AB 576, as introduced, V. Manuel Pérez. Centralized Intelligence Partnership Act: pilot program.
Existing law requires various state entities, including, but not limited to, the State Board of Equalization, the Franchise Tax Board, and the Department of Justice, to enforce laws relating to the taxation and legal operation of businesses throughout the state under their respective jurisdictions.
This bill would establish, until January 1, 2019, a pilot program to create a multiagency partnership consisting of the Employment Development Department, Franchise Tax Board, and State Board of Equalization, to be known as the Centralized Intelligence Partnership, to collaborate in combating illegal underground operations by, among other activities, providing a central intake process and organizational structure, with an administrator and support staff, to document, review, and evaluate data and complaints. The bill would authorize other specified state entities to participate in the pilot program in an advisory capacity. The bill would create an advisory committee, comprised of one representative from each entity in the partnership, and those serving in an advisory capacity, as specified, to provide guidance on the activities and operations of the partnership. The bill would require the advisory committee to the partnership to determine the appropriate agency to house the processing center for the partnership. The bill would authorize duly authorized representatives of members of the partnership to exchange information for the purpose of investigating illegal underground operations. The bill would require the partnership, on or before July 1, 2015, to annually report to the Legislature and entities participating in the partnership on its activities. The bill would require an additional report to be filed with the Legislature by December 1, 2017, to include the number of complaints received by the partnership and cases investigated or prosecuted, as specified.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) According to the Employment Development Department’s
4analysis of findings made by the Internal Revenue Service, the
5underground economy in California is estimated to be between
6sixty billion dollars ($60,000,000,000) and one hundred forty
7billion dollars ($140,000,000,000) each year.
8(b) According to the State Board of Equalization, an estimate
9of eight billion dollars ($8,000,000,000) in corporate, personal,
10and sales and use taxes goes uncollected in California each year,
11with unreported and underreported economic activity responsible
12for the vast majority of that total.
13(c) For purposes of this section, “underground economy” means
14the activities of individuals, businesses, or other entities that
15knowingly and intentionally use practices designed to conceal
16illegal or fraudulent activities that negatively impact legitimate
17businesses, workers, and consumers, as well as deprive the state
18and local governments of vital resources.
19(d) The underground economy hurts all Californians. Revenues
20to support government services are lost, workers are forced to go
21without basic employment protections, and legitimate businesses
22are confronted with unfair competition.
23(e) Since the activities of many operating in the underground
24economy span across multiple jurisdictions, various joint agency
25enforcement efforts have been undertaken to combat the
P3 1underground economy, including, but not limited to,
the creation
2of the Joint Enforcement Strike Force on the Underground
3Economy in 1993, and the creation of the Economic and
4Employment Enforcement Coalition in 2005. Furthermore, various
5individual agency efforts have been created, including, but not
6limited to, the State Board of Equalization’s Statewide Compliance
7and Outreach Program and the Contractors’ State License Board’s
8Statewide Investigative Fraud Team. Thus, investigative
9collaboration among state agencies is not a new concept in
10California. Many collaborative efforts are already under way,
11pursuant to which investigators periodically meet to discuss current
12investigations, collaborate to conduct sting operations, and develop
13best practices policies.
14(f) Despite significant statewide efforts, California continues
15to lose billions of dollars in annual revenue due to the underground
16economy.
17(g) The Legislature intends
this act to enhance existing efforts
18to combat the underground economy by institutionalizing
19collaboration among state agencies through a Centralized
20Intelligence Partnership, a pilot program that acquires relevant
21data for collaborative data analysis, economic threat assessment,
22strategic planning, and provides a referral tracking and value-added
23referral disbursement process to monitor the progress and measure
24the success of the partnership activities. This collaborative effort
25to combat the underground economy will, in turn, further aid the
26state in its progress toward preventing human trafficking. The
27Legislature recognizes that the state needs to comprehensively
28address the underground economy and capitalize on each agency’s
29enforcement efforts and investigative resources by creating the
30Centralized Intelligence Partnership. A key element of this effort
31is to authorize and facilitate data and intelligence sharing among
32the Centralized Intelligence Partnership and state agencies. It is
33the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this act to focus on the
34criminal and civil prosecution of those operating in the
35underground economy in flagrant violation of the law. Businesses
36that are in compliance with state employment, safety, licensing,
37and tax laws that are found to have committed minor or inadvertent
38violations of existing law are to be addressed through other
39administrative procedures.
P4 1(h) It is the intent of the Legislature that this act be part of
2ongoing efforts by the Legislature to combat the underground
3economy in this state through legislation.
Part 12.2 (commencing with Section 15910) is added
5to Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read:
6
This part shall be known, and may be cited, as the
11Centralized Intelligence Partnership Act.
(a) The Centralized Intelligence Partnership is hereby
13established in state government as a pilot program.
14(b) For purposes of this part, the term “partnership” shall refer
15to the Centralized Intelligence Partnership.
(a) The partnership shall include all of the following
17state entities:
18(1) Employment Development Department.
19(2) Franchise Tax Board.
20(3) State Board of Equalization.
21(b) In addition to the agencies listed in subdivision (a), the
22following agencies may participate in the pilot program in an
23advisory capacity to the partnership:
24(1) California Health and Human Services Agency.
