BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 763 (Buchanan) - Aquatic invasive plants: control and  
          eradication.
          
          Amended: August 12, 2013        Policy Vote: NR&W 
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 12, 2013                     Consultant:  
          Marie Liu     
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 763 would designate the Department of Boating  
          and Waterways (DBW) as the lead agency in identifying,  
          detecting, controlling, and administering programs to manage  
          invasive aquatic plants in the Delta, its tributaries, and the  
          Suisun Marsh.

          Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs pressures, likely in the millions  
          of dollars, from the Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund  
          (special) to DBW for the costs of responding to a new invasive  
          aquatic plant in the Delta that will need to be managed.

          Background: Under existing law, there are a multitude of state  
          entities that have broad and specific responsibilities relating  
          to aquatic invasive species including the Departments of Fish  
          and Wildlife (DFW), Food and Agriculture, Water Resources, and  
          Boating and Waterways. DBW's authority regarding aquatic  
          invasive species is very specific- it only has the statutory  
          authority to treat water hyacinth, Brazilian elodea, and South  
          American spongeplant in the Delta. 

          Proposed Law: This bill would give DBW broad authority in  
          identifying, detecting, controlling, and administering programs  
          to manage invasive aquatic plants in the Delta, its tributaries,  
          and the Suisun Marsh. Specifically DBW would be required to:
              Regularly consult with other specified federal and state  
              agencies to determine which aquatic plant species should be  
              given the highest priority for management and to determine  
              the best control and eradication measures.
              Notify DFW when it has identified a species that may need  
              to be controlled or eradicated. DFW would be required to  
              conduct a risk assessment of the species to determine  








          AB 763 (Buchanan)
          Page 1


              whether it presents a risk to the environment, economy, or  
              human health and navigation and recreational uses of  
              waterways. The assessment would also determine whether the  
              plant is invasive. DFW's findings would be reported to DBW  
              so that DBW can take actions to control, and possibly  
              eradicate, an invasive plant species. 

          Related Legislation: AB 1540 (Buchanan) Chapter 188/2012  
          designated DWB the lead agency for the purpose of responding to  
          South American spongeplant in the Delta.

          Staff Comments: This bill would negate the need for statutory  
          changes to DBW's authority to respond to future identified  
          aquatic invasive plants, which potentially can allow DBW to  
          respond more quickly to new threats. Controlling and eradicating  
          invasive species can be quite costly. For example, DBW currently  
          spends tens of thousands of dollars annually in herbicide costs  
          to control water hyacinth in the Delta. By giving DBW broad  
          authority to respond to new species, there puts a substantial  
          cost pressure, likely in millions of dollars on the Harbor and  
          Watercraft Fund for costs to identify, detect, control or  
          otherwise manage additional species. Likely costs include  
          conducting a biological assessment, preparation of necessary  
          CEQA documents for management activities, herbicide costs, water  
          quality monitoring, species monitoring, and equipment costs.

          Staff notes that early response to invasive species is far less  
          costly than a delayed response or mitigating the impacts of a  
          widespread infestation of an aquatic invasive plant.

          DFW anticipates no additional costs imposed by this bill as the  
          responsibilities of DFW in the bill are consistent with current  
          practices.

          Recommended Amendments: DBW, as part of the Governor's  
          reorganization, became the Division of Boating and Waterways  
          within the Department of Parks and Recreation effective July 1,  
          2013. This bill should be amended to reflect this change.














          AB 763 (Buchanan)
          Page 2