Amended in Assembly May 20, 2013

Amended in Assembly March 19, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 667


Introduced by Assembly Member Roger Hernández

February 21, 2013


An act to add Sections 65928.3, 65928.4, 65928.7, 65935, and 65957.3 to the Government Code, relating to land use.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 667, as amended, Roger Hernández. Land use: development project review: superstores.

The Permit Streamlining Act within the Planning and Zoning Law requires the lead agency that has the principal responsibility for approving a development project, as defined, to approve or disapprove the project within a specified number of days from the date of certification of an environmental impact report, the date of the adoption of a negative declaration, or the determination by the lead agency that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.

This billbegin delete would,end delete in addition,begin insert wouldend insert require a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, prior to approving or disapproving a proposed development project that would permit the construction of a superstore retailer,begin delete as defined,end deletebegin insert or where a superstore would be the recipient of over $100,000 in financial assistance,end insert to cause an economic impact report to be prepared, as specified, to be paid for by the project applicant, and that includes specified assessments and projections, including, among other things, an assessment of the effect that the proposed superstore will have onbegin delete specifiedend delete designated economic assistance areas,begin delete as defined,end delete and an assessment of the effect that the proposed superstore will have on retail operations and employment in the same market area. The bill would also require the governing body to provide an opportunity for public comment on the economic impact report.begin insert The bill would define certain terms for these purposes.end insert By increasing the duties of local public officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would additionally find and declare that these provisions are an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

It is the intent of the Legislature to promote
2economic development in all communities of the state and in
3particular in identifiedbegin delete Economic Assistance Areas,end deletebegin insert economic
4assistance areas,end insert
with the goal of creating good jobs, economically
5self-sustaining communities, and promoting a vibrant small
6business sector. It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that the
7superstore retail model meets these goals and does not undermine
8efforts toward those ends. Therefore, the Legislature finds and
9declares all of the following:

10(a) The state has identified geographically targeted economic
11development areas. Each of these areas has related tax incentive
12benefits as well as a variety of locally provided incentives and
13benefits. The purpose of these benefits is to stimulate business
14investment and job creation for qualified disadvantaged individuals
15in state-designated economically distressed areas. Similarly, other
16redevelopment plan areas have been developed by former
17redevelopment agencies and their successor agencies pursuant to
18the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with
19Section 33300) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code),
20with the purpose of revitalizing the economy of local jurisdictions.

P3    1(b) The state and local governments have provided financial
2assistance to certain businesses to stimulate business development
3and job creation.

4(c) It is in the interest of local governments to promote economic
5 development in their jurisdictions.

6(d) Land use decisions are frequently linked to fiscal policy
7because local governments receive a share of sales tax revenues
8generated within their borders. California cities thus often seek
9large sales tax revenue sources, such as superstores, without taking
10into account all of the external economic effects that superstores
11bring to communities.

12(e) Transformations in the big box retail industry have altered
13retail business nationwide. The engine of this change is the retail
14format known as the superstore, a big box retail store that also
15contains the equivalent of a full-service grocery store, with the
16total floor space often three to four times as large as that of a
17conventional supermarket.

18(f) As a result of the restructuring of retail business, particularly
19the grocery sector in California, the following effects may be seen:
20local grocers, who yield a greater community return on investment,
21are driven out of business; anchor stores to other local businesses
22are closed down impacting many small businesses, and resulting
23in less community access to viable superstore alternatives; lower
24wages and benefits paid to grocery workers by superstore retailers;
25and a host of complex land use, traffic, and fiscal impacts.

26(g) Superstores typically combine a large variety of discount
27general merchandise with full-service grocery sales to the general
28public under one roof, thereby generating more intense land use
29and environmental impacts than other large-scale retailers and
30wholesale membership clubs.

31(h) Industry and academic studies indicate superstores rarely
32add any retail services not currently provided within a community,
33and the majority of sales growth at a superstore comes from a
34direct shift of dollars from existing retailers within a community,
35primarily from grocery stores.

36(i) Land use decisions regarding superstores fall to city and
37county governments, even if the impacts will be regional as well
38as local and may impact the efforts by the state and regions in
39economic development areas.

P4    1(j) Currently, local governments that desire to perform due
2diligence for their constituents by performing an economic analysis
3are placed at a disadvantage because a neighboring city or county
4may not perform an economic analysis. This situation may result
5in the shifting of sales tax and destruction of the business
6community in a city or county that simply wants to study the
7impacts of the development project before making a final approval
8that the permitting of the superstore does not have a material
9adverse impact on the impact area.

10

SEC. 2.  

Section 65928.3 is added to the Government Code, to
11read:

12

65928.3.  

