BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 723 (Quirk) - Postrelease supervision: petitions for release  
          pending revocation hearing.
          
          Amended: July 2, 2013           Policy Vote: Public Safety 6-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 30, 2013                           
          Consultant: Jolie Onodera       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 723 would authorize an individual on  
          postrelease community supervision (PRCS) who has been arrested  
          and held in custody pending a hearing on a revocation petition  
          filed against him or her to move the court for release on bail  
          or release on his or her own recognizance (OR), as specified.

          Fiscal Impact: 
           Potential ongoing annual costs of approximately $345,000  
            (General Fund) to the courts to the extent 50 percent of  
            statewide petitions to revoke PRCS apply for release on bail  
            or OR pending a revocation hearing. This estimate assumes  
            5,520 petitions to revoke PRCS per year and an additional 15  
            minutes per bail hearing for defendants who otherwise could  
            not have applied for bail under existing law.
           Potential cost savings to local jails of the same amount of  
            $345,000 (Local) assuming 25 percent of those defendants who  
            petition are granted bail by the courts and avoid 5 days of  
            incarceration in county jail. Estimate assumes a daily jail  
            rate of $100 per day.

          Background: Pursuant to Public Safety Realignment 2011,  
          effective October 1, 2011, existing law provides that specified  
          classes of offenders including those released after serving a  
          term for a serious or violent felony or a life term under the  
          Three-Strikes Law, high risk sex offenders, mentally-disordered  
          offenders, and specified sex offender registrants are subject to  
          parole under the supervision of the Department of Corrections  
          and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Offenders not subject to parole are  
          to be released from custody on PRCS and are subject to up to  
          three years of local supervision.









          AB 723 (Quirk)
          Page 1


          Existing law provides for intermediate and appropriate  
          sanctions, including "flash incarceration" for up to ten days,  
          for violations of the terms of PRCS. Upon a supervising county  
          agency's determination through an assessment process that  
          intermediate sanctions are not appropriate, the agency is  
          required to file a petition to revoke, modify, or terminate  
          PRCS. Under existing law, the supervising PRCS agency has the  
          authority to require the defendant to be held in custody pending  
          the revocation hearing. The decision to hold the defendant is to  
          be based on a determination that the defendant poses an  
          unreasonable risk to public safety, the defendant may fail to  
          appear at the hearing if released, or for any other reason in  
          the interests of justice. If PRCS is revoked, modified, or  
          terminated, the hearing officer can impose a county-jail  
          sentence of up to 180 days, but the offender may not be returned  
          to state prison.

          Under the recently enacted public safety realignment trailer  
          bill, SB 1023 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review) Chapter  
          43/2012, the existing probation revocation procedures under  
          Penal Code section 1203.2 are also applied to revocations of  
          mandatory supervision, PRCS, and beginning, July 1, 2013,  
          parole, in order to establish uniformity to relieve the courts  
          of the burdens associated with implementing separate procedures  
          for each category of supervision.

          Proposed Law: This bill would provide that a person subject to  
          PRCS who has had a revocation petition filed against him or her  
          by the county agency responsible for PRCS may file an  
          application for bail or release on OR with the superior court.

          This bill would provide that admittance to bail or OR release  
          pending revocation of PRCS is a matter within the sole  
          discretion of the court. Additionally, any bail or OR  
          application made shall be governed by the existing procedures  
          set forth in existing law.

          Prior Legislation: AB 1913 (Skinner) 2012 was substantially  
          similar to this measure and was held on the Suspense File of  
          this committee.
          
          SB 1023 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review) Chapter 43/2012,  
          the Public Safety Realignment trailer bill, among other  
          provisions, applies probation revocation procedures under Penal  








          AB 723 (Quirk)
          Page 2


          Code section 1203.2 to revocations of mandatory supervision,  
          PRCS, and beginning, July 1, 2013, parole.

          Staff Comments: By authorizing persons supervised under PRCS to  
          apply for release on bail or release on one's OR, the provisions  
          of this bill could result in increased administrative costs to  
          the courts for consideration of bail and OR applications filed  
          by persons pending revocation of PRCS.

          Information from the Judicial Council indicates approximately  
          2,300 petitions to revoke PRCS were filed with the courts  
          statewide between October 1, 2011, and February 29, 2012.  
          Assuming the rate of filing remains constant, approximately  
          5,520 petitions would be filed annually statewide. It is unknown  
          with certainly what percentage of cases would result in a court  
          hearing, but it is assumed that the hearing would be available  
          to the petitioner as a matter of right under the provisions of  
          the bill. Assuming 50 percent of petitions filed annually result  
          in court hearings would result in increased court costs of  
          $345,000 (General Fund) per year. This estimate assumes 15  
          minutes per bail hearing and an eight-hour court day cost of  
          $4,000 (or $125 per 15 minutes).

          Assuming 25 percent of the applications for bail (25 percent of  
          the 2,760 petitions, or 690 petitions) resulted in the courts  
          granting bail, county jails could experience local jail savings  
          of approximately $345,000 based on averting 5 days of  
          incarceration in county jail at an average daily jail rate of  
          $100 per day.