AB 923,
as amended, Bigelow. begin deleteElectrical rates. end deletebegin insertPublic Utilities Commission: direct transaction proceedings.end insert
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.
end insertbegin insertExisting law, relative to electrical restructuring, requires the commission to authorize and facilitate direct transactions between electricity suppliers and retail end-use customers. Existing law, enacted during the energy crisis of 2000-01, authorized the Department of Water Resources, until January 1, 2003, to enter into contracts for the purchase of electricity, and to sell electricity to retail end-use customers at specified costs and procedures. That law suspended the right of retail end-use customers, other than community choice aggregators and a qualifying direct transaction customer, as defined, to acquire service through a direct transaction until the Department of Water Resources no longer supplies electricity under that law. Existing law continues the suspension of direct transactions except as expressly authorized, until the Legislature, by statute, repeals the suspension or otherwise authorizes direct transactions. Existing law requires the commission to authorize direct transactions for nonresidential end-use customers subject to a reopening schedule adopted and implemented by July 1, 2010, that will phase in over a period of not less than 3 years and not more than 5 years, and subject to an annual maximum allowable total kilowatthour limit established for each electrical corporation.
end insertbegin insertThe federal Flood Control Act of 1962 provides that specified amounts of electricity generated by the Central Valley Project power system are to be made available to Tuolumne County and Calaveras County on a first-preference basis.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would require the commission, in a proceeding relating to direct transactions, to consider the federal restrictions on a preference power electricity provider, as defined, to engage in direct transactions.
end insertUnder existing law, the restructuring of the electrical services industry provides for a rate reduction of not less than 10% for residential and small commercial customers of electrical corporations, to remain in effect until the earlier of March 31, 2002, or the date on which specified costs have been fully recovered.
end deleteThis bill would make technical, nonsubstansive changes to that provision.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 365.2 is added to the end insertbegin insertPublic Utilities
2Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) In a proceeding relating to direct transactions, the
4commission shall consider the federal restrictions on a preference
5power electricity provider to engage in direct transactions.
6(b) As used in this section, the following terms mean the
7following:
8(1) “Federal act” means the federal Flood Control Act of 1962
9(Public Law 87-874).
10(2) “Preference power electricity provider” means a public
11power authority, or its successors, that receives all its electricity
12pursuant to a preference right adopted and authorized by the
13United States Congress pursuant to Section 203 of the federal
act.
Section 368 of the Public Utilities Code is
15amended to read:
Each electrical corporation shall propose a cost recovery
2plan to the commission for the recovery of the uneconomic costs
3of an electrical corporation’s generation-related assets and
4obligations identified in Section 367. The commission shall
5authorize the electrical corporation to recover the costs pursuant
6to the plan if the plan meets the following criteria:
7(a) The cost recovery plan shall set rates for each customer class,
8rate schedule, contract, or tariff option, at levels equal to the level
9as shown on electric rate schedules as of June 10, 1996, if
rates
10for residential and small commercial customers
are reduced so that
11these customers receive rate reductions of no less than 10 percent
12for 1998 continuing through 2002. These rate levels for each
13customer class, rate schedule, contract, or tariff option shall remain
14in effect until the earlier of March 31, 2002, or the date on which
15the commission-authorized costs for utility generation-related
16assets and obligations have been fully recovered. The electrical
17corporation shall be at risk for those costs not recovered during
18that time period. Each utility shall amortize its total uneconomic
19costs, to the extent possible, such that for each year during the
20transition period its recorded rate of return on the remaining
21uneconomic assets does not exceed its authorized rate of return
22for those assets. For purposes of determining the extent to which
23the costs have been recovered, any over-collections recorded in
24Energy Costs Adjustment
Clause and Electric Revenue Adjustment
25Mechanism balancing accounts, as of December 31, 1996, shall
26be credited to the recovery of the costs.
27(b) The cost recovery plan shall provide for identification and
28separation of individual rate components, such as charges for
29energy, transmission, distribution, public benefit programs, and
30recovery of uneconomic costs. The separation of rate components
31required by this subdivision shall be used to ensure that customers
32of the electrical corporation who become eligible to purchase
33electricity from suppliers other than the electrical corporation pay
34the same unbundled component charges, other than energy, that a
35bundled service customer pays.
Cost shifting among customer
36classes, rate schedules, contract, or tariff options shall not result
37from the separation required by this subdivision. Nothing in this
38provision is intended to affect the rates, terms, and conditions or
39to limit the use of any Federal Energy Regulatory
P4 1Commission-approved contract entered into by the electrical
2corporation prior to the effective date of this provision.
3(c) In consideration of the risk that the uneconomic costs
4 identified in Section 367 may not be recoverable within the period
5identified in subdivision (a) of Section 367, an electrical
6corporation that, as of December 20, 1995, served more than four
7million customers, and was also a gas corporation that served less
8than four thousand customers, shall have the flexibility to employ
9risk management tools,
such as forward hedges, to manage the
10market price volatility associated with unexpected fluctuations in
11natural gas prices, and the out-of-pocket costs of acquiring the risk
12management tools shall be considered reasonable and collectible
13within the transition freeze period. This subdivision applies only
14to the transaction costs associated with the risk management tools
15and shall not include any losses from changes in market prices.
16(d) In order to ensure implementation of the cost recovery plan,
17the limitation on the maximum amount of cost recovery for nuclear
18facilities that may be collected in any year adopted by the
19commission in Decision 96-01-011 and Decision 96-04-059 shall
20be eliminated to allow the maximum opportunity to collect the
21nuclear costs within the transition cap period.
22(e) As to an electrical corporation that is also a gas corporation
23serving more than four
million California customers, so long as
24any cost recovery plan adopted in accordance with this section
25satisfies subdivision (a), it shall also provide for annual increases
26in base revenues, effective January 1, 1997, and January 1, 1998,
27equal to the inflation rate for the prior year plus two percentage
28points, as measured by the consumer price index. The increase
29shall do both of the following:
30(1) Remain in effect pending the next general rate case review,
31which shall be filed not later than December 31, 1997, for rates
32that would become effective in January 1999. For purposes of any
33commission-approved performance-based ratemaking mechanism
34or general rate case review, the increases in base revenue authorized
35by this subdivision shall create no presumption that the level of
36base revenue reflecting those increases constitute the appropriate
37starting point for subsequent revenues.
38(2) Be used by the utility for the purposes of enhancing its
39transmission and distribution system safety and reliability,
40including, but not limited to, vegetation management and
P5 1emergency response. To the extent the revenues are not expended
2for system safety and reliability, they shall be credited against
3subsequent safety and reliability base revenue requirements. Any
4excess revenues carried over shall not be used to pay any monetary
5sanctions imposed by the commission.
6(f) The cost recovery plan shall provide the electrical corporation
7with the flexibility to manage the renegotiation, buy-out, or
8buy-down of the electrical corporation’s power purchase
9obligations, consistent with review by the commission to assure
10that the terms provide net benefits to ratepayers and are otherwise
11reasonable in protecting the interests of both ratepayers and
12shareholders.
13(g) An
example of a plan authorized by this section is the
14document entitled “Restructuring Rate Settlement” transmitted to
15the commission by Pacific Gas and Electric Company on June 12,
161996.
O
98