“Economic assistance areas” means existing economic
13development areas, that may be amended from time to time by the
14Legislature, including an enterprise zone established pursuant to
15Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 7070) of Division 7 of
16Title 1, a local agency military base recovery area established
17pursuant to Chapter 12.97 (commencing with Section 7105) of
18Division 7 of Title 1, a manufacturing incentive area designated
19pursuant to Section 7073.8, a targeted tax area designated pursuant
20to Section 7097, or any redevelopment area identified by any
21successorbegin delete orend delete agency to a former redevelopmentbegin delete agency, or
22recipients of over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of
23financial assistance as defined in this chapter.end delete
begin insert agency.end insert

24

SEC. 3.  

Section 65928.4 is added to the Government Code, to
25read:

26

65928.4.  

“Financial assistance” includes, but is not limited to,
27any of the following in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars
28($100,000) or greater:

29(a) Any appropriation of public funds, including, but not limited
30to, loans, grants, or subsidies or the payment for or construction
31of parking improvements.

32(b) Any tax incentive, including, but not limited to, tax
33exemptions, rebates, reductions, or moratoria of a tax, including
34any rebate or payment based upon the amount of sales tax generated
35from the superstore.

36(c) The sale or lease of real property at a cost that is less than
37fair market value.

38(d) Payment for, forgiveness of, or reduction of fees.

39

SEC. 4.  

Section 65928.7 is added to the Government Code, to
40read:

P5    1

65928.7.  

“Impact area” means a five-mile radius surrounding
2the proposed location of a superstore.

3

SEC. 5.  

Section 65935 is added to the Government Code, to
4read:

5

65935.  

“Superstore” means a business establishment that
6exceeds 90,000 square feet of gross floor area, sells a wide range
7of consumer goods, and devotes 10,000 square feet or more of the
8sales floor area to the sale of items that are exempted from the
9Sales and Use Tax Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001)
10of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code), pursuant to
11Section 6359 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. “Superstore”
12shall include a retail establishment with multiple tenants, and the
13cumulative sum of related or successive permits that may be part
14of a larger project, including piecemeal additions to a building,
15where consumer goods and nontaxable items are sold under the
16same roof with shared checkout stands, entrances, and exits.
17“Superstore” does not include a discount warehouse or retail store
18where more than one-half of the items carried by the discount
19warehouse or retail store are sold in large quantities or in bulk,
20and the discount warehouse or retail store requires shoppers to pay
21a membership or assessment fee.

22

SEC. 6.  

Section 65957.3 is added to the Government Code, to
23read:

24

65957.3.  

(a) Prior to the permitting of the construction of, the
25addition to, or the alteration of, any buildings or structuresbegin delete whichend delete
26begin insert that end insert would create a superstore in an economic assistance area,begin insert or
27where a superstore would be the recipient of over one hundred
28thousand dollars ($100,000) in financial assistance,end insert
in addition
29to the findings otherwise required by any ordinance or regulation
30of the city, county, or city and county, the legislative body of the
31city, county, or city and county shall make a finding that, based
32 on consideration of all economic benefits and costs, the superstore
33will not materially adversely affect the economic welfare of the
34impact area. This finding shall be based upon information contained
35in an economic impact report, any other information received or
36obtained by the designated agency of the city, county, or city and
37county, and any other information received before or at a public
38hearing conducted as required by this section.

39(b) The city, county, or city and county may prepare the
40economic impact report or contract with a private entity, other than
P6    1the permit applicant, or with another public agency for the
2preparation of the report. Any private entity or other public agency
3contracted to prepare the economic impact report shall be qualified
4by education, training, and experience to conduct economic and
5fiscal impact analyses.

6(c) The applicant for the proposed superstore shall pay the city,
7county, or city and county for the costs of preparing the economic
8impact report.

9(d) The economic impact report shall include, but is not limited
10to, all of the following:

11(1) An assessment of whether the proposed superstore will meet
12the purposes of any designated economic assistancebegin delete areas,
13including an enterprise zone, a local agency military base recovery
14area, a manufacturing enhancement area, a targeted tax area, or
15any plan area administered by a successor agency to a former
16redevelopment agency,end delete
begin insert areaend insert in which the superstore is proposed
17to be located.

18(2) An assessment of whether the proposed superstore will
19negatively impact any retailer that is the beneficiary of any benefits
20from any program adopted in connection with anybegin delete designated
21economic development area, including an enterprise zone, a local
22agency military base recovery area, a manufacturing enhancement
23area, a targeted tax area, or any program adopted by a successor
24agency to a former redevelopment agency,end delete
begin insert economic assistance
25areaend insert
in which the superstore is proposed to be located.

begin delete

26(3) An assessment of the extent to which the proposed superstore
27will capture a share of retail sales in the impact area.

