BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION Carol Liu, Chair 2013-2014 Regular Session BILL NO: AB 834 AUTHOR: Williams AMENDED: June 25, 2013 FISCAL COMM: Yes HEARING DATE: July 3, 2013 URGENCY: No CONSULTANT:Kathleen Chavira NOTE : This bill has been referred to the Committees on Business, Professions, and Economic Development and Education. This bill was recently amended to replace its contents and was first heard in its current form in Business, Professions, and Economic Development on July 1, 2013. SUBJECT : School Performance Fact Sheet. SUMMARY This bill exempts a law school that meets specified conditions from having to submit a School Performance Fact Sheet to the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (Bureau). BACKGROUND Current law, until January 1, 2016, establishes the California Private Postsecondary Education Act (Act) of 2009, which provides for the approval, regulation, and enforcement of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (Bureau) within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). (Education Code § 94800-94950) Among other things, the Act requires a regulated institution to provide a prospective student with a School Performance Fact Sheet containing information on completion rates, placement rates, license examination passage rates, salary or wage information, the most recent three-year cohort default rate and the percentage of enrolled students receiving federal student loans (if the institution participates in federal financial programs) and other specified information. (EC § 94910) AB 834 Page 2 Current law exempts the following entities from the Act: a) An institution that offers solely vocational or recreational educational programs. b) An institution offering educational programs sponsored by a bona fide trade, business, professional, or fraternal organization, solely for that organization's membership. c) A postsecondary educational institution established, operated, and governed by the federal government or by this state or its political subdivisions. d) An institution offering either test preparation for examinations required for admission to a postsecondary educational institution or continuing education or license examination preparation, as specified. e) An institution owned, controlled, and operated and maintained by a religious organization, as specified. f) An institution that does not award degrees and that solely provides educational programs for total charges of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or less when no part of the total charges is paid from state or federal student financial aid programs. g) A law school that is accredited by the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar of the American Bar Association or a law school or law study program that is subject to the approval, regulation, and oversight of the Committee of Bar Examiners. h) A nonprofit public benefit corporation that is qualified under Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, is organized specifically to provide workforce development or rehabilitation services and is accredited by an accrediting organization for workforce development or rehabilitation services recognized by the Department AB 834 Page 3 of Rehabilitation. i) An institution that is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities, Western Association of Schools and Colleges, or the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges. j) An institution that has been accredited, for at least 10 years, by an accrediting agency that is: recognized by the United States Department of Education (USDE) and that meets other specified criteria. aa) Flight instruction providers or programs that provide flight instruction pursuant to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, as specified. bb) An institution that is accredited by a regional accrediting agency recognized by the USDE so long as the institution complies with requirements related to student tuition recovery. (EC § 94871) ANALYSIS This bill : 1) Exempts law schools from having to comply with the requirements of the School Performance Fact Sheet, if the school is: a) Accredited by the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar of the American Bar Association (ABA). b) Owned by an institution authorized to operate by the Bureau for Private and Postsecondary Education (Bureau), and reports AB 834 Page 4 graduate salary information and other information to the National Association for Law Placement (NALP). 2) Provides that notwithstanding any other law, a law school that meets the criteria above shall be deemed to satisfy the Fact Sheet requirements by doing both of the following: a) Complying with Standard 509 of the 2012-13 American Bar Association's Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools. b) Providing completion, placement, bar passage, and salary and wage information of graduates to prospective students prior to enrollment through the law school application process administered by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC). STAFF COMMENTS 1) Clarification of the bill's intent . This bill is sponsored by Education Management Corporation (EDMC). According to the author, the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) requirement that an institution have "state authorization" in order to be eligible for Title IV federal student financial aid is prompting at least one law school in California, exempt from Bureau approval, to seek Bureau approval to maintain Title IV eligibility. As a result, that school will be subject to the Bureau's Student Performance Fact Sheet (Fact Sheet) requirements. This bill is specifically designed to address an issue for the Western State College of Law, owned by EDMC. This bill proposes an exemption for a school which is voluntarily coming under the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 in order to meet the requirements for state authorization and be allowed to participate in federal financial aid programs. 