BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 548
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 548 (Salas)
As Amended January 7, 2014
Majority vote
HIGHER EDUCATION 13-0 APPROPRIATIONS 16-0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Williams, Chávez, Bloom, |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow, Allen, |
| |Fong, Fox, Jones-Sawyer, | |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian |
| |Levine, Linder, | |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
| |Dickinson, Olsen, | |Gomez, Holden, Linder, |
| |Quirk-Silva, Weber, Wilk | |Pan, Quirk, |
| | | |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner, |
| | | |Weber |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Removes the sunset on the California Community College
(CCC) districts' associate degree nursing (ADN) programs
admissions process and specifies that CCC districts using this
multicriteria screening process for ADN admissions must continue
to report annually to the CCC Chancellor's Office (CCCCO).
EXISTING LAW :
1)Allows CCC districts to use any diagnostic assessment tools
that are commonly used in registered nursing programs and
approved by the CCC Chancellor and, if, after using an
approved diagnostic tool, the CCC registered nursing program
determines that the number of applicants to the program
exceeds its capacity, the program is authorized to use
additional multicriteria screening measures. Current law also
allows a CCC district to a) exclude an applicant to a
registered nursing program if the applicant is not a resident
of that district or has not completed prerequisite courses in
that district; and, b) implement policies, procedures, and
systems, including, but not limited to, priority registration
systems, that have the effect of excluding an applicant or
student who is not a resident of that district from a
registered nursing program of that district (Education Code
(EC) Section 78261.3).
2)Requires CCC districts to adopt and implement merit-based
AB 548
Page 2
admissions policies for nursing programs if, for any academic
term, there are more applicants seeking enrollment in that
program than may reasonably be accommodated (EC Section
78261.5).
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, costs for this bill would be minor ongoing absorbable
costs for the CCCCO to receive and summarize reports provided by
the districts.
COMMENTS : Need for the bill. According to the author,
California continues to suffer from a serious nursing shortage.
The author states, "There are many individuals seeking admission
to our [CCC] nursing programs and yet, approximately 12,000
applicants are turned away every year due to a lack of space."
Background. CCC ADN program admissions. In the early 1990s, a
controversy arose over merit-based or competitive admissions to
ADN programs. The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education
Fund (MALDEF) threatened a lawsuit because students of color
were being disproportionately denied admission to impacted
programs. In the negotiations that ensued, MALDEF agreed not to
bring suit, and the CCC Board of Governors (BOG) agreed to
develop program admissions criteria that would be validated as
relevant to future performance. BOG regulations in the
mid-1990s prohibited ADN programs from using evaluative
mechanisms---usually grade point average (GPA)---unless the
district could validate its practices in a complex research
initiative, a requirement that proved too difficult for colleges
without sufficient research staff. CCC districts were told to
undertake the research or rely on lottery or other
non-evaluative mechanisms. Lotteries and wait lists were
instituted; completion rates fell.
The CCCCO then began a project (as a district grant) to research
a full range of variables, seeking those that would be
statistically correlated with nursing program student success in
the hopes of finding six colleges for which validation could be
achieved. In 2002, the CCCCO announced results, finding that
four factors best predict student success in completing nursing
programs: Overall college GPA, English GPA, Core Biology GPA
(Anatomy, Physiology, Microbiology), and Core Biology course
repetitions. (Students with fewer repetitions have a higher
probability of success.) CCC districts were then advised in an
AB 548
Page 3
October 2002 memo that they could begin using these criteria,
but in order to do so, local research must first be performed,
"If the decision is made to adopt the measures as a
prerequisite, and to set cut scores that will result in defined
program completion rates, then districts must analyze and
monitor the possibility of disproportionate impact on particular
groups of students defined in terms of race, ethnicity, gender,
age, or disability."
The districts were also warned, "It is appropriate to consider
potential risks of implementing this research. The adoption of
the prerequisite measures and the implementation of the
composite formula could result in rationing access. Unless the
implementation of these measures is done carefully according to
the guidelines discussed later in this memo, it could conflict
with the requirement for open access."
At that time, the CCCCO acknowledged the severity of the nursing
shortage and asserted to its ADN program directors, "The biggest
part of the solution is in increasing the number of spaces; the
lesser part of the solution is in improving success rates."
AB 1559 (Berryhill), Chapter 712, Statutes of 2007. Assembly
Member Berryhill introduced AB 1559 15 years after the
controversy first erupted. AB 1559 sought to address the fact
that some CCC districts had been left with "non-evaluative"
mechanisms, that is, a lottery or a waiting list because they
simply had not found the resources to comply with the
resource-intensive rules promulgated by the CCCCO (as described
above).
The provisions implemented by AB 1559 contain a sunset clause
that EC Section 78261.5 (as described above in the current law
section of this analysis) shall remain in effect only until
January 1, 2016, and as of that date will be repealed, unless a
later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2016,
deletes or extends that date.
To note, this bill seeks to delete the sunset date of January 1,
2016, because, according to the CCCCO, of the CCC campuses
implementing AB 1559, there has been an average decrease in
attrition rates of 13.25% and depending on the campus, either an
increase in student diversity or no known changes to student
diversity.
AB 548
Page 4
Nursing shortage. The U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services has projected that by 2015, 400,000 new nurses will be
needed just to fill the vacancies left by retirees.
Additionally, by 2020, the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
predicts that it will be short between 800,000 and one million
new and replacement nurses, including being short close to
117,000 in California alone.
According to a recent study by the University of California, San
Francisco, the supply and demand for nurses in California varies
by region. The report found that the Inland Empire region is
experiencing the hardest difficulties in their ability to hire
trained nurses. However, the San Francisco Bay region is
expected to have the largest regional decrease in overall hiring
of trained nurses. Additionally, the report found that many new
nurses in California are finding it more and more challenging to
find hospital nursing jobs.
Based on a 2011 presentation to the Legislature by the
Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), it was recommended that the
Legislature should implement additional measures to reduce CCC
attrition rates. During this same presentation, the LAO also
opined that despite recent efforts to expand access to nursing
programs, the number of applicants to CCC nursing programs far
exceeds available slots. To note, the LAO found that the CCC is
able to accommodate less than 30% of their applications.
Analysis Prepared by : Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916)
319-3960
FN: 0002991