BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 755
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 1, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 755 (Ammiano) - As Introduced: February 21, 2013
Policy Committee:
TransportationVote:14-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill requires, for construction or reconstruction of a
bridge to be eligible for federal or state highway funds or toll
bridge revenues, that the planning process for the project take
into account the need for a suicide barrier.
FISCAL EFFECT
Costs to Caltrans and local agencies to bring this additional
consideration into the planning process of all bridge projects
should be absorbable.
Few bridges are likely to be candidates for a suicide barrier,
but additional planning, design and construction costs would be
significant for those determined to be in need of this feature.
Incorporating this feature, where needed, into the original
project may avoid a more costly retrofit in the future, however.
COMMENTS
1)Background and Purpose . The author has introduced AB 755 to
increase the consideration for suicide barriers on the state's
bridges. His office reports that this bill is as a result of
the author's work to secure a suicide barrier on the Golden
Gate Bridge. In 2008, directors of the Golden Gate Bridge
Highway and Transportation District voted to install a suicide
barrier on the bridge. The planned barrier will be a
stainless-steel net system that will make it nearly impossible
for someone to commit suicide by jumping from the bridge. The
barrier is estimated to cost $40 million to $50 million.
AB 755
Page 2
This bill is not intended to impose a specific planning
process on Caltrans or local transportation agencies. By
requiring "consideration" for suicide barriers in the planning
stages of a bridge project, project designers should have
greater opportunities to incorporate suicide barriers in
earlier design stages, potentially reducing overall costs for
those barriers deemed necessary.
2)Suggested Amendments . The author should clarify (a) at what
stage of the project planning process the new consideration
should be incorporated and (b) that this requirement does not
apply to current bridge projects-already expending state and
federal funds--whose planning is beyond that stage.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081