2) State authorization . Federal regulations, among other things, require that, in order to participate in Title IV federal financial aid programs, an institution must AB 834 Page 5 be legally authorized by a state to operate educational programs beyond secondary education and have a process to review and act appropriately on complaints concerning postsecondary institutions. Many private postsecondary institutions exempt from oversight of the Bureau were unable to satisfy these requirements. Schools were initially required to be in compliance with the "state authorization" rule by July 1, 2011, however U.S. Department of Education granted extensions for compliance if an institution was able to demonstrate that it was making progress toward obtaining the necessary state authorization. In the case of California, affected private institutions submitted a letter from the Administration supporting a request for an extension from having to comply with the new rules while a process for securing state authorization by these institutions was considered. Extensions were authorized, however indications from the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) were that no further extensions would be granted and institutions would have to meet the requirements by July 1, 2013. However, in May 2013, the USDE announced that it would extend the deadline for complying with a rule requiring states to authorize colleges within their borders by a year (July 1, 2014). On Friday, June 7, 2013, the Bureau for Private and Postsecondary Education (Bureau) notified the USDE of its support for an additional one-year extension of the implementation date of the changes to "state authorization" regulations until July 1, 2014, for the purpose of allowing the Bureau to review licensing applications for otherwise exempt institutions that choose to seek State authorization through the Bureau, and to conduct compliance inspections for institutions approved by the Bureau by means of accreditation. 3) Related budget action . In response to concerns from institutions exempt from the California Private Postsecondary Education Act (Act), on June 27, 2013, as part of the 2013-14 Budget Act, Governor Brown signed legislation (AB 76, Committee on Budget, AB 834 Page 6 Statutes of 2013) authorizing an institution currently exempt from the Bureau's oversight to waive its exempt status and voluntarily opt into the Bureau's oversight. Under the new statutes, once an institution chooses Bureau oversight, the institution is no longer authorized to claim an exemption from the Bureau and is subject to regulation through the full set of power and duties that would apply to an institution that was otherwise exempt from the Act. Institutions that voluntarily waive exemption are able to satisfy the federal "state authorization" requirements and therefore, participate in and access Title IV federal financial aid programs to assist their students in meeting their costs for attendance at those institutions. 4) School Performance Fact Sheets . This bill exempts law schools from having to submit a School Performance Fact Sheet (Fact Sheet) to the Bureau. As law schools are generally exempt from the Act, this requirement would only apply to a law school that voluntarily chooses to come under the Bureau's oversight. Recognizing that exempt institutions may not have this information available, the new law does not require the first Fact Sheet to report any data from the period prior to the date of the issuance of the approval to operate, but does require the institution to disclose that the information is not available on all documents required by the Act. In addition, the institution is still required to report available data collected and calculated in accordance with the California Private Postsecondary Education Act (Act) of 2009, regardless of the purpose for which the data was collected. Upon receiving an approval to operate, however, an institution is required to begin collection and calculation of all information required by the Act for the School Performance Fact Sheets (Fact Sheets). The Fact Sheet must be provided to prospective students, filed with the Bureau for Private and Postsecondary Education (Bureau), and posted on the institution's Web site no later than the first August 1 after the institution is approved to operate and annually thereafter. AB 834 Page 7 5) Is alternate reporting sufficient ? According to the author, the Fact Sheet requirements would require different calculations than those established by the American Bar Association (ABA) and National Association for Law Placement (NALP) and would ultimately provide less data to students than they are already provided through the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) application process. The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) is a nonprofit organization whose members include more than 200 law schools throughout the United States, Canada and Australia and provides products and services to facilitate the admission process for law schools and their applicants worldwide. This Assembly bill was only recently amended to replace its contents. Given the limited time to review the specific reporting requirements of these non-state entities, it is unclear whether the data reported on the Student Performance Fact Sheet is readily available through these other sources. However, while these entities may provide valuable information, they do not necessarily have the consumer protection perspective, nor the financial aid policy objectives that would concern this committee. In addition, the Legislature does not control how or whether information is reported by these non-governmental entities in a manner that serves the state's or student's interests. 6) Premature ? This bill was recently gutted and amended to propose an exception to recently enacted legislation attempting to address complex issues regarding the regulation of the private postsecondary education sector, state authorization, and access to federal financial aid programs. The committee may wish to consider the following: a) State Authorization. The Bureau has notified the USDE of its support for an additional one-year extension of the implementation date of the changes to federal "state authorization" regulations until July 1, 2014. AB 834 Page 8 b) Sunset Review. The Senate Business and Professions Committee is scheduled to undertake a comprehensive review of the Act and the Bureau during the Sunset Review Process. The Bureau is expected to submit a Sunset Report to the Committee in November 2013, and there will a Background Paper by Committee staff, hearings, and sunset legislation during 2014. c) Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) report. Current law (EC § 94949) requires the LAO to report to the Legislature and the Governor on the appropriateness of the exemptions provided under the California Private Postsecondary Education Act (Act) of 2009 with particular attention to the exemptions based on accreditation, by October 1, 2013. The report is specifically required to examine and make recommendations regarding the degree to which regional and national accrediting agencies provide oversight of institutions and protection of student interests, whether that oversight results in the same level of protection of students as provided by the Act, and whether exemptions should be continued, adjusted, or removed. Is it prudent, or even necessary to implement exceptions without adequate time to consider broader policy implications? Given the extension of the implementation of state authorization regulations, shouldn't any further changes or exceptions await the outcome of the review of the Bureau for Private and Postsecondary Education and the statutorily required report of the LAO? SUPPORT Education Management Corporation OPPOSITION None received. AB 834 Page 9