BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 483|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 483
Author: Ting (D), et al.
Amended: 9/4/13 in Senate
Vote: 27 - Urgency
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE : 7-0, 8/21/13
AYES: Wolk, Knight, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not relevant
SUBJECT : Local government: taxes, fees, assessments, and
charges:
definitions
SOURCE : California Travel Association
DIGEST : This bill defines specific benefit and specific
government service for the purpose of determining whether a levy
is a tax pursuant to Article XIIIC of the California
Constitution.
Senate Floor Amendments of 9/4/13 modify the bills definitions
of "specific benefit" and "specific government service" to
eliminate a reference to ancillary benefits and add language
recognizing that a "specific benefit" or "specific government
service" may generate indirect, secondary benefits for
nonpayers.
ANALYSIS : Existing law allows local officials to charge
benefit assessments to property owners to pay for public works
CONTINUED
AB 483
Page
2
and public services. Proposition 218 (1996) requires owners of
real property to approve benefit assessments in a weighted
ballot election. Property owners vote in proportion to their
proposed assessments, which reflect how much their property
benefits from the proposed public works or public services.
State law also allows local officials to create an assessment
district, often called a business improvement district (BID), to
levy assessments on business owners to pay for specified types
of physical improvements or activities that benefit businesses
within the district. One type of business assessment-based
district is a tourism marketing district (TMD). TMDs are
typically formed to assess hotels and other lodging businesses
to pay for marketing and other activities that promote tourism
within the district and increase visitors' use of the hotels and
lodging facilities. The courts have said that assessments on
businesses, as opposed to real property, are not subject to
Proposition 218's provisions.
Existing law defines any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind
imposed by a local government as a tax, requiring voter
approval. Exceptions to this general definition of a local tax
include (1) a charge for a specific benefit or privilege
conveyed directly to the payor and not conveyed to those not
charged; and (2) a charge for a specific government service or
product provided directly to the payor and not provided to those
not charged.
This bill:
1. Defines the terms "specific benefit" and "specific government
service" for the purposes of Article XIIIC of the California
Constitution.
2. Defines "specific benefit" as a benefit provided directly to
a payor and not provided to those not charged. Provides that
a specific benefit is not excluded from classification as a
specific benefit merely because an indirect benefit to a
nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as
a consequence of providing the specific benefit to the payor.
3. Defines "specific government service" as a service that is
provided by a local government directly to the payor and is
not provided to those not charged. Provides that a specific
CONTINUED
AB 483
Page
3
government service is not excluded from classification as a
specific government service merely because an indirect
benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to
the payor as a consequence of providing the specific
government service to the payor. A "specific government
service" can include maintenance, landscaping, marketing,
events, and promotions.
4. Declares that a local government must bear the burden of
proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy,
charge, or exaction imposed for a specific benefit or
specific government service is not a tax, that the amount
does not exceed the reasonable costs of providing the benefit
or service, and that costs are allocated in a manner that
bears a fair or reasonable relationship to the specific
benefits or specific government services received by a payor.
5. Adds legislative findings and declarations regarding the
bill's purpose.
Background
In November 2010, voters approved Proposition 26, which amended
the California Constitution to expand the definitions of local
taxes and tax increases that require voter approval.
Proposition 26 defined any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind
imposed by a local government as a tax, requiring voter
approval, except for:
A charge for a specific benefit or privilege conveyed directly
to the payor and not conveyed to those not charged.
A charge for a specific government service or product provided
directly to the payor and not provided to those not charged.
A fee to cover certain costs of regulation.
Entrance fees for state or local property.
CONTINUED
AB 483
Page
4
Fines imposed by a court or a local government.
A charge imposed as a condition of property development.
Assessments and property related fees governed by Proposition
218.
Because Proposition 26's exception for assessments applies only
to assessments governed by Proposition 218, the exception does
not apply to assessments on businesses. Improvements and
activities financed by TMDs and BIDs may be exempt from
Proposition 26's definition of a tax if they can be
characterized as charges for specific benefits or specific
government services provided directly to payors and not provided
to those not charged. However, Proposition 26 does not define
the terms "specific benefit" and "specific government service."
It is unclear whether assessments on businesses for improvements
or activities that produce benefits beyond those provided
directly to businesses qualify for any of Proposition 26's
exceptions. Recent lawsuits challenging assessments levied by
the City of San Diego's TMD cited Proposition 26. While one of
those suits has been dismissed and two remain unresolved, they
underscore the uncertainty about Proposition 26's applicability
to business assessments.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local:
No
SUPPORT : (Verified 9/5/13)
California Travel Association (source)
Anaheim Orange County Visitor & Convention Bureau
Azul Hospitality Group
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
California Association of Boutique & Breakfast Inns
California Association of RV Parks & Campgrounds
California Attractions & Parks Association
California Business Properties Association
California Downtown Association
California Hotel and Lodging Association
California Lodging Industry Association
California Restaurant Association
CONTINUED
AB 483
Page
5
California Retailers Association
California State Association of Counties
Certified Folder Display Service, Inc.
Chateau Montelena Winery
City of Pismo Beach Conference & Visitors Bureau
Downtown Sacramento Partnership
El Dorado County Visitors Authority
Fresno Clovis Convention & Visitors Bureau
Gaynes Consulting
Golden Gate Restaurant Association
Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau
Hotel Council of San Francisco
Humboldt County Convention & Visitors Bureau
LEGOLAND California Resort
Los Angeles Tourism & Convention Board
Novato Chamber of Commerce
Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce
Ojai Visitors Bureau
Orange County Visitors Association
Palm Spring Bureau of Tourism
Pasadena Convention & Visitors Bureau
Pure Luxury Transportation
Quality Inn Temecula
Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
San Francisco Travel Association
San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau
Santa Barbara Conference & Visitors Bureau and Film Commission
Santa Cruz County Conference & Visitors Council
Santa Monica Convention & Visitors Bureau
Santa Rosa Convention & Visitors Bureau
Santa Ynez Valley Hotel Association
Sea World San Diego
Sonoma County Tourism
Stockton Convention and Visitors Bureau
Sunset Publishing
Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau
Vallejo Convention & Visitors Bureau
Visit Mendocino Valley
Visit Napa Valley
Visit Newport Beach
Visit Oceanside
Visit Tri-Valley
Visit West Hollywood
CONTINUED
AB 483
Page
6
Yosemite Sierra Visitors Bureau
OPPOSITION : (Verified 9/5/13)
California Taxpayers Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author, "AB 483 would
support California's important tourism industry by ensuring that
local governments may continue to establish and renew Tourism
Marketing Districts (TMDs) and other Business Improvement
Districts (BIDs). TMDs and BIDs are effective non-profit
entities electively formed by businesses in partnership with
local governments, whereby businesses impose an assessment on
themselves to privately fund tourism promotion efforts. This
bill clarifies definitions that govern these districts, allowing
them to operate more efficiently and bolster economic
development and job growth throughout the state."
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : CalTax is opposed to this bill and
writes, "AB 483 (Ting), which proposes to redefine terms in
Proposition 26, a successful 2010 ballot measure sponsored by
CalTax to protect taxpayers from hidden taxes.
By redefining terms used in Proposition 26, this bill undermines
the will of the voters and changes the intent of this measure."
AB:d 9/5/13 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED