BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 551 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 15, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 551 (Ting) - As Amended: April 29, 2013 Policy Committee: Local GovernmentVote:7 - 0 Agriculture 7 - 0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill allows a county to establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (UAIZ) for the purpose of supporting urban agriculture. Specifically, this bill: 1)Prohibits a county from establishing a UAIZ within any portion of a city or the city's spheres of influence, unless that city has adopted an authorizing ordinance. 2)Requires UAIZ contracts to allow for structures that support agricultural activities, including, but not limited to, toolsheds, greenhouses, produce stands, and instructional space. 3)Requires assessors to consider the enforceable restrictions placed on an urban agriculture parcel when assessing the property for property tax purposes. FISCAL EFFECT Restricting the allowable uses of land within urban areas to an agricultural use is likely to reduce the assessed value of the land and potentially the amount of property tax owners pay on those parcels. Property tax revenues are allocated to units of local government according to existing law on the distribution of local property tax. To the extent this bill reduces the revenues flowing to school districts, there would be a corresponding cost to the General Fund as the property tax would otherwise offset General AB 551 Page 2 Fund obligations to schools, pursuant to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee. The actual impact to the General Fund is unknown because it will depend on the number of counties adopting urban agriculture ordinances and the number of properties entering into contracts limiting the use to urban agriculture. The loss of revenue could be anywhere from several hundred thousand dollars per year to millions of dollars. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . According to the author, many properties in urban areas lie undeveloped for many years for various reasons. These properties can blight the surrounding neighborhood. This bill seeks to create an incentive for the owners of these properties to use their properties for urban agriculture in order to create a green space and a local food source for the community. This bill allows a county to enter into a contract with the landowner, in which the property must be used for urban agriculture in return for a lower property tax rate. Supporters state that by reducing the landowner's property tax rate, property owners may be encouraged to convert the land to an urban agricultural use. The reduced tax rate could serve as an incentive to lease the land for urban agriculture rather than leaving the property unused. 2)Background . Urban agriculture is the practice of cultivating, processing, and distributing food in or around a town or city. Urban agriculture can take the form of community gardens, where residents of a neighborhood cultivate individual plots in a communal garden for individual consumption. Alternatively, urban farms can be operated by one individual or a group of individuals who produce agricultural products to sell to consumers. Proponents of urban agriculture note that this type of agriculture increases the amount of food available to people living in cities, and allows fresh vegetables, fruits, and meat products to be made available to urban consumers. It has the potential to decrease food deserts and food swamps. Because urban agriculture promotes energy-saving local food production, urban and peri-urban agriculture are generally seen as sustainable agriculture. AB 551 Page 3 3)Clarifying Amendment . As currently drafted, the bill may not apply to the city and county of San Francisco since the bill refers to counties only. The bill should be amended to specifically state that it applies to both a county and a city and county. Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 319-2081