BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 617
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 8, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                   AB 617 (Nazarian) - As Amended:  April 15, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:13-6

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill establishes, as required by federal law, appeal rights  
          and procedures for an applicant or enrollee who receives an  
          adverse action, decision, or inaction by the California Health  
          Benefit Exchange (known as Covered California).  Specifically,  
          this bill:

          1)Applies to enrollment, eligibility, or ineligibility for a  
            state health subsidy program, advance payment of the premium  
            tax credits (APTC), and cost-sharing reductions, and the  
            amount of the APTC or cost-sharing or eligibility for  
            affordable plan options. 

          2)Includes the right to appeal the determination of an exemption  
            from penalties for failing to meet minimum standards for  
            obtaining health care coverage and failure to provide timely  
            notices as specified.  

          3)Requires Covered California to contract with the Department of  
            Social Services (DSS) for this purpose.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Major costs, in the tens of millions of dollars, for the DSS  
            State Hearings Division to modify current appeals system and  
            increase staff.  Actual costs are dependent on caseload with  
            an assumption of a 2.5% appeal rate.  Potentially significant  
            costs for the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS),  
            (Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB) and Covered  
            California to coordinate with DSS.

          2)Potential GF offsets from federal grant funding for Covered  








                                                                  AB 617
                                                                  Page  2

            California (through the end of 2014), health plan fees, and  
            federal matching funds for Medi-Cal and Access for Infants and  
            Mothers (AIM) programs.
           
           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  This bill seeks to establish an equitable notice  
            and "no wrong door" appeals procedure for both Medi-Cal and  
            Covered California determinations, which includes  
            determinations based on new Modified Adjusted Gross Income  
            (MAGI) rules.  The existing DSS fair hearing process serves as  
            the appeals entity in this bill.  Based on changes in state  
            and federal law, eligibility and access to public programs  
            should be more streamlined.  By using the existing appeals  
            procedure through DSS, this bill implements a statewide  
            approach for seamless enrollment so that no matter where a  
            consumer applies, there is a defined process in place for next  
            steps if an appeal is needed.

           2)Efficiency, Fairness, Cost-effectiveness  .  The Western Center  
            on Law and Poverty, this bill's sponsor, argues costs would be  
            allocated between programs (Medi-Cal, AIM, and Covered  
            California) and Covered California costs are paid by a federal  
            grant through the end of 2014.  This bill leverages existing  
            systems in order to provide cost-effective and efficient  
            compliance with federal law.  Further, Western Center notes  
            appeal rights should be in statute rather than regulation.   
            Although Covered California has rulemaking authority, Western  
            Center asserts due process rights are properly placed in  
            statute, consistent with existing appeals provisions for  
            Healthy Families, AIM, and Medi-Cal.  Additional details could  
            be placed in regulation.

           3)Related legislation  .  AB 2 X1 (Pan) and SB 2 X1 (Ed Hernandez)  
            enact substantially similar provisions to implement the  
            Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance provisions related to  
            health insurance regulated under the Insurance Code and the  
            Health and Safety Code, respectively. Both bills have passed  
            both houses of the legislature and will soon be on the  
            Governor's desk.

               AB 1 X1 (John A. P�rez) and SB 1 X1 (Ed Hernandez and  
               Steinberg) implement various provisions of the ACA  
               regarding Medi-Cal eligibility and program simplification  
               including the use of MAGI and Medi-Cal eligibility  








                                                                  AB 617
                                                                  Page  3

               expansion.  AB 1 X1 is pending in the Senate; SB 1 X1 is  
               pending in the Assembly.

               SB 3 X1 (Ed Hernandez) requires Covered California to  
               establish a "bridge" plan product by contracting with  
               Medi-Cal managed care plans for individuals losing Medi-Cal  
               coverage (for example, because of an increase in income),  
               the parents of Medi-Cal children, and individuals with  
               incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL). SB 3  
               X1 is pending referral in the Assembly.

               SB 28 (Ed Hernandez and Steinberg) implements various ACA  
               provisions regarding Medi-Cal eligibility and program  
               simplification.  SB 28 is pending in Senate Appropriations  
               Committee.

               AB 50 (Pan) requires DHCS to establish a process to allow  
               hospitals to make a preliminary determination of a person's  
               eligibility for Medi-Cal.  AB 50 is pending in Assembly  
               Health Committee. 
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debra Roth / APPR. / (916) 319-2081