Amended in Senate July 2, 2013

Amended in Senate June 17, 2013

Amended in Assembly May 29, 2013

Amended in Assembly April 10, 2013

Amended in Assembly March 18, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 763


Introduced by Assembly Member Buchanan

February 21, 2013


An act to add Section 48.5 to the Fish and Game Code, and to add Section 64.5 to the Harbors and Navigation Code, relating to aquatic invasive plants.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 763, as amended, Buchanan. Aquatic invasive plants: control and eradication.

Existing law designates the Department of Boating and Waterways as the lead agency of the state for the purpose of cooperating with agencies of the United States and other public agencies in controlling certain invasive plants in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the marsh, and authorizes the department to furnish money, services, equipment, and other property for the control of those invasive plants.

This bill would additionally designate the department as the lead agency of the state for the purpose of cooperating with other state, local, and federal agencies in identifying, detecting, controlling, and administering programs to manage invasive aquatic plants, as defined, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh. The bill would authorize the department, in consultation with appropriate state, local, and federal agencies, and upon concurrence from the Department of Fish and Wildlife following the completion of a specified assessment described in the bill, to take such action it determines is necessary to implement control and, when feasible, eradication measures for those invasive aquatic plants.

This bill would require the department to regularly consult with the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the University of California, and other members of the scientific and research communities, and other state agencies with authority over the control of invasive aquatic plants, to determine which species of those plants should be given the highest priority for management and to determine the best control, and, when feasible, eradication measures. The bill would also require the department, after consulting with those entities, if it identifies a species ofbegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant that may need to be controlled or eradicated, to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife of the potential threat from thatbegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant.

The bill would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife, after receipt of that notice, in consultation with other appropriate local, state, and federal agencies, to conduct a risk assessment of thatbegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant species to determine whether the plant species presents a threat to the environment, economy, or human health, as determined after consideration of specified factors.begin insert The bill would require the risk assessment to specify whether the aquatic plant under consideration has been determined to be an invasive aquatic plant.end insert The bill would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife,begin insert within 30 daysend insert after completing that assessment, to report its findings to the department so that the department may take any necessary action to control and, when feasible, eradicate an invasive aquatic plant, as authorized under the bill. The bill would also define the term “invasive aquatic plant” for purposes of the Fish and Game Code.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) The spread of invasive aquatic plants is a continuing problem
4in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun
5Marsh.

6(b) Invasive aquatic plants impact the Sacramento-San Joaquin
7Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun Marsh by creating navigational
8obstructions and hazards for boats and other watercraft; impairing
9recreational activities such as swimming, fishing, and hunting;
10damaging water supply infrastructure and flood protection systems;
11altering water quality; and degrading the physical and chemical
12characteristics of fish and wildlife habitat.

13(c) Coordinated, early-stage response to introductions of invasive
14aquatic plants is critical to long-term control and management of
15those invasive species to protect the state’s environment, economy,
16and human health from harmful impacts of those invasive species.

17(d) Authorizing the Department of Boating and Waterways to
18cooperate with other state, federal, and local agencies in the
19identification and management of invasive aquatic plants in-lieu
20of requiring that the department undertake legislative action each
21time a new species of invasive aquatic plant is identified, would
22enable the state to manage and control invasive aquatic plants in
23the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun
24Marsh in a more cost-efficient and effective manner than is
25currently implemented.

26

SEC. 2.  

Section 48.5 is added to the Fish and Game Code, to
27read:

28

48.5.  

begin insert(a)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insert(1)end insertbegin insertend insert “Invasive aquatic plant” means an aquatic plant
29orbegin delete algaend deletebegin insert algae speciesend insert, including its seeds, fragments, and other
30biological materials capable ofbegin delete propagatingend deletebegin insert propagating,end insert thatbegin delete plant
31or alga, that is usually not native to an area, and whose
32establishmentend delete
begin insert meets the following criteria:end insert

begin insert

33(A) It is nonnative to an area.

end insert

34begin insert(B)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertIts establishmentend insert and spread causes or is likely to cause
35harm tobegin delete nativeend deletebegin insert any of the following:end insert

36begin insert(end insertbegin inserti)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertNativeend insert species and theirbegin delete habitat; theend deletebegin insert habitat.end insert

P4    1begin insert(ii)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertTheend insert economy, including the viability of commercial,
2agricultural, aquacultural, or recreationalbegin delete activities; and humanend delete
3begin insert activities.end insert

4begin insert(iii)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertHumanend insert health.begin delete Aquaticend delete

5begin insert(2)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertFor purposes of this section, “invasive” denotes the
6uncontrolled or unintended spread of the species into a nonnative
7environment.end insert

8begin insert(b)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertAquaticend insert plants shall be determined to be invasive through
9the risk assessment required to be completed by the department in
10consultation with the Department of Boating and Waterways and
11other state, local, and federal agencies pursuant to subdivision (c)
12of Section 64.5 of the Harbors and Navigation Code.

13

SEC. 3.  

Section 64.5 is added to the Harbors and Navigation
14Code
, to read:

15

64.5.  

