AB 822, as introduced, Hall. Local government retirement plans.
Under existing law, the adoption of a charter or amendment to a charter of a city or city and county may be submitted to the voters at a statewide general, statewide primary, or regularly scheduled municipal election.
This bill would require a charter or charter amendment that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit plan of employees of the city or city and county to be submitted to voters at a statewide general election.
Existing law requires local legislative bodies, before authorizing changes in public retirement plan benefits or other postemployment benefits, to secure the services of an actuary to provide a statement of the actuarial impact of the changes.
This bill would require, whenever a local measure qualifies for the ballot that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit plan of employees of a local government entity, whether by initiative or legislative action, the governing body of the local government entity to secure the services of an independent actuary to provide a statement, not to exceed 500 words in length, of the actuarial impact of the proposed measure upon future annual costs of the retirement benefit plan, and to have this statement printed on the ballot. The bill would require, under certain circumstances, that the proponents of an initiative measure pay an additional filing fee to pay for the costs of the actuarial impact statement, which would be refunded if the measure is approved by the voters. The bill would require the governing body to make public at least 2 weeks prior to the election the future costs that will result from the changes to the retirement plan proposed by the measure. The bill would require a specified notice regarding obtaining a copy of the measure to be printed on the ballot, if text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot.
By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 9255 of the Elections Code is amended
2to read:
(a) begin deleteA end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertExcept as otherwise provided in paragraph
4(2), a end insertcharter or charter amendment proposed by a charter
5commission, whether elected or appointed by a governing body,
6for a city or city and county shall be submitted to the voters at an
7established statewide general, statewide primary, or regularly
8scheduled municipal election date pursuant to Section 1200, 1201,
9or 1301, provided that there are at least 95 days before the election.
10A charter commission may also submit a charter pursuant to
11Section 34455 of the
Government Code.
12(2) A charter or charter amendment described in paragraph
13(1) that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement
14benefit plan of employees of the city or city and county shall be
15submitted to voters only at an established statewide general
16election.
P3 1(b) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertExcept as otherwise provided in paragraph (2), the end insert
2following city or city and county charter proposals shall be
3submitted to the voters at an established statewide general,
4statewide primary, or regularly scheduled municipal election,
5pursuant to Section 1200, 1201, or 1301,
provided that there are
6at least 88 days before the election:
7(1)
end delete
8begin insert(A)end insert An amendment or repeal of a charter proposed by the
9governing body of a city or a city and county on its own motion.
10(2)
end delete
11begin insert(B)end insert An amendment or repeal of a city charter proposed by a
12petition signed by 15 percent of the registered voters of the city.
13(3)
end delete
15begin insert(C)end insert An amendment or repeal of a city and county charter
16proposed by a petition signed by 10 percent of the registered voters
17of the city and county.
18(4)
end delete
19begin insert(D)end insert A recodification of the charter proposed by the governing
20body on its own motion, provided that the recodification does not,
21in any manner, substantially change the provisions of the charter.
22(2) A charter or charter amendment described in paragraph
23(1) that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement
24benefit plan of employees of the city or city and county shall be
25submitted to voters only at an established statewide general
26election.
27(c) Charter proposals by the governing body and charter
28proposals by petition of the voters may be submitted at the same
29election.
30(d) The total number of registered voters of the city or city and
31county shall be determined according to the county elections
32official’s last official report of registration to the Secretary of State
33that was effective at the time the notice required pursuant to Section
349256 was given.
Section 9611 is added to the Elections Code, following
36Section 9610, to read:
(a) Whenever a local measure qualifies for the ballot
38that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit
39plan of employees of a local government entity, whether by
P4 1initiative or legislative action, the governing body of the local
2government entity shall do all of the following:
3(1) Secure the services of an independent actuary to provide a
4statement, not to exceed 500 words in length, of the actuarial
5impact of the proposed measure upon future annual costs of the
6retirement benefit plan, including normal cost and any additional
7accrued liability.
8(2) Make public at a public meeting at least two weeks prior to
9the election that the measure has qualified for, the
future costs that
10will result from the changes to the retirement plan proposed by
11the measure.
12(b) The statement provided pursuant to paragraph (1) of
13subdivision (a) shall be printed on the ballot preceding the
14arguments for and against the measure, if any.
15(c) If the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot,
16nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot, there
17shall be printed immediately below the independent actuarial
18analysis, in no less than 10-point bold type, a legend substantially
19as follows:
20“The above statement is an independent actuarial analysis of
21Ordinance or Measure ____. If you desire a copy of the ordinance
22or measure, please call the elections official’s office at (insert
23telephone number) and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.”
24(d) If a measure described in this section qualifies for the ballot
25pursuant to an initiative petition described in Section 9101, 9102,
269201, or 9301, the proponents of the measure shall pay an
27additional filing fee to pay for the costs of the actuarial impact
28statement in an amount to be established by the local governing
29body, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). If the measure is
30adopted by the voters, the fee shall be refunded to the proponent.
31(e) For the purpose of this section:
32(1) “Actuary” has the same meaning as in Section 7507 of the
33Government Code.
34(2) “Future annual costs” has the same meaning as in Section
357507 of the Government Code.
36(3) “Local government entity” includes a city, county, city and
37county, school
district, community college district, county board
38of education, and special district.
39(f) The requirements of this section apply to a charter city,
40charter city and county, or charter county.
The Legislature finds and declares that the security of
2public moneys and the fiscal integrity of local governmental entities
3in this state, including charter cities and charter counties, have a
4direct impact on the long-term well-being of all residents of this
5state. Further, many local governments experiencing budgetary
6crises have difficulty providing sufficient public safety services
7and place additional burdens on resources of the state. Accordingly,
8ensuring an informed electorate with respect to the statewide
9integrity and security of government pension systems and ensuring
10the sufficiency of public safety services are matters of statewide
11concern and not a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section
125 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
14this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
15local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
16pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
174 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
99