BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 889
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 15, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                     AB 889 (Frazier) - As Amended:  May 2, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:15-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill prohibits health insurers and plans that require step  
          therapy in their prescription drug coverage, from requiring an  
          enrollee to try and fail on more than two medications before  
          allowing access to the originally prescribed drug, with an  
          exception when scientific evidence, as specified, supports more  
          than two required therapies.  Requires insurers and plans to  
          have an expeditious process to authorize exceptions to step  
          therapy.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Across almost all sectors of the health insurance market,  
          insurance premiums would be expected to increase because step  
          therapy is used to control costs and this bill limits its use.   
          According to the California Health Benefits Review Program  
          (CHBRP), the increase to Medi-Cal Managed Care plan expenditures  
          would be approximately $11 million.  

          At least one CalPERS health plan uses step therapy, for  
          significant savings, so this bill could also lead to higher  
          costs, potentially greater than $1 million, for CalPERS.   

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  This bill seeks to address what supporters view as  
            a troubling and dangerous trend in health coverage, which is  
            the use of step therapy or fail-first protocols.  Health plans  
            may require a patient to try up to five other medications  
            before the health plan covers the medication originally  
            prescribed by the patient's health care provider.  For  
            example, a physician may prescribe Drug A but the health plan  








                                                                  AB 889
                                                                  Page  2

            requires the patient to first try drugs B, C, and D.  Only  
            after the patient fails to respond to these medications will  
            the health plan approve the use of the initially prescribed  
            Drug A.  

            For Grace is sponsoring this bill because patients in pain can  
            tell immediately whether a pain medication is working.  For  
            Grace regards step therapy protocols as draconian and asserts  
            an acute problem can become a lifetime of pain and disability.  
             The author points out step therapy or fail-first protocols  
            often take weeks to months to implement.  Health plans use  
            step therapy as a cost-saving measure but research has shown  
            this policy may increase costs due to unnecessary delays in a  
            patient getting the medication originally prescribed.  
             
           2)Step therapy .  According to a 2001 report by the California  
            HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) relating to prescription drug  
            coverage and formulary use in California, step therapy  
            requires patients and physicians to follow a particular  
            sequence of drug treatment.  In general, a patient must fail  
            to respond to a recommended first-line therapy before a  
            second- or third-line medication is prescribed.  Typically,  
            this means patients will be required to try medications that  
            have been on the market for a longer period of time and are  
            usually less expensive than newer medications available to  
            treat a specific condition.

           3)Previous legislation  .  Prior bills in this area focused on  
            pain medication, whereas the current measures do not contain  
            that limitation.  AB 369 (Huffman) of 2012 would have  
            prohibited health plans and health from requiring a patient to  
            try and fail on more than two pain medications before allowing  
            access to the medication, or a generically equivalent  
            prescribed drug. AB 369 was vetoed and the governor's message  
            questioned whether the bill struck "the right balance between  
            physician discretion and health plan or insurer oversight."     


            AB 1826 (Huffman) of 2010 would have required a health plan or  
            health insurer that covers prescription drug benefits to  
            provide coverage for a drug that has been prescribed for the  
            treatment of pain without first requiring the enrollee or  
            insured to use an alternative drug or product.  AB 1826 was  
            held on the Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File.









                                                                  AB 889
                                                                  Page  3


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debra Roth / APPR. / (916) 319-2081