AB 763,
as amended, Buchanan. Aquatic invasivebegin delete plants and other aquatic pestend delete plants: control and eradication.
Existing law designates the Department of Boating and Waterways as the lead agency of the state for the purpose of cooperating with agencies of the United States and other public agencies in controlling certain invasive plants in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the marsh, and authorizes the department to furnish money, services, equipment, and other property for the control of those invasive plants.
This bill would additionally designate the department as the lead agency of the state for the purpose of cooperating with otherbegin delete state and local public agencies and with agencies of the United Statesend deletebegin insert state, local, and federal agenciesend insert in
identifying, detecting, controlling, and administering programs to managebegin delete and, when feasible, eradicateend delete invasive aquatic plantsbegin delete and other aquatic pest plantsend delete, as defined, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh. The bill would authorize the department, in consultation with appropriate state, local, and federal agencies, andbegin delete after theend deletebegin insert upon concurrence from theend insert Department of Fish and Wildlifebegin delete concurs uponend deletebegin insert following theend insert completion of a
specified assessment described in the bill, to take such action it determines is necessary to implement control and, when feasible, eradication measures for those invasive aquaticbegin delete plants and other aquatic pestend delete plants.
This bill would require the department to regularly consult with the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the University of California, and other members of the scientific and research communities, and other state agencies withbegin delete jurisdictionend deletebegin insert authorityend insert over the control of invasive aquaticbegin delete plants and aquatic pestend delete
plants, to determine which species of those plants should be given the highest priority forbegin delete treatment,end deletebegin insert management and toend insert determine the bestbegin delete control measures, and
determine any feasible eradicationend deletebegin insert control, and when feasible, eradicationend insert measures. The bill would also require the department, after consulting with those entities, if it identifies a species of invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete that may need to be controlledbegin insert or eradicatedend insert, to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife of the potential threat from that invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plant speciesend delete.
The bill would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife, after receipt of that notice, in consultation with other appropriate local, state, and federal
agencies, to conduct a risk assessment of that invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete species to determine whether the plant species presents a threat to thebegin delete environment or economyend deletebegin insert environment, economy, or human healthend insert, as determined after consideration of specified factors. The bill would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife, after completing that assessment, to report its findings to the department so that the department may take any necessary action to control and, when feasible, eradicate an invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete, as authorized under the bill. The bill would also define thebegin delete terms,end deletebegin insert
termend insert “invasive aquaticbegin delete plant,” “invasive species,” and “aquatic pest plant,”end deletebegin insert plantend insertbegin insert”end insert for purposes of the Fish and Game Code.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) The spread of invasive aquatic plantsbegin delete and other aquatic pest begin insert isend insert a continuing problem in the Sacramento-San
4plants has beenend delete
5Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh.
6(b) Invasive aquatic plantsbegin delete and other aquatic pest plants can begin insert
impact the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its
7obstruct navigation and pose a threat to fisheries and other
8ecosystems in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries,
9and the marshend delete
10tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh by creating navigational
11obstructions and hazards for boats and other watercraft; impairing
12recreational activities such as swimming, fishing, and hunting;
13damaging water supply infrastructure and flood protection systems;
14altering water quality; and degrading the physical and chemical
15characteristics of fish and wildlife habitatend insert.
16(c) Coordinated, early-stagebegin delete treatmentend deletebegin insert response to introductionsend insert
17 of invasive aquatic plants begin deleteand other
aquatic pest plants end delete
18begin delete in controllingend deletebegin insert to long-term controlend insert andbegin delete managingend deletebegin insert management ofend insert
19 those invasive species to protect the state’sbegin delete environment and
20prevent harm to California’s tourism business and economyend delete
21begin insert environment, economy, and human health from harmful impacts
22of those invasive speciesend insert.
