AB 537, as amended, Bonta. Meyers-Milias-Brown Act: impasse procedures.
The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act requires the governing body of a local public agency to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organization. The act requires that, in order to meet and confer in good faith, a public agency meet personally and confer promptly, and continue for a reasonable period of time, with the employee organization in order to exchange freely prior to the agency adopting a budget for the next fiscal year.
end deleteThis bill would prohibit a public agency from conditioning the meeting and conferring on a limitation on the right of employees or an employee organization to communicate with officials of the agency.
end deleteThebegin insert Meyers-Milias-Brown Act requires the governing body of a local public agency to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organization. Theend insert act requires, if an agreement is reached, that the parties prepare jointly a nonbinding written memorandum of understanding of the agreement that would then be presented to the governing body or its statutory representative for determination.
This bill would requirebegin delete thatend deletebegin insert that, ifend insert a tentative agreementbegin insert isend insert
reached by thebegin delete parties be presented toend deletebegin insert parties,end insert the governing bodybegin delete for determination and, if not rejectedend deletebegin insert
vote to accept or reject that agreementend insert within 30begin delete days, be deemed adopted. Thisend deletebegin insert days of the date it is first considered, as specified. Theend insert bill would not bar the filing of a charge for failure to meet and confer in good faith if the governing body rejects the tentative agreement. The bill would further require the parties to jointly prepare a written memorandum of understanding upon adoption of the tentative agreement by the governing body.
Under existing law, a written agreement to submit to arbitration a specified controversy is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable, except if grounds exist for the revocation of the written agreement.
This bill would additionally provide that an arbitration agreement contained in a memorandum of understanding entered into under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act is enforceable, as specified.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 3505 of the Government Code is amended
2to read:
(a) The governing body of a public agency, or the
4boards, commissions, administrative officers, or other
5representatives as properly designated by law or by a governing
6body, shall meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours,
7and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives
8of those recognized employee organizations, as defined in
9subdivision (b) of Section 3501, and shall consider fully the
P3 1presentations as are made by the employee organization on behalf
2of its members prior to arriving at a determination of policy or
3course of action.
4(b) “Meet and confer in good faith” means that a public agency,
5or such representatives
as it may designate, and representatives of
6recognized employee organizations, shall have the mutual
7obligation personally to meet and confer promptly upon request
8by either party and continue for a reasonable period of time in
9order to exchange freely information, opinions, and proposals, and
10to endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of
11representation prior to the adoption by the public agency of its
12final budget for the ensuing year. A public agency shall not propose
13as a condition of meeting and conferring a limitation on the right
14of an employee organization or employees of the agency to
15communicate with officials of the agency. The process should
16include adequate time for the resolution of impasses where specific
17procedures for the resolution are contained in local rule, regulation,
18or ordinance, or when these procedures are utilized by mutual
19
consent.
Section 3505.1 of the Government Code is
22amended to read:
If a tentative agreement is reached by the authorized
24representatives of the public agency and a recognized employee
25organization or recognized employee organizations,begin delete that tentative the governing body
26agreement shall be presented toend deletebegin delete for begin insert shall vote to accept
27determination. If the governing body does notend delete
28orend insert reject the tentative agreement within 30 daysbegin delete from its begin insert
of the date it is first
29presentation, it shall be deemed adoptedend delete
30considered at a duly noticed public meetingend insert. A decision by the
31governing body to reject the tentative agreement shall not bar the
32filing of a charge of unfair practice for failure to meet and confer
33in good faith. If the governing body adopts the tentative agreement,
34the parties shall jointly prepare a written memorandum of
35understanding.
Section 3505.8 is added to the Government Code, to
38read:
An arbitration agreement contained in a memorandum
40of understanding entered into under this chapter shall be
P4 1enforceable in an action brought pursuant to Title 9 (commencing
2with Section 1280) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An
3assertion that the arbitration claim is untimely orbegin delete thatend deletebegin insert otherwise
4barred becauseend insert the party seeking arbitration has failed to satisfy
5the procedural prerequisites to arbitration shall not be a basis for
6refusing to submit the dispute to arbitration. All procedural
7defenses shall be presented to the arbitrator for resolution. A court
8shall not refuse to order arbitration because a party to the
9memorandum of
understanding contends that the conduct in
10question arguably constitutes an unfair practice subject to the
11jurisdiction of the board.begin insert end insertbegin insertIf a party to a memorandum of
12understanding files an unfair practice charge based on such
13conduct, the board shall place the charge in abeyance if the dispute
14is subject to final and binding arbitration pursuant to the
15memorandum of understanding, and shall dismiss the charge at
16the conclusion of the arbitration process unless the charging party
17demonstrates that the settlement or arbitration award is repugnant
18to the purposes of this chapter.end insert
O
93