25(2) Department of Consumer Affairs.
26(3) Department of Industrial Relations.
27(4) Department of Insurance.
28(5) Department of Justice.
29(6) Department of Motor Vehicles.
30(c) If, in its normal course of investigation, an agency listed in
31subdivision (b) discovers a violation of law that would result in
32increased tax revenues to the state, that agency shall notify the
33appropriate tax agency listed in subdivision (a).
(a) The advisory committee to the Centralized
35Intelligence Partnership is hereby established to provide guidance
36to, and advice on, the activities and operations of the partnership.
37(b) The advisory committee shall be comprised of one
38representative from each of the entities in the partnership listed
39under subdivision (a) of Section 15914. Each representative shall
40be appointed by the head of the entity in the partnership and serve
P5 1at the pleasure of the appointing authority. An agency participating
2in an advisory capacity may provide a representative to the advisory
3committee to offer guidance and advice to the partnership.
4(c) The advisory committee shall meet as needed, but at
least
5quarterly, to conduct its business.
(a) To serve the best interests of the state by combating
7the underground economy, the partnership shall do all of the
8following to combat illegal underground operations:
9(1) Provide a central intake process and organizational structure
10to document, review, and evaluate data and complaints.
11(2) Establish a processing center to receive and analyze data,
12share complaints, and research leads from the input of each
13impacted agency.
14(3) Provide participating and nonparticipating agencies with
15value-added investigative leads where collaboration opportunities
16exist for felony-level criminal investigations, including, but
not
17limited to, referring leads to agencies with appropriate enforcement
18jurisdiction.
19(4) Provide that each participating and nonparticipating agency
20retain jurisdictional authority over whether to pursue partnership
21strategies or collaborative investigative leads based upon the
22direction of their respective governing structures or available
23resources.
24(5) Document and provide intake data analysis, analytic data
25findings, referrals, collaborative opportunities, outcomes, emerging
26evasion trends, lessons learned, as well as additional enforcement,
27administrative, and legislative opportunities.
28(b) The scope of activities and projects undertaken by the
29partnership shall be consistent with the amount of funds
30appropriated by the Legislature.
31(c) The advisory committee to the partnership shall determine
32the appropriate agency to house the processing center for the
33partnership.
34(d) The partnership may hire an administrator and staff.
Duly authorized representatives of members of the
36partnership, and agencies participating in an advisory capacity,
37may exchange intelligence, data, documents, information,
38complaints, or lead referrals for the purpose of investigating illegal
39underground operations. Any member or ex-member of the
40partnership, any agent employed by any member of the partnership,
P6 1or any person who has at any time obtained such knowledge from
2any of the foregoing partners or persons, shall not divulge, or make
3known in any manner not provided by law, any of the confidential
4information received by, or reported to, the partnership.
5Information exchanged pursuant to this section shall retain its
6confidential status and shall remain subject to the confidentiality
7provisions contained in the following provisions:
8(a) California Health and Human Services Agency: Subdivision
9(c) of Section 6254 of this code and Section 14100.2 of the Welfare
10and Institutions Code.
11(b) Department of Consumer Affairs: Section 30 of the Business
12and Professions Code and Section 56.29 of the Civil Code.
13(c) Department of Industrial Relations: Sections 11181, 11183,
14and 15553 of this code, Article 7 (commencing with Section 1877)
15of Chapter 12 of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code, and
16Sections 92, 138.7, 1026, 3762, 6309, 6322, 6396, and 6412 of
17the Labor Code.
18(d) Department of Insurance: Section 11180 of this code and
19Sections 1872.6, 1873, 1874.2, 1875.1, 1877.1, 1877.3, 1877.4,
20and 1877.5 of the Insurance Code.
21(e) Department of Justice: Section 11183.
22(f) Department of Motor Vehicles: Sections 1808.2, 1808.4,
231808.5, 1808.6, 1808.21, 1808.24, and 12800.5 of the Vehicle
24Code.
25(g) Employment Development Department: Sections 1094 and
261095 of the Unemployment Insurance Code.
27(h) Franchise Tax Board: Sections 19542, 19542.1, and 19542.3
28of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
29(i) State Board of Equalization: Section 15619 of this code,
30Section 42464.8 of the Public Resources Code, and Sections 7056,
317056.5, 8255, 9255, 9255.1, 30455, 38705, 38706, 43651, 45981,
3245982, 45983, 45984, 46751, 50159, 50160, 50161, 55381, 60608,
33and 60609 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
On or before July 1, 2015, and annually thereafter, the
35partnership shall report on its activities and accomplishments to
36the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795, and to each entity
37in the partnership.
The partnership shall submit to the Legislature on or
39before December 1, 2017, and in compliance with Section 9795,
P7 1a report of the pilot program that includes, but is not limited to,
2the following information:
3(a) The number of leads or complaints received by the
4partnership.
5(b) The number of cases investigated or prosecuted through
6civil action or criminal prosecution.
7(c) Recommendations for modifying, eliminating, or continuing
8the operation of any or all of the provisions of this part.
This part shall remain in effect only until January 1,
102019, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
11that is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date.
O
99