BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 825
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 24, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                 AB 825 (Medina) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and  
          Taxation     Vote:                            7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill modifies the existing hiring credit for small  
          businesses.  Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Expands the existing definition of a "qualified employer" to  
            include taxpayers that, as of the last day of the preceding  
            taxable year, employed 50 or fewer employees (instead of 20 or  
            fewer employees per current law). 

          2)Provides that the above modification shall apply to taxable  
            years beginning on or after January 1, 2013.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) estimates that this bill would  
          result in an annual General Fund (GF) revenue loss of $50  
          million in fiscal year (FY) 2013-14, $7.1 million in FY 2014-15,  
          and $4.5 million in FY 2015-16.  

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose . The author states that this bill will ensure the  
            money allocated for the hiring credit will be easier for  
            businesses to use while adhering to the spirit of the original  
            bill.  The author argues this bill is geared towards helping  
            small businesses in California create new positions and fill  
            them with qualified employees.

           2)Opposition  .  The California Tax Reform Association states  
            there is little point in broadening the employee tax credit to  
            larger employers because it will have no measurable impact on  








                                                                  AB 825
                                                                  Page  2

            employment but will lose scarce revenue for vital public  
            services.  They argue that hiring occurs when the employee  
            adds value beyond their cost, and the $3000 credit will never  
            make a difference when hiring a new employee costs tens of  
            thousands of dollars on an on-going basis.  The opponents  
            conclude the fact the credit is still unused is evidence of  
            the failure of such tax credits to be meaningful in the hiring  
            process.

           3)Background.   Current state law, SBX 3 15 (Calderon, Stats.  
            2009, Third Extraordinary Session, Ch. 17) allows a credit for  
            taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, for a  
            qualified employer in the amount of $3,000 for each qualified  
            full-time employee hired in the taxable year, determined on an  
            annual full-time basis equivalent.  This credit is allocated  
            by the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and has a cap of $400 million  
            for all taxable years.  The credit remains in effect until  
            December 1 of the calendar year after the year in which the  
            cumulative credit limit has been reached and is repealed after  
            that date.  Any credits not used in the taxable year may be  
            carried forward up to eight taxable years.
             
             The FTB reports that, as of March 4, 2013, 24,345 PIT and  
            business entity returns had been filed claiming the New Jobs  
            Tax Credit, with the cumulative credit amount totaling only  
            $142.5 million.  At this rate, it could take years for the  
            existing $400 million cap to be reached.  

           4)Are hiring credits effective?   Recently, Daniel Wilson,  
            assistant director of the Center for the Study of Innovation  
            and Productivity at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,  
            attempted to answer this question.  Wilson examined the period  
            between January 1990 and August 2009, and found that among  
            states where employers could qualify for credits immediately  
            after enactment of the credit legislation, there was a slight  
            employment increase of 0.12%.  By contrast, states that  
            offered the credits retroactively actually saw a slight  
            decline of 0.06% in employment.  These findings would suggest  
            that hiring credits, at least at the state level, are an  
            ineffective tool for stimulating job growth.

           5)Relevant legislation  .  AB 305 (V. Manuel Perez), reallocates  
            $200 million from the New Jobs Tax Credit to establish a state  
            New Markets Tax Credit program designed to stimulate economic  
            development.  AB 305 is pending in this Committee.








                                                                  AB 825
                                                                  Page  3

                
            6)Previous legislation.    During the 2011-12 session there were  
            11 bills proposed to modify the New Jobs Hiring Credit.  None  
            of these bills, including several similar to AB 825 were  
            enacted.
          
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081