BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                AB 639
                                                                Page  1

        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 639 (John A. Pérez)
        As Amended  September 4, 2013
        2/3 vote.  Urgency
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY:  |77-0 |(May 29, 2013)  |SENATE: |36-0 |(September 10, |
        |           |     |                |        |     |2013)          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
         Original Committee Reference:    H. & C.D.  

         SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the issuance of $600 million in general  
        obligation (GO) bonds to fund the acquisition, construction,  
        rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily supportive housing,  
        affordable transitional housing, affordable rental housing, and  
        related facilities for veterans and their families, if approved by  
        the voters at the June, 2014, statewide election.

         The Senate amendments  :

        1)Move the measure from the November 2014 ballot to the June 2014  
          ballot.

        2)Remove all references to using bond proceeds to fund services.

        3)Designate the Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet), rather than  
          the Department of Housing and Development (HCD), as the board for  
          purposes of the State General Obligation Bond Law.

        4)Require CalVet to carry out the board duties in consultation with  
          HCD and the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA).

        5)Require CalVet, HCD, and CalHFA (the departments) to work  
          collaboratively under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to  
          implement the Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Act of  
          2014, as established by the bill.

        6)Require the departments to enter into the MOU no later than August  
          15, 2014, to address their respective and shared responsibilities  
          in implementing, overseeing, and evaluating the Veterans Housing  
          and Homeless Prevention Act.

        7)Require the departments to submit the MOU to the Senate and  
          Assembly Budget Committees.








                                                                AB 639
                                                                Page  2


        8)Limit the total administrative costs of implementing the bill to  
          5% of the bonds issued. 

        9)Require the departments to ensure that program guidelines and  
          terms provide threshold requirements or scoring criteria that  
          benefit applicants with experience in combining permanent or  
          transitional housing, or both, with supportive services for  
          veterans or for partnering with housing developers or service  
          providers with experience offering housing or services to  
          veterans.

        10)Require that 50% of the funds awarded for capital development  
          serve extremely low-income households and that 60% of those units  
          be supportive housing.

        11)Require that all of a household's income sources upon initial  
          tenancy be taken into consideration in determining whether a  
          potential tenant is eligible for supportive, affordable, or  
          transitional housing targeted to extremely low income households.

        12)Allow the departments to fund projects consisting of fewer than  
          five units, in addition to projects of five or more units.

        13)Allow the departments to fund projects serving mixed-income  
          populations.

        14)Exempt any guidelines and terms developed to implement the bill  
          from the Administrative Procedures Act.

        15)Provide that the bill does not permit the departments to  
          purchase, operate, or manage properties except in the event of a  
          foreclosure on a borrower or grantee.

        16)Require HCD, in its annual report to the Governor and the  
          Legislature, to include an evaluation, in collaboration with  
          CalVet, of any programs established to expend proceeds from the  
          bonds.

        17)Make technical and clarifying changes.
         
        AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill was substantially similar to  
        the version that was passed by the Senate.
         
        FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:








                                                                AB 639
                                                                Page  3

         
         1)Total debt service of approximately $25 million annually (General  
          Fund).  

         2)Approximately $220,000 in one-time ballot printing/mailing costs  
          (General Fund).  
         
         COMMENTS  :  Various studies indicate that veterans are more likely  
        than the general population to become homeless, and make up a  
        disproportionate share of the homeless population.  Although  
        veterans are only about 8% of the U.S. population, they make up  
        approximately 15% to 20% of the homeless population.  Veterans'  
        homelessness is particularly acute in certain parts of the country,  
        including California, which is home to 25%, or about 19,000, of the  
        nation's homeless veterans. Los Angeles alone is home to over 8,000  
        homeless veterans.  With respect to the nation's homeless veterans  
        who are unsheltered, nearly 44% are located in California. 

        In addition to the veterans who are already experiencing  
        homelessness, there are many more veterans who have unstable housing  
        situations that place them at risk of homelessness.  For some,  
        remaining housed may be as basic as having more affordable housing  
        options.  For others, the challenges are more complex and may  
        involve a range of issues from lack of job training to needing  
        ongoing treatment for substance abuse or mental health issues.  

