AB 670, as amended, Atkins. Pharmacy Law: incentive payments.
The Pharmacy Law governs the practice of pharmacy in this state, including the permissible duties of licensed pharmacists. Among other permitted acts, a pharmacist filling a prescription order for a drug product prescribed by its trade or brand name may select another drug product with the same active chemical ingredients of the same strength, quantity, and dosage form, and of the same generic drug name as determined, as specified, of those drug products having the same active chemical ingredients. A person who violates the Pharmacy Law is guilty of a crime, as specified.
This bill would prohibit a pharmacist or pharmacy employer from receiving any payment or other compensation, in the form of money orbegin delete otherwise, that is used as an inducementend deletebegin insert
otherwiseend insert to specifically recommend or replacebegin delete anend deletebegin insert a patient’send insert originally prescribed drug product with a drug product that does not have the same active ingredient as the originally prescribed drug productbegin insert, unless the recommendation is the result of, and the payment is included in the reimbursement for, the pharmacist performing a comprehensive medication review, as specifiedend insert. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 4073.5 is added to the Business and
2Professions Code, to read:
(a) A pharmacist or pharmacy employer shall not
4receive any payment or other compensation, in the form of money
5orbegin delete otherwise, that is used as an inducement toend deletebegin insert otherwise, toend insert
6 specifically recommend or replacebegin delete anend deletebegin insert a patient’send insert originally
7prescribed drug product with a drug product that does not have
8the same active ingredient as the originally prescribed drugbegin delete product.end delete
9begin insert
product, unless the recommendation is the result of, and the
10payment is included in the reimbursement for, the pharmacist
11performing a comprehensive medication review, which includes
12a consultation with the patient.end insert
13(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit
14contracts that contain incentive plans that involve general payments
15for consultation services that are not directly tied to payments for
16recommending or replacing a specific drug product.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
18Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
19the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
20district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
21infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
22for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
23the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
24the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
25Constitution.
O
97