BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 543|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 543
          Author:   Campos (D)
          Amended:  6/24/13 in Senate
          Vote:     21


           SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/18/14
          AYES:  Hill, Gaines, Fuller, Hancock, Jackson, Leno, Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De León, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-24, 5/31/13 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    California Environmental Quality Act:  translation

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Office of Planning and  
          Research (Office), on or before July 1, 2016, to prepare and  
          develop recommended amendments to the guidelines for  
          implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act  
          (CEQA) relative to translation of CEQA notices, and requires the  
          Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency (Secretary), on or  
          before January 1, 2017, to certify and adopt those amendments to  
          the guidelines to establish criteria for a lead agency to assess  
          the need for translating notices into non-English languages, as  
          specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 543
                                                                     Page  
          2


          Existing law establishes CEQA, which:

          1.Requires a lead agency to:

             A.   Prepare and certify the completion of an EIR for a  
               proposed project that it finds would have a significant  
               effect on the environment, or if it finds otherwise, adopt  
               a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration.

             B.   Prepare and file, with either the Office of Planning and  
               Research or the county clerk having jurisdiction over the  
               project, the following notices:

               (1)    A notice of intent when the lead agency decides to  
                 adopt a negative declaration or a mitigated negative  
                 declaration;

               (2)    A notice of determination when the lead agency  
                 decides to carry out or approve a project for which it  
                 has adopted a negative declaration or mitigated negative  
                 declaration, or certified an EIR;

               (3)    A notice of preparation when the lead agency decides  
                 to prepare a negative declaration, a mitigated negative  
                 declaration, or an EIR for the project; and

               (4)    A notice of completion when the draft EIR is  
                 complete.

             A.   Call and provide notice of at least one scoping meeting  
               for projects that may affect highways or other facilities  
               under the Department of Transportation's (Caltrans)  
               jurisdiction if Caltrans requests such a meeting, or for  
               projects of statewide, regional, or area-wide significance.

             B.   Provide and post specified notices.

          1.Authorizes a lead agency to file a notice of exemption when it  
            approves or determines to carry out a project that qualifies  
            for a statutory or categorical exemption from CEQA.

          2.Requires the Office to prepare and develop guidelines for the  
            implementation of CEQA and the Secretary to certify and adopt  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 543
                                                                     Page  
          3

            those guidelines.

          This bill:

          1.Requires the Office to prepare and develop criteria for a lead  
            agency to assess the need for translating scoping meeting  
            notices, notices of preparation, and notices of approval into  
            non-English languages and for posting requirements of such  
            translated notices.
          2.Requires the Office to develop the criteria by July 1, 2016  
            and the Secretary will be required to adopt the criteria into  
            the CEQA guidelines by January 1, 2017.

           Comments
           
          CEQA requires state and local agencies to undergo an  
          environmental review process before carrying out or approving a  
          proposed project.  This allows stakeholders such as a private  
          developer, a public agency, and a local community to consider  
          the significant environmental effects of the proposed project  
          and adopt measures that would minimize or mitigate them.

          With the increasing diversity of California's communities,  
          multi-stakeholder engagement is critical to ensuring that CEQA's  
          environmental goals are achieved in an equitable manner.  The  
          author's office argues that a project may have significant  
          consequences on immigrant and low-income communities who either  
          live at or close to the project site.  But because of their  
          limited ability to communicate in English, they cannot  
          participate in the CEQA process as meaningfully as native  
          English speakers would.

          The state's diverse population has given rise to statutory  
          requirements for translating important consumer and government  
          services documents to popular foreign languages like Spanish and  
          Mandarin.  One example in the Civil Code is the foreign  
          translation of consumer contracts if negotiations between a  
          business representative and a consumer are conducted primarily  
          in Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, or Korean.  The  
          business representative must provide the consumer a copy of the  
          negotiated contract in the foreign language spoken by the  
          consumer during negotiations.

          Another example is the Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 543
                                                                     Page  
          4

          (Gov. Code Sec. 7290 et seq.) which applies to state and local  
          agencies.  Dymally-Alatorre requires state agencies to translate  
          informational documents about government services when 5% or  
          more of the people served by its local office or facility either  
          do not speak English or cannot effectively communicate in  
          English because it is not their native language. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           One-time costs in the low to mid-hundreds of thousands of  
            dollars from the General Fund to OPR to develop recommended  
            regulations.

           Cost pressures at least in the hundreds of thousands of  
            dollars from General and special funds to various state  
            agencies acting as the lead agency under CEQA for translation  
            costs.

           SUPPORT  :   (Per Senate Environmental Quality Committee analysis  
          of 5/24/14--Unable to reverify at time of writing)

          Asian Pacific Environmental Network
          California Coastal Protection Network
          California Coastkeeper Alliance
          California Environmental Justice Alliance
          California Native Plant Society
          Center on Race, Poverty, and the Environment
          Clean Water Action California
          Coalition for Clean Air
          Committee for Green Foothills
          Communities for a Better Environment
          Endangered Habitats League
          Environment California
          Environmental Defense Center
          Foothills Conservancy
          Forests Forever
          Friends of the Eel River
          Laguna Greenbelt, Inc.
          Nichols-Berman Environmental Planning
          North Country Watch
          Planning and Conservation League

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 543
                                                                     Page  
          5

          Sierra Club California
          The City Project
          Transportation Solutions Defense and Education Fund

           OPPOSITION  :    (Per Senate Environmental Quality Committee  
          analysis of 5/24/14--Unable to reverify at time of writing)

          American Council of Engineering Companies, California
          American Planning Association, California Chapter
          Associated Builders and Contractors of California
          Association of California Healthcare Districts
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California Association of Realtors
          California Association of Sanitation Agencies
          California Association of School Business Officials
          California Building Industry Association
          California Business Properties Association
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Grocers Association
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          California Municipal Utilities Association
          California Special Districts Association
          California State Association of Counties
          Friant Water Authority
          Irvine Ranch Water District
          Orange County Board of Supervisors
          Rural County Representatives of California
          Three Valleys Municipal Water District
          Urban Counties Caucus  
           
           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-24, 5/31/13
          AYES:  Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong,  
            Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,  
            Hall, Roger Hernández, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal,  
            Mitchell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel  
            Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone,  
            Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Allen, Bigelow, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth  
            Gaines, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Linder, Logue,  
            Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Nestande, Olsen,  
            Patterson, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Chávez, Holden, Medina, Vacancy

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     AB 543
                                                                     Page  
          6



          RM:e  8/16/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****






































                                                                CONTINUED