| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 483 Author: Ting (D) Amended: 8/13/13 in Senate Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE : 7-0, 8/21/13 AYES: Wolk, Knight, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not relevant SUBJECT : Local government: taxes, fees, assessments, and charges: definitions SOURCE : California Travel Association DIGEST : This bill defines "specific benefit" and "specific government service" for the purpose of determining whether a levy is a tax pursuant to Article XIIIC of the California Constitution. ANALYSIS : Existing law allows local officials to charge benefit assessments to property owners to pay for public works and public services. Proposition 218 (1996) requires owners of real property to approve benefit assessments in a weighted ballot election. Property owners vote in proportion to their proposed assessments, which reflect how much their property benefits from the proposed public works or public services. State law also allows local officials to create an assessment CONTINUED AB 483 Page 2 district, often called a business improvement district (BID), to levy assessments on business owners to pay for specified types of physical improvements or activities that benefit businesses within the district. One type of business assessment-based district is a tourism marketing district (TMD). TMDs are typically formed to assess hotels and other lodging businesses to pay for marketing and other activities that promote tourism within the district and increase visitors' use of the hotels and lodging facilities. The courts have said that assessments on businesses, as opposed to real property, are not subject to Proposition 218's provisions. This bill: 1. Defines the terms "specific benefit" and "specific government service" for the purposes of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. 2. Defines "specific benefit" as a benefit provided directly to a payor and not provided to those not charged. This bill specifies that ancillary or other benefits to nonpayors may be created in the course of providing the specific benefit to payors. A benefit is not excluded from classification as a "specific benefit" by reason of a complete or partial exemption from the levy, charge, or exaction imposed for that benefit, provided that a levy, charge, or exaction imposed for that benefit is used to provide that benefit only to the payor. 3. Defines "specific government service" as a service that is provided by an agency directly to the payor and is not provided to those not charged. A "specific government service" can include safety, maintenance, landscaping, marketing, events, capital improvements, and promotions. A service is not excluded from classification as a "specific government service" by reason of a complete or partial exemption from the levy, charge, or exaction imposed for that service, provided that a levy, charge, or exaction imposed for that service is used to provide that service only to the payor. Background CONTINUED AB 483 Page 3 In November 2010, voters approved Proposition 26, which amended the California Constitution to expand the definitions of local taxes and tax increases that require voter approval. Proposition 26 defined any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government as a tax, requiring voter approval, except for: A charge for a specific benefit or privilege conveyed directly to the payor and not conveyed to those not charged. A charge for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor and not provided to those not charged. A fee to cover certain costs of regulation. Entrance fees for state or local property. Fines imposed by a court or a local government. A charge imposed as a condition of property development. Assessments and property related fees governed by Proposition 218. Because Proposition 26's exception for assessments applies only to assessments governed by Proposition 218, the exception does not apply to assessments on businesses. Improvements and activities financed by TMDs and BIDs may be exempt from Proposition 26's definition of a tax if they can be characterized as charges for specific benefits or specific government services provided directly to payors and not provided to those not charged. However, Proposition 26 does not define the terms "specific benefit" and "specific government service." It is unclear whether assessments on businesses for improvements or activities that produce benefits beyond those provided directly to businesses qualify for any of Proposition 26's exceptions. Recent lawsuits challenging assessments levied by the City of San Diego's TMD cited Proposition 26. While one of CONTINUED AB 483 Page 4 those suits has been dismissed and two remain unresolved, they underscore the uncertainty about Proposition 26's applicability to business assessments. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 8/26/13) California Travel Association (source) Anaheim Orange County Visitor & Convention Bureau Azul Hospitality Group California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce California Association of Boutique & Breakfast Inns California Association of RV Parks & Campgrounds California Attractions & Parks Association California Business Properties Association California Downtown Association California Hotel and Lodging Association California Lodging Industry Association California Restaurant Association California Retailers Association California State Association of Counties Certified Folder Display Service, Inc. Chateau Montelena Winery City of Pismo Beach Conference & Visitors Bureau El Dorado County Visitors Authority Fresno Clovis Convention & Visitors Bureau Gaynes Consulting Golden Gate Restaurant Association Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau Hotel Council of San Francisco Humboldt County Convention & Visitors Bureau LEGOLAND California Resort Los Angeles Tourism & Convention Board Novato Chamber of Commerce Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce Ojai Visitors Bureau Orange County Visitors Association Palm Spring Bureau of Tourism Pasadena Convention & Visitors Bureau Pure Luxury Transportation Quality Inn Temecula Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism CONTINUED AB 483 Page 5 San Francisco Chamber of Commerce San Francisco Travel Association San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Santa Barbara Conference & Visitors Bureau and Film Commission Santa Cruz County Conference & Visitors Council Santa Monica Convention & Visitors Bureau Santa Rosa Convention & Visitors Bureau Santa Ynez Valley Hotel Association Sea World San Diego Sonoma County Tourism Stockton Convention and Visitors Bureau Sunset Publishing Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Vallejo Convention & Visitors Bureau Visit Mendocino Valley Visit Napa Valley Visit Newport Beach Visit Oceanside Visit Tri-Valley Visit West Hollywood Yosemite Sierra Visitors Bureau OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/26/13) California Taxpayers Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author, "AB 483 would support California's important tourism industry by ensuring that local governments may continue to establish and renew Tourism Marketing Districts (TMDs) and other Business Improvement Districts (BIDs). TMDs and BIDs are effective non-profit entities electively formed by businesses in partnership with local governments, whereby businesses impose an assessment on themselves to privately fund tourism promotion efforts. This bill clarifies definitions that govern these districts, allowing them to operate more efficiently and bolster economic development and job growth throughout the state." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : CalTax is opposed to this bill and writes, "AB 483 (Ting), which proposes to redefine terms in Proposition 26, a successful 2010 ballot measure sponsored by CalTax to protect taxpayers from hidden taxes. By redefining terms used in Proposition 26, this bill undermines the will of the voters and changes the intent of this measure." CONTINUED AB 483 Page 6 AB:d 8/26/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED