BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  1

       Date of Hearing:   April 9, 2013

          ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JOBS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE ECONOMY
                                 Jose Medina, Chair
              AB 701 (John A. Pérez) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2013
        
       SUBJECT  :   California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank 

        SUMMARY  :   Authorizes the California Infrastructure and Economic  
       Development Bank (I-Bank) to serve as the primary state agency for  
       applying to any federal infrastructure bank or financing authority.   
       Further, the bill expands the membership of the board of directors  
       from five to seven members and specifies that legislative members will  
       be nonvoting members.   

        EXISTING LAW:

        1)Establishes the I-Bank within the Business, Transportation and  
         Housing Agency (BTH), and authorizes it to undertake a variety of  
         infrastructure related financial activities including, but not  
         limited to, the administration of a revolving loan fund and the  
         issuance of tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds.

       2)Provides that the board of directors is comprised of five specified  
         people, defines a quorum at three people and specifies that an  
         affirmative vote of three people is required on any action taken by  
         the board.

       3)Specifies that the I-Bank board of directors shall consist of the  
         following:

          a)   The Director of Finance or designee;
          b)   The Treasurer or designee;
          c)   Secretary of Business, Transportation and Housing or designee;
          d)   Governor's appointee; and 
          e)   Secretary of State Consumer Services Agency or designee.

        FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown 

        COMMENTS  :    

        1)Author's Purpose  :  According to the author, "This bill is intended  
         to allow the Legislature to participate in critical decisions  
         affecting the I-Bank.  Given the I-Bank's integral role in issuing  
         tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds, providing financing to public  








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  2

         agencies, and leveraging State and Federal funds, it is important  
         that the Legislature have input on how those decisions are made. "

        2)Policy Question  :  This designates the I-Bank as the state's primary  
         liaison with the federal government on issues related to a national  
         infrastructure bank and adds legislative Members to the Board of  
         Directors in order to more closely link its activities to the  
         state's broader development activities.

         In advocating for the heightened participation of the state in  
         federal legislative and congressional activities, the author notes  
         the importance of finding new sources of capital for upgrading  
         California's infrastructure and the continuing interest in a  
         national bank model.  Additional information on the role of  
         infrastructure within the California economy, including the  
         significant defects and funding gaps are discussed below.

        3)Infrastructure and the California Economy  :  World class  
         infrastructure plays a key role in business attraction, as  
         multinational companies consistently rank the quality of  
         infrastructure among their top four criteria in making investment  
         decisions.  Research shows that as U.S. infrastructure has been in  
         decline, infrastructure in other countries is rapidly increasing.   
         The 2010-11 Global Competitiveness Report by the World Economic  
         Forum places U.S. infrastructure 23rd in the world, a drop from its  
         rank of 7th in 2000.  

         California's infrastructure is in a similar state, according to the  
         American Society of Civil Engineer's report, California  
         Infrastructure Report Card 2012, estimated a $65 billion a year  
         investment gap.  The impact of this lack of investment is compounded  
         by the substantial new investments made in other states and nations,  
         including the expansion of the Panama Canal. 

         Traditionally, innovation infrastructure has been based around the  
         idea of "Industry Clusters," areas where multiple firms and  
         organizations working in the same, or similar, fields can draw on  
         each other's discoveries, products, and in some cases workforces  
         leading to a highly focused and productive innovation center with  
         prodigious output.  Silicon Valley and Hollywood are archetypical  
         examples, specializing in electronics and cinema, respectively.

         However, as the world has globalized, transportation and  
         communication times and costs have shrunk.  A new global business  
         paradigm is emerging in which location is less relevant and  








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  3

         competitive advantage, based on the quality and efficiency of the  
         technologies that link the location with other areas of the world.

        4)National Infrastructure Bank  :  Spending on infrastructure by the  
         federal government has been declining.  According to the  
         Congressional Budget Office, spending on transportation and water  
         infrastructure as a share of U.S. GDP was 3.1% in 1959 and was only  
         2.4% in 2007.  

