BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 759
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 15, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 759 (Daly) - As Amended: May 6, 2013
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 13 - 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill revises all references to private patrol operators
(PPOs) in state law to instead refer to private security
contractors (PSCs); specifies what a security guard's
distinctive uniform may include; revises the requirements for a
qualifying manager to a private security contractor; and makes
other technical changes.
FISCAL EFFECT
Costs associated with this legislation should be minor and
absorbable within existing resources.
COMMENTS
Purpose . This bill would enact multiple changes to modernize
state law relating to private patrol operators. Those updates
include clarifying what a distinctive uniform may include;
changing all code references to a PPO to instead refer to a PSC;
posting licenses on the Internet; adding the Internet and social
websites to existing advertising requirements; and specifying
eligibility requirements for the qualifying managers of PSCs
that demonstrate substantial security guard experience in
managing a PSC. This bill is sponsored by the California
Association of Licensed Security Agencies, Guards & Associates
(CALSAGA).
The author notes that under current law, the definition of a
distinctive uniform is lacking and poses a challenge with
regards to enforcement of provisions. Consequently, without a
distinctive uniform for PSCs, unlicensed, unregulated
AB 759
Page 2
individuals who may not pass the required background check,
perform tasks which are specifically assigned to licensed
security guards. The author contends that this lack of
definition of a distinct uniform for easy identification of
security guards poses a direct danger to the public.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081