        Numerous studies have shown that providing housing along with the  
        supportive services individuals need to address mental health,  
        substance abuse, and other issues has a net benefit in terms of  
        public costs.  For example, in 2009, the Los Angeles Economic  
        Roundtable compared the public costs for individuals in supportive  
        housing compared to similar individuals who were homeless.  The  
        study concluded that the typical public cost for a homeless person  
        is $2,897 per month, compared with just $605 per month in public  
        cost for a resident in supportive housing.  The stabilizing effect  
        of housing plus supportive services is demonstrated by a 79%  
        reduction in public costs.  In short, public costs go down when  
        people are no longer homeless.

        Despite California's high number of homeless veterans, the state  
        does not have any programs that are directly targeted at serving  
        this population, or at serving lower-income veterans who are at risk  
        of homelessness.  HCD offers various programs that support the  
        development of multifamily rental housing for low income  
        Californians, including supportive and transitional housing, but  








                                                                AB 639
                                                                Page  4

        none are veteran-specific.  HCD's programs have been funded since  
        2002 from two voter-approved housing bonds, Proposition 46 of 2002  
        and Proposition 1C of 2006.  These funds are nearly gone and it is  
        unclear when additional funds will be available.  In addition, the  
        elimination of redevelopment agencies meant a loss of around $1  
        billion per year in affordable housing funding, funds that generally  
        worked in concert with state dollars and other sources of funding to  
        produce affordable units for lower-income Californians.

        CalVet runs the California Veteran Farm and Home Purchase Program,  
        often referred to as the CalVet Home Loan Program, which was  
        established in 1921 and reauthorized in 1943 and again in 1974.  The  
        program provides loans to veterans for single-family residences,  
        including condominiums and planned unit developments; farms; units  
        in cooperative developments; and mobilehomes in rental parks or on  
        land owned by the veteran.  While the program has assisted over  
        420,000 veterans over the years, it has seen a sharp decline in  
        activity over the last decade.  In 2003, the program issued 1,130  
        new loans; in 2012 it issued just 83.  In the same time period, the  
        program's portfolio of outstanding loans declined from 20,169 to  
        7,913. 

        CalVet's Home Loan Program is funded primarily by veterans' bonds, a  
        type of tax-exempt GO bond.  Although GO bonds are always backed by  
        the full faith and credit of the state, the bonds issued for the  
        CalVet home loan program are unusual because the payments made by  
        the veterans participating in the program always have been  
        sufficient to retire the bonds.  The program has never had a General  
        Fund cost.  The Legislature has placed on the ballot and California  
        voters have approved 23 veterans' bonds since 1943 to provide  
        funding for the program.  The most recent was Proposition 12 in  
        2008, which authorized $900 million in bonding authority.  The prior  
        bond, Proposition 32 of 2000, authorized $500 million in bonding  
        authority.  To date, CalVet has not issued any of the bonds approved  
        under Proposition 12, and has about $230 million in bonding  
        authority left under Proposition 32.

        This bill establishes the Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention  
        Bond Act of 2014 to restructure $600 million of the $900 million in  
        bonds approved by the voters for the CalVet Home Loan Program in  
        2008 and use them to fund the acquisition, construction,  
        rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily supportive housing,  
        affordable transitional housing, affordable rental housing, and  
        related facilities for veterans and their families.  The move would  
        leave CalVet with $530 million in bonds for its home loan program.   








                                                                AB 639
                                                                Page  5

        The bill tasks HCD, CalVet, and the California Housing Finance  
        Agency with collaboratively administering the new funding program  
        and restricts the use of bond proceeds to housing units designated  
        for veterans and their families.  Restructuring the bonds requires  
        voter approval, which would be sought at the June 3, 2014, statewide  
        election.


         Analysis Prepared by  :    Anya Lawler / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085


                                                                 FN: 0002728