23(d) Authorizing the Department of Boating
and Waterways to
24cooperate with other state, federal, and local agencies in the
25identification and management of invasive aquatic plantsbegin delete and other begin insert in-lieuend insert of requiring that the department
26aquatic pest plants, insteadend delete
27undertake legislative action each timebegin delete an agency identifiesend delete a new
28species of invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend deletebegin insert is
29identifiedend insert, would enable the state tobegin delete more effectivelyend delete manage and
30
control invasive aquatic plantsbegin delete and other aquatic pest plantsend delete in the
31Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,begin delete andend delete its tributaries, and the Suisun
32Marshbegin insert in a more cost-efficient and effective manner thanend insertbegin insert is
33currentlyend insertbegin insert implementedend insert.begin delete Management actions should include the
34control and maintenance of nonproblematic conditions, and
35
eradication where feasible and cost-effective.end delete
Section 17.5 is added to the Fish and Game Code, to
37read:
“Aquatic pest plant” means a plant or alga that is native
2to California that can cause environmental harm.
Section 48.5 is added to the Fish and Game Code, to
5read:
begin delete(a)end deletebegin delete end delete“Invasive aquatic plant” means an aquatic plant or
7begin delete alga that is introduced into the state waters and is determined to begin insert alga, including its seeds, fragments, and
8be an invasive speciesend delete
9other biological materials capable of propagating that plant or
10alga, that is usually not native to an area, and whose establishment
11and spread causes or is likely to cause harm to native species and
12their habitat; the economy, including the viability of commercial,
13agricultural,
aquacultural, or recreational activities; and human
14health. Aquatic plants shall be determined to be invasiveend insert through
15the risk assessment required to be completed by the departmentbegin insert in
16consultation with the Department of Boating and Waterways and
17other state, local, and federal agenciesend insert pursuant to subdivision (c)
18of Section 64.5 of the Harbors and Navigation Codebegin delete to be an .
19invasive species, as defined in subdivision (b)end delete
20(b) “Invasive species” means an organism that has been
21introduced into the state through human activity and that is
22injurious, or likely to cause injury,
to the state’s environment or
23economy.
Section 64.5 is added to the Harbors and Navigation
26Code, to read:
(a) The department is designated as the lead agency of
28the state for the purpose of cooperating with otherbegin delete state and local begin insert state, local,end insert andbegin insert federalend insert agencies
29public agencies,end deletebegin delete of the United in identifying, detecting, controlling, and administering
30Statesend delete
31programs to managebegin delete and, when feasible, eradicateend delete invasive
aquatic
32plantsbegin delete and other aquatic pest plantsend delete in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
33Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh. The department, in
34consultation with appropriate state, local, and federal agencies,
35may take such action it determines is necessary,begin delete after theend deletebegin insert upon
36concurrence from theend insert Department of Fish and Wildlifebegin delete concurs begin insert following theend insert completion of the risk assessment described in
37uponend delete
38subdivision (c), to implement control and, when feasible,
39eradication measures for invasive
aquatic plantsbegin delete and other aquatic . Any actions taken to control invasive aquatic plants
40pest plantsend delete
P5 1begin delete or aquatic pest plantsend delete shall be in compliance with all applicable
2laws and regulations and conducted in an environmentally sound
3manner.
4(b) The department shall regularly consult with the United States
5Department of Agriculture, the United States Fish and Wildlife
6Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
7the University of California, and other members of the scientific
8and research communities, as well as other state agencies with
9begin delete jurisdictionend deletebegin insert
authorityend insert over the control of invasive aquatic plants
10begin delete and other aquatic pest plantsend delete to determine which species of those
11plants should be given the highest priority forbegin delete treatment,end delete
12begin insert management andend insert determine the best controlbegin delete measures, and begin insert and, when feasible, eradication end insert
13determine any feasible eradicationend delete
14 measures.