         The National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing  
         Commission estimates that there is a highway and transit funding gap  
         of $2.3 trillion.  The federal Environmental Protection Agency  
         similarly finds there is great need to repair and upgrade water  
         systems including a 2009-19 funding gap of $122 billion for clean  
         water and $102 billion for drinking water.  Not surprising, there  
         has been a national call for renewed infrastructure investment to  
         support manufacturing, goods movement, energy production, and  
         broadband deployment, among other economic and community development  
         purposes.  


         A National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank was first proposed by  
         Senators Christopher Dodd and Chuck Hagel in 2007.  President Barack  
         Obama supported the legislation in 2008 and again in 2010.  More  
         recently, in his 2013 State of the Union, President Obama emphasized  
         the importance on fixing the nation's infrastructure as part of his  
         "Plan for a Strong Middle Class and A Strong America" and proposed  
         both a $50 billion "Fix it First" program from peace dividends and a  
         "Partnership to Rebuild America" initiative, which would use public  
         policies to attract private investment in upgrading America's  
         infrastructure.


         Models for a national infrastructure bank have varied and the state  
         I-Bank has been asked to Washington D.C. several times to discuss  
         differing models.  In one instance, the federal government would use  
         $60 billion in seed money over 10 years with an expected return of  
         $500 billion in private investment.  Given the significance of  
         quality infrastructure within every state's global competitiveness,  
         it would seem that engaging in the development of the national  
         program would be within the state's interest.  AB 701 would  
         specifically designate the state I-Bank as the primary state agency  
         for applying to the federal infrastructure bank.










                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  4

        5)Background on I-Bank  :  The I-Bank was established in 1994 to promote  
         economic revitalization, enable future development, and encourage a  
         healthy climate for jobs in California.  Housed within BTH, it is  
         governed by a five-member board of directors comprised of the BTH  
         Secretary (chair), State Treasurer, Director Department of Finance,  
         Secretary of the State and Consumer Services Agency, and a  
         Governor's appointee.  The day-to-day operations of the I-Bank are  
         directed by the Executive Director who is an appointee of the  
         Governor and is subject to confirmation by the California State  
         Senate.  Currently, the I-Bank has authority for 24 staff members.

         The I-Bank does not receive any ongoing General Fund support, rather  
         it is financed through fees, interest income and other revenues  
         derived from its public and private sector financing activities.   
         According to its 2009-10 independent audit, its programs continue to  
         provide sufficient revenues to support all operating expenses.  

         The I-Bank administers two categories of programs:  1) the  
         Infrastructure State Revolving Fund which provides direct low-cost  
         financing to public agencies for a variety of public infrastructure  
         projects; and, 2) Bond Financed Programs which provide financing for  
         manufacturing companies, nonprofit organizations, public agencies  
         and other eligible entities.  There is no commitment of I-Bank or  
         state funds for any of the conduit revenue bonds.  Even in the case  
         of default, the state is not liable.
        
         Since its creation in 1994, the I-Bank has loaned over $400 million  
         to local agencies, developing a high-level of expertise in the  
         financing of public infrastructure.  The I-Bank also serves as the  
         state's only general purpose financing authority with broad  
         statutory powers to issue revenue bonds.  Over $30 billion in  
         conduit revenue bonds have been issued by the I-Bank since 2000.  

         The seismic upgrade of the Bay Bridge is an example of how conduit  
         revenue bonds can be used to raise capital for infrastructure  
         projects without impacting the state General Fund.  In this example,  
         the repayment of the bonds was based on a $1 per vehicle surcharge  
         collected on seven Bay Area state-owned toll bridges.  In addition  
         to this type of bonding activity, the I-Bank has also been involved  
         in other unique financings including Tobacco Securitization Bonds,  
         Tribal Compact Asset Securitization Bonds, and Imperial Irrigation  
         District Preliminary Loan Guarantees.

        6)Board Structure  :  The I-Bank's board of directors is currently  
         comprised of five members, four of which are state public officials.  








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  5

          Each of the public officials either has specific program-related  
         expertise or has access to experts within their respected  
         departments or agencies.
        
          Under existing law, the Governor has the authority to appoint one  
         public member to the board.  This public member is not required to  
         have any particular skill set or represent a particular stakeholder  
         group other than the public-at-large.  Chart 2 - Board Structures  
         from Selected Economic and Workforce Development entities details,  
         that there is no consistent board appointment structure.






          ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |  Chart 2 - Board Structures from Selected Economic and Workforce  |
         |                       Development Entities                        |
          ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |--------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----------------------------------|
         |        |Total|Gov  |Speake|Senat|         Other Information         |
         |        |     |Appts|r     |e    |                                   |
         |        |Mem-b|     |Appts |Rules|                                   |
         |        |ers  |     |      |     |                                   |
         |        |     |     |      |Appts|                                   |
         |        |     |     |      |     |                                   |
         |--------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----------------------------------|
         |Waste   |     |     |      |     |Four Public Members:  Four members |
         |Manage-m|  6  |  4  |  1   | 1   |are appointed by the Governor, two |
         |ent     |     |     |      |     |of whom represent the public, one  |
         |Board   |     |     |      |     |member with industry expertise,    |
         |and the |     |     |      |     |and one with expertise in the      |
         |Recyclin|     |     |      |     |environmental field. One member is |
         |g       |     |     |      |     |appointed by the Senate Committee  |
         |Market  |     |     |      |     |on Rules and one is appointed by   |
         |Develop-|     |     |      |     |the Speaker of the Assembly to     |
         |ment    |     |     |      |     |represent the public.  Reference:  |
         |Zones   |     |     |      |     |PRC 404001                         |
         |--------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----------------------------------|
         |Employ-m|     |     |      |     |One Public Member:  The Speaker    |
         |ent     |  7  |  3  |  2   |  2  |and President pro Tempore each     |
         |Training|     |     |      |     |appoint two members, one being a   |
         | Panel  |     |     |      |     |private sector labor               |
         |        |     |     |      |     |representative and the other being |








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  6

         |        |     |     |      |     |a business representative.   Gov.  |
         |        |     |     |      |     |appoints three members, one being  |
         |        |     |     |      |     |a private sector labor             |
         |        |     |     |      |     |representative, one being a        |
         |        |     |     |      |     |business representative, and one   |
         |        |     |     |      |     |public member.                     |
         |        |     |     |      |     |Reference: UIC 10202.5             |
         |--------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----------------------------------|
         |Workforc|     |     |      |     |There is no statutory limit on the |
         |e       | No  | No  | 2    | 2   |number of people who may serve on  |
         |Investme|limit|limit|      |     |the board.  A majority of Gov      |
         |nt      |     |     |      |     |appointments are from business,    |
         |Board   |     |     |      |     |including small business.  At      |
         |        |     |     |      |     |least 15% of the Gov. appointments |
         |        |     |     |      |     |shall be from labor organizations  |
         |        |     |     |      |     |nominated by state labor           |
         |        |     |     |      |     |federations.  In addition to these |
         |        |     |     |      |     |appointments the Gov. may place an |
         |        |     |     |      |     |unlimited number of state          |
         |        |     |     |      |     |officials and state government     |
         |        |     |     |      |     |representatives.                   |
         |        |     |     |      |     |Legislature appoints two public    |
         |        |     |     |      |     |members each.  Reference:  UIC     |
         |        |     |     |      |     |14012                              |
         |--------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----------------------------------|
         |Californ|     |     |      |     |Two public members:  Secretary of  |
         |ia      | 11  |  7  |  2   |  2  |BTH serves as chair.  Gov.         |
         |Small   |     |     |      |     |appoints six members from small    |
         |Business|     |     |      |     |business community.  Between the   |
         | Board  |     |     |      |     |Assembly and the Senate one        |
         |        |     |     |      |     |business and one agricultural      |
         |        |     |     |      |     |representative is appointed.       |
         |        |     |     |      |     |Plus, one Assembly Member and one  |
         |        |     |     |      |     |Senator to serve on the board.     |
         |        |     |     |      |     |Reference:  Corp 14021             |
          --------------------------------------------------------------------- 