(a) The department is designated as the lead agency of
16the state for the purpose of cooperating with other state, local, and
17federal agencies in identifying, detecting, controlling, and
18administering programs to manage invasive aquatic plants in the
19Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and the Suisun
20Marsh. The department, in consultation with appropriate state,
21local, and federal agencies, may take such action it determines is
22necessary, upon concurrence from the Department of Fish and
23Wildlife following the completion of the risk assessment described
24in subdivision (c), to implement control and, when feasible,
25eradication measures for invasive aquatic plants. Any actions taken
26to control invasive aquatic plants shall be in compliance with all
27applicable laws and regulations and conducted in an
28environmentally sound manner.

29(b) The department shall regularly consult with the United States
30Department of Agriculture, the United States Fish and Wildlife
31Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
32the University of California, and other members of the scientific
33and research communities, as well as other state agencies with
34 authority over the control of invasive aquatic plants to determine
35which species of those plants should be given the highest priority
36for management and determine the best control and, when feasible,
37eradication measures.

38(c) (1) After consulting with the various entities as required in
39subdivision (b), if the department identifies a species of begin deleteinvasiveend delete
40 aquatic plant that may need to be controlled or eradicated, the
P5    1department shall notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife of the
2potential threat from that plant species. After receipt of that notice,
3the Department of Fish and Wildlife, in consultation with other
4appropriate local, state, and federal agencies, including, but not
5limited to, the Department of Food and Agriculture, the Department
6of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control Board,
7the Department of Pesticide Regulation, and the Office of
8Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, shall conduct a risk
9assessment of thebegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant species identified by the
10department to determine whether the plant species presents a threat
11to the environment, economy, or human health. In making that
12determination, the department shall take prompt action to minimize
13detrimental impacts and costs of management, and shall consider
14all of the following:

begin delete

15(A) Whether the invasive aquatic plant species may obstruct
16navigation and recreational uses of waterways.

end delete
begin delete

17(B)

end delete

18begin insert(end insertbegin insertA)end insert Whether thebegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant species may cause
19environmental damage, including threats to the health and stability
20of fisheries, impairment to birds’ access to waterways and nesting,
21roosting, and foraging areas, deterioration of water quality resulting
22from plant decay, and harm to native plants.

begin insert

23(B) Whether the aquatic plant species may obstruct navigation
24and recreational uses of waterways.

end insert

25(C) Whether thebegin delete invasiveend delete aquatic plant species may cause harm
26to the state’s economy, infrastructure, or manmade facilities such
27as state water storage facilities and pumping operations, by
28increasing flood risk, threatening water supplies by blocking
29pumps, canals, and dams necessitating early control efforts.

30(2) Based on factors specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and
31(C) of paragraph (1) and any other environmental, economic, or
32human health impacts, the risk assessment shall specify whether
33the plant species under consideration has been determined to be
34an invasive aquatic plant. Findings from the risk assessment shall
35be documented in a way that clearly describes the severity and
36types of impacts caused by a plant species determined to be an
37invasive aquatic plant.

38(3) begin deleteAfter end deletebegin insertWithin 30 days after end insertcompleting the risk assessment
39required by paragraph (1), the Department of Fish and Wildlife
40shall report its findings to the department so that the department
P6    1may take any necessary action to control and, when feasible,
2eradicate an invasive aquatic plant, as authorized under subdivision
3(a).

4(d) begin insert(1)end insertbegin insertend insert For purposes of this section, “invasive aquatic plant”
5means an aquatic plant orbegin delete algaend deletebegin insert algae speciesend insert, including its seeds,
6fragments, and other biological materials capable ofbegin delete propagatingend delete
7begin insert propagating,end insert thatbegin delete plant or alga, that is usually not native to an area,
8and whose establishmentend delete
begin insert meets the following criteria:end insert

begin insert

9(A) It is nonnative to an area.

end insert

10begin insert(end insertbegin insertB)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertIts establishmentend insert and spread causes or is likely to cause
11harm tobegin delete nativeend deletebegin insert end insertbegin insertany of the following:end insert

12begin insert(end insertbegin inserti)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertNativeend insert species and theirbegin delete habitat; theend deletebegin insert habitat.end insert

13begin insert(ii)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertTheend insert economy, including the viability of commercial,
14agricultural, aquacultural, or recreationalbegin delete activities; and humanend delete
15begin insert activities.end insert

16begin insert(iii)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertHumanend insert health.begin delete Aquaticend delete

17begin insert(2)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertFor purposes of this section, “invasive” denotes the
18uncontrolled or unintended spread of the species into a nonnative
19environment.end insert

20begin insert(e)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertAquaticend insert plants shall be determined to be invasive through
21the risk assessment required to be completed by the Department
22of Fish and Wildlife in consultation with the department and other
23state, local, and federal agencies pursuant to subdivision (c).

begin delete

24(e)

end delete

25begin insert(f)end insert This section shall not be construed to imply that water
26hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) or Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa)
27can be successfully eradicated. However, control of these
28populations shall be attempted pursuant to Section 64. Eradication
29of South American spongeplant (Limnobium laevigatum)
30populations shall be attempted when detected to the extent feasible.



O

    94