15(c) (1) After consulting with the various entities as required in
16subdivision
(b), if the department identifies a species of invasive
17aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete that may need to be
18
controlledbegin insert or eradicatedend insert,begin delete itend deletebegin insert the departmentend insert shall notify the
19Department of Fish and Wildlife of the potential threat from that
20plant species. After receipt of that notice, the Department of Fish
21and Wildlife, in consultation with other appropriate local, state,
22and federal agencies, including, but not limited to, the Department
23of Food and Agriculture, the Department of Water Resources, the
24State Water Resources Control Board, the Department of Pesticide
25Regulation, and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
26Assessment, shall conduct a risk assessment of the invasive aquatic
27plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend deletespecies
identified by the department
28to determine whether the plant species presents a threat to the
29begin delete environment or economyend deletebegin insert environment, economy, or human healthend insert.
30In making that determination, the department shall take prompt
31action to minimize detrimental impacts and costs of management,
32and shall consider all of the following:
33(A) Whether the invasive aquatic plant speciesbegin delete or other aquatic may cause environmental damage, including threats to
34pest plantend delete
35the health and stability of fisheries,begin delete damage to migratory and otherend delete
36begin insert
impairment to end insert birds’ access to waterways and nestingbegin insert, roosting,
37and foragingend insert areas, deterioration of water quality resulting from
38plant decay, and harm to native plants.
39(B) Whether the invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest species may cause harm to the state’s economy, infrastructure,
40plantend delete
P6 1or manmade facilities such as state water storage facilities and
2pumping operations, by increasing flood risk, threatening water
3supplies by blocking pumps, canals, and dams necessitating early
4control efforts.
5(C) Whether the invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest
species may obstruct navigation and recreational uses of
6plantend delete
7waterways.
8(2) Based on factors specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and
9(C) of paragraph (1) and any otherbegin delete environmental or economicend delete
10begin insert environmental, economic, or human health end insert impacts, the risk
11assessment shall specify whether the plant species under
12consideration has been determined to be an invasive aquatic plant
13begin delete or other aquatic pest plant, or neither of those types of plantsend delete.
14Findings from the risk assessment shall be documented in a way
15thatbegin delete makes clearend deletebegin insert
clearly describesend insert the severity and types of impacts
16caused by a plant species determined to be an invasive aquatic
17plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete.
18(3) After completing the risk assessment required by paragraph
19(1), the Department of Fish and Wildlife shall report its findings
20to the department so that the department may take any necessary
21action tobegin delete control, andend deletebegin insert control and,end insert when feasible, eradicate an
22invasive aquatic plantbegin delete or other aquatic pest plantend delete, as authorized
23under subdivision (a).
24(d) begin delete(1)end deletebegin delete end deleteFor purposes of this section, “invasive aquatic plant”
25means an aquatic plant orbegin delete alga that is introduced into the state begin insert alga, including its seeds, fragments, and other
26waters and is determined through the risk assessment completed
27pursuant to subdivision (c) to be an invasive species, as defined
28in paragraph (2)end delete
29biological materials capable of propagating that plant or alga,
30that end insertbegin insertis usually not native to an area, and whose
establishment and
31spread causes or is likely to cause harm to native species and their
32habitat; the economy, including the viability of commercial,
33agricultural, aquacultural, or recreational activities; and human
34healthend insert.begin insert Aquatic plants shall be determined to be invasive through
35the risk assessment required to be completed by the Department
36of Fish and Wildlife in consultation with the Department of Boating
37and Waterways and other state, local, and federal agencies
38pursuant to subdivision (c).end insert
39(2) For purposes of this section, “invasive species” means an
40organism that has been introduced into the state through human
P7 1activity and that is injurious, or likely to
cause injury, to the state’s
2environment or economy.
3(3) For the purposes of this section, an “aquatic pest plant”
4means a plant or alga that is native to California that can cause
5environmental harm.
6(e) This section does not require the department to attempt
7eradication ofbegin delete any of the plants specified in Section 64end deletebegin insert water
8hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) or Brazilian elodea (Egeria
9densa)end insert.begin insert Eradication of South American spongeplant (Limnobium
10laevigatum) populations
shall be attempted when detected to the
11extent feasible.end insert
O
96