BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 678 (Gordon and Dickenson) - Health care districts: community  
          health needs assessment.
          
          Amended: April 15, 2013         Policy Vote: G&F 6-0, Health 9-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 30, 2013                           
          Consultant: Brendan McCarthy    
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 678 would require a health care district that  
          leases or transfer assets to a corporation to conduct an  
          assessment every five years of the community's health needs. 

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Potential mandate costs up to $200,000 per year. Currently,  
              there are fifteen health care districts that have leased or  
              transferred assets that would be impacted by this bill.  
              Assuming that those districts incur staff and consultant  
              costs up to the equivalent of one-half of a staff position  
              every five years, the total reimbursable mandate costs to  
              the state would be about $200,000 per year, on average.

              Minor expected costs to local agency formation commissions  
              to incorporate information from health care districts into  
              municipal service reviews.

          Background: Under current law, local health care districts may  
          be incorporated as local government agencies, typically to  
          operate a hospital. There are 73 health care districts in the  
          state of which 43 districts operate hospitals. Current law  
          allows a health care district to lease or transfer assets  
          (typically a hospital) to a corporation for operation, provided  
          that certain conditions are met. 

          To date, fifteen health care districts have leased or  
          transferred assets. Some of those districts have established  
          non-profit corporations and transferred assets to that  
          non-profit corporation, while other health care districts have  
          transferred assets (under a contract) to public or private  
          hospital systems.








          AB 678 (Gordon and Dickinson)
          Page 1



          Proposed Law: AB 678 would require health care districts that  
          lease or transfer assets to a corporation to conduct an  
          assessment every five years of the community's health needs. 

          Specific provisions of the bill would:
              Require a health care district that has leased or  
              transferred assets to conduct a community health needs  
              assessment, with specified procedural requirements;
              Commencing January 1, 2019, require the needs assessments  
              to address progress made in meeting community health needs;
              Require local agency formation commissions to include  
              information from the community needs assessment in currently  
              mandated municipal service reviews.

          Related Legislation: SB 804 (Corbett, Statutes of 2012) requires  
          health care districts that propose to transfer more than 50% of  
          the district's assets to assess the fair market value of those  
          assets.

          Staff Comments: Under the California Constitution, the state is  
          generally required to reimburse local government agencies for  
          the costs incurred to comply with a state mandate. The  
          Commission on State Mandates is responsible for assessing  
          whether a state law imposes a reimbursable mandate and the costs  
          that must be reimbursed by the state. As a general principal,  
          when the state authorizes (but does not require) a local agency  
          to take an action, any costs incurred by that local agency are  
          not reimbursable. This applies even if the state imposes certain  
          conditions on a local agency that elects to participate in the  
          program. However, if a local agency has decided to take  
          advantage of authority granted by the state and the state  
          subsequently imposes costly requirements on that local  
          government, the Commission may rule that the state has mandated  
          a new level of service - requiring state reimbursement.

          With regards to this bill, fifteen health care districts have  
          already decided to lease or transfer assets. This bill would  
          impose new obligations on those districts. It may not be  
          feasible or simple for those health care districts to undo those  
          leases or transfers if they do not wish to comply with the new  
          state-mandated requirements. The Commission may rule that this  
          bill imposes a new mandate and is liable to reimburse those  
          health care districts for their costs to comply with the bill.








          AB 678 (Gordon and Dickinson)
          Page 2