BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó          1
                SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
                                 ALEX PADILLA, CHAIR
          
          AB 793 -  Gray                Hearing Date:  July 2, 2013        
          A
          As Amended:         June 25, 2013                 Non-FISCAL      
            B
                                                                        
                                                                        7
                                                                        9
                                                                        3
                                      DESCRIPTION
           
           Current law  requires investor-owned utilities, publicly owned  
          utilities (POUs), community choice aggregators, and energy  
          service providers to increase purchases of renewable energy such  
          that at least 33% of total retail sales are procured from  
          renewable energy resources by December 31, 2020. In the interim  
          each entity would be required to procure an average of 20% of  
          renewable energy for the period of January 1, 2011 through  
          December 31, 2013 and 25% by December 31, 2016.  This is known  
          as the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS).  (Public Utilities  
          Codes 399.11 et seq.)
           
          Current law  defines as RPS eligible, specified electric  
          generation resources including small hydroelectric generation of  
          30 megawatts (MWs) or less and hydroelectric generation units  
          sized below 40 MWs, if operated as part of a water supply or  
          conveyance system and operative prior to 2005. (Public Resources  
          Code 25741)
           
          Current law  permits specified POUs that have ownership or  
          long-term contracts for generation from large hydroelectric  
          generation resources including Trinity and the San Francisco  
          Public Utilities Commission to meet only the electricity demands  
          unsatisfied by hydroelectric generation.  (Public Utilities Code  
          399.30)
           
          This bill  limits the RPS procurement obligation for a POU that  
          owns and operates a hydroelectric facility that came into  
          service in 1967, and for which the POU will take the generation  
          rights in 2014, to the electricity demands unsatisfied by that  
          hydroelectric generation. 
                                      BACKGROUND
           
          The New Exchequer Dam - This bill would only apply to one POU,  
          Merced Irrigation District (MID), and one hydroelectric  
          facility, the New Exchequer Dam, which is part of the Merced  
          River Hydroelectric Project in Mariposa County, about 23 miles  
          northeast of the City of Merced. The dam and hydroelectric  
          facility were originally constructed in 1926, enlarged in the  
          mid-1960s, and put into service in 1967.  The project is a water  
          supply/flood control/recreation/power project under the  
          jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and  
          occupies 2,942 acres of federal land under the jurisdiction of  
          the Bureau of Land Management.  The plant capacity is 94.5  
          megawatts and produces approximately 250,000 megawatt hours of  
          electricity each year.  Although the hydroelectric facility was  
          constructed by, and is owned and operated by the MID, PG&E has  
          had a contractual right to the generation since 1967 which  
          expires on July 1, 2014.  
          Implementing Regulations - On March 1st the California Energy  
          Commission (CEC) released proposed regulations for enforcement  
          rules and procedures for the RPS for POUs as required by SB x1 2  
          (Simitian, Stats. 2011, 1st Ex. Sess., ch. 1).  The regulations  
          were adopted in June and establish the rules and procedures that  
          the CEC will use to assess a POU's procurement actions and  
          determine compliance with the RPS.  If appropriate, the CEC will  
          issue a notice of violation and correction for a POU's failure  
          to comply and refer the violation to the State Air Resources  
          Board for potential penalties. 
                                       COMMENTS
           
              1.   Author's Purpose  .  Although the RPS statute specifies  
               that the renewable procurement obligation extends to  
               electricity demand not met by long-term resource needs, the  
               law does not provide a clear definition of unmet need.  The  
               MID is in the unique position of having owned and operated  
               a 95 megawatt hydroelectric facility since the 1960s but  
               when the facility was built MID entered into a contract  
               with PG&E to sell it the electricity.  That contract  
               terminates on July 1, 2014 at which time the electricity  
               supply will revert to MID.  The author argues that MID  
               should only have to procure renewables for the generation  
               needs not met by the hydroelectric facility that it owns. 
              2.   Unmet Need  .  Current law requires the utilities to  
               procure renewable resources "in order to fulfill unmet  
               long-term resource needs."  This provision was intended to  
               ensure that a utility is not obligated to procure renewable  
               resources beyond its retail electricity needs and  
               generation contracted for or owned by a utility.  In  
               application this would mean if a utility has no load growth  
               or expiring contracts in its portfolio, compliance with the  
               RPS would not be required or would be reduced.  
              3.   CEC Implementation  .  The CEC's regulations to establish  
               POU enforcement rules and procedures for the RPS do not  
               address the issue raised by this bill or unmet need.  The  
               regulations require renewable procurement strictly based on  
               total retail sales.  The CEC opines that the unmet need  
               referenced in statute conflicts with several provisions  
               that reference total retail sales as part of the metric for  
               determining procurement targets.  
              4.   Facility Expansion  .  The sponsor has pursued changes in  
               federal law to expand the dam that supplies this facility  
               which could increase its electricity production.  The  
               intent of this bill and the unmet need provision in current  
               law is that the utility would not have to procure renewable  
               generation that is not needed to serve the utility's  
               electric load.  However, unmet need was not intended to  
               permit existing non-renewable generation in a utility's  
               portfolio to expand or a contract for the same to be  
               extended thereby reducing the long-term RPS requirements.   
               Consequently, the committee may wish to consider amending  
               this bill to exclude generation as a result of reservoir  
               expansion from reducing the utility's procurement  
               obligation under the RPS. 
                                    ASSEMBLY VOTES
           
          Assembly Floor                     (65-4)
          Assembly Natural Resources Committee                            
          (7-0)
          Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee                       
          (12-0)
                                       POSITIONS
           
           Sponsor:
           
          Merced Irrigation District
           Support:
           
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California Farm Bureau Federation
          Modesto Irrigation District
           Oppose:
           
          California Hydropower Reform Coalition
          California Wind Energy Association
          Clean Power Campaign
          Large-Scale Solar Association
          Pacific Gas and Electric Company
          Union of Concerned Scientists
          Kellie Smith 
          AB 793 Analysis
          Hearing Date:  July 2, 2013