AB 566, as introduced, Wieckowski. Courts: personal services contracting.
The Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act establishes a trial court employee personnel system that provides authority to hire trial court personnel, regulates the classification and compensation of trial court employees, labor relations, and personnel files, and requires each trial court to establish a system of employment selection and advancement and an employment protection system.
Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts to achieve cost savings if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee organization for compliance with those standards.
This bill would establish specified standards if a trial court intends to contract for any services that are currently or customarily performed by trial court employees. Among other things, the bill would require the trial court to clearly demonstrate that the contract will result in actual overall cost savings to the trial court for the duration of the entire contract as compared with the trial court’s actual costs of providing the same services. The bill would require a contract for services in excess of $100,00 annually to include specific, measurable performance standards and provisions for audits on performance and cost savings, as specified.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 71621 is added to the Government Code,
2to read:
(a) If a trial court intends to contract for any services
4that are currently or customarily performed by trial court
5employees, all of the following requirements shall apply:
6(1) The trial court shall clearly demonstrate that the contract
7will result in actual overall cost savings to the trial court for the
8duration of the entire contract as compared with the trial court’s
9actual costs of providing the same services. In comparing costs,
10all of the following shall occur:
11(A) The trial court’s additional cost of providing the same
12services as proposed by the contract shall be included. These
13additional costs shall include the salaries and benefits of additional
14staff that would be
needed and the cost of additional space,
15equipment, and materials needed to perform the services.
16(B) The trial court’s indirect overhead costs shall not be included
17unless those costs can be attributed solely to the function in
18question and would not exist if that function was not performed
19by the trial court. For purposes of this subparagraph, “indirect
20overhead costs” means the pro rata share of existing administrative
21salaries and benefits, rent, equipment costs, utilities, and materials.
22(C) The cost of a contractor providing a service for any
23continuing trial court costs that would be directly associated with
24the contracted function shall be included. Continuing trial court
25costs shall include, but not be limited to, costs for inspection,
26supervision, and monitoring.
27(2) The contract shall not be approved
solely on the basis that
28savings will result from lower contractor pay rates or benefits.
29Contracts shall be eligible for approval if the contractor’s wages
30are at the industry’s level and do not undercut trial court pay rates.
P3 1(3) The contract shall not cause an existing trial court employee
2to incur a loss of his or her employment or employment seniority,
3a reduction in wages, benefits, or hours, or an involuntary transfer
4to a new location requiring a change in residence.
5(4) The contract shall be awarded through a publicized,
6competitive bidding process.
7(5) The contract shall include specific provisions pertaining to
8the qualifications of the staff that will perform the work under the
9contract, as well as assurances that the contractor’s hiring practices
10meet applicable nondiscrimination standards.
11(6) The contract shall provide that it may be terminated at any
12time by the trial court without penalty if there is a material breach
13of the contract and notice is provided within 30 days of termination.
14(7) If the contract is for services in excess of one hundred
15thousand dollars ($100,000) annually, all of the following shall
16occur:
17(A) The trial court shall require the contractor to disclose all of
18the following information as part of its bid, application, or answer
19to a request for proposal:
20(i) A description of all charges, claims, or complaints filed
21against the contractor with a federal, state, or local administrative
22agency during the prior 10 years.
23(ii) A description of all civil
complaints filed against the
24contractor in a state or federal court during the prior 10 years.
25(iii) A description of all state or federal criminal complaints or
26indictments filed against the contractor, or any of its officers,
27directors, or managers, at any time.
28(iv) A description of any debarments of the contractor by a
29public agency or licensing body at any time.
30(B) The trial court shall include in the contract specific,
31measurable performance standards and provisions for a
32performance audit by the trial court, or an independent auditor
33approved by the trial court, to determine whether the performance
34standards are being met and whether the contractor is in compliance
35with applicable laws and regulations. The trial court shall not renew
36or extend the contract prior to receiving and considering the audit
37
report.
38(C) The contract shall include provisions for an audit by the
39trial court, or an independent auditor approved by the trial court,
40to determine whether and to what extent the anticipated cost
P4 1savings have actually been realized. The trial court shall not renew
2or extend the contract before receiving and considering the audit
3report.
4(8) The term of the contract shall not be more than five years
5from the date on which the trial court approves the contract.
6(b) This section does not preclude a trial court or the Judicial
7Council from adopting more restrictive rules regarding the
8contracting of court services.
O
99