BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 687
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 687 (Roger Hernández)
          As Amended  May 24, 2013
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE              9-5                
          ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY           5-1
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bradford, Bonilla,        |Ayes:|Alejo, Bloom, Lowenthal,  |
          |     |Buchanan, Fong, Garcia,   |     |Stone, Ting               |
          |     |Roger Hernández, Rendon,  |     |                          |
          |     |Skinner, Williams         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Patterson, Chávez, Beth   |Nays:|Donnelly                  |
          |     |Gaines, Gorell, Jones     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APROPRIATIONS                  12-5                             
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |     |                          |
          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Hall,      |     |                          |
          |     |Ammiano, Pan, Quirk,      |     |                          |
          |     |Weber                     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Bigelow,          |     |                          |
          |     |Donnelly, Linder, Wagner  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Permits the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (PUC) to give priority direct electrical power purchase rights  
          to public entities cleaning up polluted Superfund groundwater.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)States PUC shall ensure that entities currently treating and  
            remediating groundwater that a federal, state, or local agency  
            previously identified as contaminated have the highest  
            priority in acquiring electric service by direct transactions  
            if either of the following apply:








                                                                  AB 687
                                                                  Page  2



             a)   The treatment or remediation is at a site that is listed  
               by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on the  
               National Priorities List.
                
             b)   The entity is a public drinking water system serving a  
               disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged community.

          2)Specifies that moneys saved as a result of the direct  
            transaction be used for activities related to treating or  
            remediating contaminated groundwater at the site.

          3)Requires the entity engaged in the direct transaction to  
            report PUC the total yearly savings resulting from the direct  
            transaction and the expenditure of those savings.  PUC may  
            include information in the Annual Report to the Legislature. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

             1)   Redirection of future direct access programs that were  
               on a first-come first-serve basis.

             2)   Increased administrative costs to PUC under $100,000 for  
               rulemaking.

           COMMENTS  :

           Background  :  Direct Access, first instituted in California in  
          1996, allows eligible
          customers to purchase electricity from a competitive provider,  
          an Electric Service Provider (ESP), instead of from a regulated  
          electric utility.  The utility delivers the electricity that the  
          customer purchases from ESP to the customer over its  
          distribution system. Thus, in 2001, in order to ensure the  
          predictable revenue stream necessary for long-term contracts  
          procured by Department of Water Resources (DWR) during the state  
          energy crisis, and to prevent additional migration away from the  
          three largest regulated utilities, the Legislature directed PUC  
          to suspend direct access power purchases.  Moreover, according  
          to PUC rules, certain customers remained eligible to secure  
          direct access power after the suspension date and to switch  
          between bundled service and direct access service.  









                                                                  AB 687
                                                                  Page  3


          Pursuant to SB 695 (Kehoe), Chapter 337, Statutes of 2009, the  
          direct access market opened to individual retail nonresidential  
          customers up to an annually capped level of service to be phased  
          in over a period of three to five years.  In March 2010, PUC  
          adopted a plan to increase available direct access power to  
          allow expansion of direct access service to this new group of  
          authorized customers within the service territories of  
          California's three largest regulated utilities.  The  
          authorization for direct access is being implemented by PUC  
          through a four-year annually capped phase-in schedule.  As of  
          April 2010, all qualifying nonresidential customers became  
          eligible to take direct access service, up to the specified  
          maximum annual caps, according to the following schedule of  
          direct access sales:

          1)35% in year two.

          2)20% in year three.

          3)10% in year four.

          After the four-year phase-in period, which ends in 2013, there  
          will be approximately 12.87% of total retail sales being served  
          by entities other than the regulated utilities.  SB 695 limits  
          any potential risk associated with reopening direct access to  
          this broader group of customers by eliminating uncertainty  
          associated with load migration.  The adopted phase-in schedule  
          is designed to provide enough lead time for the regulated  
          utilities to account for small shifts in load and thereby avoid  
          unwarranted cost shifting and stranded load.

          As of February 2013, the statewide direct access load is  
          approximately 12.39%.  This amount is largely represented by  
          commercial and industrial customers.  According to PUC, the  
          allowable direct access is subscribed, some of which may drop  
          off, while some might be slow in switching.

           Preferential treatment for environmental cleanup projects:    
          Cleaning up highly contaminated 
          Superfund sites require large, expensive pump-and-treat systems,  
          operating around the clock. According to the Department of Toxic  
          Substance Control, there are approximately 90 such sites in  
          California.  Proponents argue this bill will save ratepayer  
          funds and accelerates the remediation of contaminated  








                                                                  AB 687
                                                                  Page  4


          groundwater at USEPA Superfund sites.  Also, another benefit is  
          replenishing local groundwater supplies as required by  
          California Water Code.

          The ability to purchase direct access power has been on a  
          first-come, first-served basis.  The proposed legislation would  
          direct PUC to give priority purchase rights to public entities  
          operating qualified environmental cleanup projects to ensure  
          that they can purchase less expensive direct access power.   
          However, giving priority purchase rights to one entity over  
          another can be viewed as picking winners and losers for direct  
          access and this may open "Pandora's Box."  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    DaVina Flemings / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0000995