28(4) An assessment of the extent to which the construction and
29operation of the proposed superstore will affect the supply and
30demand for retail space in the impact area.

end delete
begin delete

26 31(5)

end delete

32begin insert(3)end insert An assessment of the extent to which the construction and
33operation of the proposed superstore will affect employment in
34the impact area, including all of the following:

35(A) The number of persons employed in existing retail stores
36in the impact area.

37(B) An estimate of the number of people who will likely be
38employed by the proposed superstore.

39(C) An analysis of whether the proposed superstore will result
40in a net increase or decrease in employment in the impact area.

P7    1(D) The effect on wages and benefits of employees of other
2retail businesses, and community income levels in the impact area.

begin delete

37 3(6)

end delete

4begin insert(4)end insert A projection of the costs of public services and public
5facilities resulting from the construction and operation of the
6 proposed superstore and the incidence of those costs, including
7the cost to the state, city, or county of any public assistance that
8employees of the proposed superstore will be eligible for based
9on the wages and benefits to be paid by the proposed superstore.

begin delete

3 10(7)

end delete

11begin insert(5)end insert A projection of the public revenues resulting from the
12construction and operation of the proposed superstore retailer and
13the incidence of those revenues.

begin delete

6 14(8)

end delete

15begin insert(6)end insert An assessment of the effect that the construction and
16operation of the proposed superstore will have on retail operations,
17including grocery stores or retail shopping centers, in the impact
18area, including the potential for blight resulting from retail business
19closures and the nature of any businesses displaced.

begin delete

20(9) An assessment of the effect that the construction and
21operation of the proposed superstore will have on the ability of
22the city, county, or city and county to implement the goals
23contained in its general plan, including, but not limited to, local
24policies and standards that apply to land use patterns, traffic
25circulation, affordable housing, and natural resources, including
26water supplies, open-space lands, noise problems, and safety risks.

end delete
begin delete

27(10) An assessment of the effect that the construction and
28operation of the proposed superstore will have on average total
29vehicle miles traveled by retail customers in the same impact area.

end delete
begin delete

21 30(11)

end delete

31begin insert(7)end insert An assessment of the potential for long-term vacancy of the
32property on which the superstore is proposedbegin delete in the event thatend deletebegin insert if end insert
33 the business vacates thebegin delete premises, including any restrictions that
34exist on the subsequent use of the property on which the superstore
35is proposed to be located, including the provisions of any lease
36that, in the event the owner or operator of the proposed superstore
37vacates the premises, would require the premises to remain vacant
38for a significant amount of time.end delete
begin insert premises.end insert

begin delete

29 39(12)

end delete

P8    1begin insert(8)end insert An assessment of whether the superstore would require the
2demolition of housing or any other action or change that would
3result in a decrease or negative impact on the creation of extremely
4low, very low, low-, or moderate-income housing.

begin delete

5(13) An assessment of whether the superstore would result in
6the destruction or demolition of park or other green space,
7playgrounds, child care facilities, or community centers.

end delete
begin delete

36 8(14)

end delete

9begin insert(9)end insert An assessment of whether the superstore would result in
10any other adverse or positive economic impacts or blight in the
11impact area.

begin delete

P8   1 12(15)

end delete

13begin insert(10)end insert An assessment of whether any measures identified by the
14superstore are available that may mitigate any materially adverse
15economic impacts of the superstore.

16(e) At any regularly scheduled meeting or meetings of the
17legislative body of a city, county, or city and county, following
18the completion and approval of the economic impact report
19required by this section, and 30 days prior to the issuance of any
20entitlement, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a city,
21county, or city and county shall provide the opportunity for public
22comment on the economic impact report and its findings.

23(f) This section shall not preclude a city, county, or city and
24county from conducting additional studies of the effects of the
25construction and operation of a proposed superstore.

26(g) (1) The Legislature finds that the construction and operation
27of a superstore has land use, environmental, economic, fiscal, and
28social equity effects that extend beyond the boundaries of the city,
29county, or city and county in which it is located and may impact
30the goals and objectives of economic development areas, including
31enterprise zones, local agency military base recovery areas,
32manufacturing enhancement areas, targeted tax areas, and any plan
33area administered by a successor agency to a former redevelopment
34agency, and beyond the borders of the city, county, or city and
35county, where financial assistance is provided to a superstore.

36(2) The Legislature finds that it is essential for the statewide
37public health, safety, and welfare to require cities, counties, and
38cities and counties to understand the potential spillover effects of
39approving the construction and operation of superstores.

P9    1(3) The Legislature further finds and declares that the review
2and regulation of superstores is a matter of statewide concern and
3not merely a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section 5 of
4Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this section
5shall apply to charter cities and to charter cities and counties.

6

SEC. 7.  

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
7Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
8a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service
9charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or
10level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section
1117556 of the Government Code.



O

    97