        7)2011 JEDE Oversight Hearing  :  In March 2011, the Assembly Economic  
         Development Committee (JEDE) held the first of several oversight  
         hearings on how infrastructure development impacted local, state and  
         federal economic recovery efforts and California's economic position  
         in post-recession economy.  From these hearings, JEDE released a  
         preliminary list of recommendations and proposed amendments to  
         better align the authorities of the I-Bank with the state's current  
         and future infrastructure needs.  The resulting I-Bank package  








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  7

         included AB 700 (Blumenfield) to reorganize the I-Bank as an  
         independent agency; AB 696 (Hueso) to enhance the I-Bank's ability  
         to develop financing methods best suited for the post-recession  
         economy; and, AB 893 (V. Manuel Pérez) and AB 1094 (John A. Pérez)  
         to expand the membership of the board and allow the I-Bank to  
         function more broadly as a development and business creation entity.  
          None of these measures were ultimately enacted, however in vetoing  
         AB 700, the Governor stated his intent to reorganize the I-Bank.  AB  
         701 is substantively a reintroduction of AB 1094 from 2011.  With  
         the reorganization agreed to (discussed below), it seems appropriate  
         for the other policy recommendations to be brought forward again.

        8)Reorganization  :  In March 2012, the Governor initiated a  
         reorganization process to realign the state's administrative  
         structure.  Key changes were proposed and agreed to by the  
         Legislature including the dismantling of the Business,  
         Transportation and Housing Agency (BTH) and the shifting of a number  
         of key programs and services to GO-Biz including the I-Bank.  In  
         addition, the Secretary of BTH is replaced by the Director of GO-Biz  
         as Chair of I-Bank and the newly established Secretary of  
         Transportation replaces the Secretary of State and Consumer Services  
         on the I-Bank board.

         Programmatic approval of the reorganization was granted in July 2012  
         and will become effective July 2013.  The necessary statutory  
         changes are being made in AB 1317, which recently passed the  
         Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review and  
         is pending in Assembly Appropriations.

        9)Related legislation  :  Below is a list of related legislation from  
         current and previous legislative sessions:

           a)   AB 311 (V. Manuel Perez) Bi-National Infrastructure and  
            Economic Development Bank  : This bill expands the role of the  
            I-Bank to include facilitating infrastructure and economic  
            development financing activities within the California and Mexico  
            border region.  Status:  Scheduled to be heard in the Assembly  
            Committee on Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy on April  
            9, 2013.
           b)   AB 1094 (John A. Pérez) Board Membership of the California  
            Infrastructure Bank  :  This bill, as it was heard by JEDE, would  
            have added a member of the Assembly and a member of the Senate as  
            advisory members to the board of administration of the California  
            Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank.  Amendments were  
            taken to remove the Bank provisions and the bill was related to a  








                                                               AB 701
                                                               Page  8

            different topic and a different author at the time the bill was  
            pulled into the Senate Committee on Rules.  Status: Held in the  
            Senate Committee on Rules in 2012.

           c)   AB 1272 (Medina) Infrastructure Consortiums  :  This bill  
            authorizes the California Infrastructure and Economic Development  
            Bank (I-Bank) to formally participate in regional, national and  
            international organizations related to infrastructure financing.   
            Status:  Scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Committee on Jobs,  
            Economic Development and the Economy on April 9, 2013.

           d)   AB 1380 (Bass) California Infrastructure and Economic  
            Development Bank: Board of Directors  :  This bill would have  
            expanded the membership of the board of directors of the I-Bank  
            from five to seven members.  Status:  Held in the Senate Rules  
            Committee in 2010.  

        REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

        Support 
        
       None received 

        Opposition 
        
       None received 
        

       Analysis Prepared by  :    Toni Symonds  / J., E.D. & E. / (916)  
       319-2090